...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Jonesboro

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you, or a loved one has fallen victim to a dog bite injury within the Jonesboro locality, securing legal assistance should be prioritized instantly. Dog bites can lead to traumatic physical and emotional scars which are not easily erased. This is where Carlson Bier steps in – we’re your quintessential personal injury attorneys known for our exceptional dedication in advocating for victims of dog bite injuries.

At Carlson Bier, we comprehend the intricacy of Illinois’ unique statutes related to animal attacks and utilize this understanding to protect your rights fervently. With us by your side, rest assured knowing that intricate laws won’t stifle your pursuit of justice but will instead be employed constructively towards achieving favorable result outcomes.

Rely on our adept team at Carlson Bier who understand how challenging these kinds of personal injuries can be; trust us to deploy meticulous strategies designed specifically tailored around Jonesboro’s regulations involving dog-related incidents. We strive relentlessly believe in relentless striving as it leads up until substantial compensations awarded from negligent parties involved thoroughly addresses short-term as well long-lasting implications emanating such unfortunate events.

Choosing Carlson Bier means choosing astute guidance—an assurance aimed at shielding you from potential pitfalls harbored along the journey toward obtaining justified recourse after suffering a dog bite injury.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Jonesboro Illinois

When navigating through the aftermath of a dog bite injury, it is crucial to arm yourself with the right legal representation to champion your cause. Carlson Bier, a distinguished personal injury law firm based in Illinois, has an exemplary track record in providing comprehensive guidance and holistic solutions for victims exposed to dog bite injuries.

Dog bites can occur suddenly and unsuspectingly, leaving victims coping with not only physical damage but also emotional trauma. The effects are far-reaching; from pain/suffering, costly medical bills, lost wages due to inability to work during recovery – making it imperative that you seek assistance. Dedicated exclusively to protecting the rights of those unjustly injured, our team at Carlson Bier understands these complexities.

Several critical facts need understanding when facing the repercussions of a dog bite:

• Every state follows different laws regarding dog bite injuries.

• In Illinois particularly, under the Animal Control Act holds owners strictly liable if their pet inflicts any harm without provocation.

• This means that even if there is no prior instance showcasing violent behavior by the animal – its owner remains legally responsible for all consequent damages inflicted on an innocent victim.

• Case evaluations include numerous factors such as severity of injury(s), resulting psychological distress level and monetary damages incurred (like treatment costs).

All these aspects contribute towards driving a successful compensation claim.

At Carlson Bier, we emphasis educating you about your rights coupled with informed strategy development pertinent to accurately illustrate negligence causing your plight. Expect us carefully documenting every shred evidence like medical records depicting bearing health challenges post-trauma and line-verification from professional psychologists specifying emotional toll endured – substantiating claims backed by merit.

It’s essential having an experienced lawyer orchestrate negotiative passages fighting relentlessly against insurance companies striving hard conceding minimum expenditure possible catching you off-guard distorting common man’s perception related liability hence reimbursement worthiness overall case potentiality may possess.

Also endorsed are preventative methods involving:

• Instruction on self-defense methods against aggressive animals

• Recommendations on behavior deciphering anger intention(s) by dogs

Such granular detail representation in strategizing stems from cumulative wisdom we possess treading judicial corridors extensively – central to securing you just compensation.

At Carlson Bier, it’s not about representing a wide array of personal injury cases. It’s about specializing and refining our insight on the distinct nuances that come part and parcel with dog bite injury cases; ensuring detailed attention rather than a generalized one-size-fits-all approach. Best practices dictate asserting authority embracing possible counter allegations, corporate stonewalling tactics aiding turn tables exponentially maximizing rightful acquisition ascertained while cutting legalese clutter assisting interpretative ease throughout judicial journey undertaken together.

In an experience often marked by confusion and distress, the expertise at play at Carlson Bier instills confidence in our clients through compassionate support and steadfast determination. With us as your advocates, rest assured knowing that every avenue will be explored to ensure you get maximum deserved compensation determined equitably encompassing dimensions of physiological plus psychological anguish confronted post-injury primarily inflicted due to negligent pet ownership or inadequate safeguards.

Humbled by our client testimonials affirming belief enabling restitution driving dog bite victims towards hopeful rehabilitative journeys, we invite navigating below towards “valuation section” aiming classifying true worth claim deems entitled reflecting accurate depiction hardship ensuing unfair canine-inflicted prejudice sharply differs mirky presumptions common misunderstanding may suggest otherwise – unveiling scales making informed decision seeking legal assistance could make affecting outcome claims related compensation eventually providing healing tide recuperating painful bodily/emotional manacles unjustly incurred seemingly ordinary day turned nightmare suddenly uninvitedly caused preventable dog attack yet occurred nevertheless.

It is paramount understanding real-world implications ensuring post trauma resolute recovery requires tenacious experienced law firm confidently navigating complexities orchestrating triumph odds stacked against victims indirectly faced insurance companies pressurized negligently approached pet handling. To learn more how exactly quantify potential case validity correlating direct impacts resultant unfortunate occurrence, please interact “valuation” button below exploring if Carlson Bier successfully partners journey towards justice reclamation.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Jonesboro Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Jonesboro

Areas of Practice in Jonesboro

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Focused on legal support for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others' recklessness or hazardous conditions.

Scald Traumas

Supplying specialist legal services for victims of serious burn injuries caused by mishaps or carelessness.

Healthcare Malpractice

Ensuring expert legal support for clients affected by healthcare malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Items Responsibility

Handling cases involving unsafe products, providing skilled legal help to consumers affected by product-related injuries.

Senior Mistreatment

Representing the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to mistreatment in aged care environments, ensuring justice.

Trip & Fall Mishaps

Adept in tackling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal representation to victims seeking compensation for their suffering.

Childbirth Traumas

Delivering legal guidance for families affected by medical carelessness resulting in newborn injuries.

Automobile Mishaps

Crashes: Concentrated on helping individuals of car accidents receive equitable settlement for hurts and harm.

Motorbike Mishaps

Committed to providing legal support for riders involved in bike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for traumas.

Trucking Mishap

Extending professional legal services for persons involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing adequate recovery for damages.

Building Incidents

Committed to advocating for employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or negligence.

Neurological Damages

Dedicated to ensuring professional legal representation for victims suffering from neurological injuries due to incidents.

Canine Attack Wounds

Proficient in addressing cases for clients who have suffered harms from K9 assaults or animal assaults.

Pedestrian Collisions

Dedicated to legal services for joggers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering damages.

Unwarranted Passing

Standing up for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, providing caring and adept legal services to ensure redress.

Neural Injury

Dedicated to supporting victims with backbone trauma, offering professional legal representation to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer