FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Lily Lake

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with Dog Bite Injuries in Lily Lake, having a dedicated and experienced team of lawyers like Carlson Bier is crucial. Over years of successful practice, we’ve protected the rights and interests of many who have suffered from dog bite injuries. We understand the physical pain, emotional trauma and financial burden that these incidents inflict on victims. Our focused approach allows us to thoroughly prepare each case for trial resulting in favorable outcomes for our clients. At Carlson Bier, we prioritize client communication; keeping you updated every step of your case’s progress while diligently working towards fair compensation entitlements as per Illinois state law requirements. Expertise drawn from extensive experience guarantees precision in identifying potential faults or negligence by liable parties ensuring maximum claim realization for medical bills, lost wages among other damages incurred due to dog bites.Contacting us avails you stringent legal representation driven towards securing accountability and your peace after such unsettling experiences.Choose Carlson Bier today – your reliable partner in navigating complex Dog Bite Injury litigation issues within Illinois jurisdiction.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Lily Lake Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our priority as a dedicated team of personal injury attorneys is to safeguard your rights and ensure you’re compensated fittingly when the unforeseen occurs. We have gathered significant expertise in Illinois, particularly relating to Dog Bite Injuries – one of the leading causes of non-fatal injuries across America. Rest assured that with us by your side, navigating complex legal landscapes becomes less daunting.

When pursuing action against dog bite claims in Illinois, understanding relevant legalities assists greatly in securing desired outcomes. Primarily, Illinois rests on ‘strict liability,’ meaning that a dog owner is responsible for any injuries caused by their pet regardless if they were aware or not about its aggressive nature.

On being bitten by a dog in Illinois, taking certain steps can be beneficial. These include:

• Prompt medical attention: Documenting and treating injuries provide crucial evidence later during claim processing.

• Reporting the incident: Notify local law enforcement or animal control agency – this generates an official record.

• Gathering information: Collect details about the dog including its breed and where it lives; also get contact info from potential witnesses.

• Hiring professional representation: Legal counsel like Carlson Bier ensures rightful compensation gets pursued effectively.

Dog bites may cause varying degrees of physical and psychological damage alike; ranging from minor scrapes to permanent disfigurement or even deadly diseases such as Rabies – making prompt treatment indispensable. Potential emotional trauma should not be overlooked either especially among younger victims which may leave lasting scars that could require therapeutic assistance over time.

In terms of possible compensation channels with respect to Illinois legislation on dog bite incidents, following options exists:

• Medical expenses

-This covers all health-related costs induced directly because of the attack

• Future medical care

-If complications arise post-incident requiring further treatment

• Lost wages

-For those unable to return to work temporarily/permanently due to sustained injuries

• Emotional distress

-As some incidents induce psychological trauma

• Property damage

-If personal belongings got damaged during the incident

At Carlson Bier, our dedicated attorneys work diligently to help secure rightful compensation encompassing these areas on your behalf.

We also understand that every case is unique and demands individual attention – we champion personalized legal service to suit specific circumstances of each client. At each stage, from initial discussions through the final judgment day in court, this optimized approach will empower you with knowledge and fortify trust.

Legal battles often seem overwhelming; concerns about cost can add to this apprehension. We value transparency at Carlson Bier hence want you enlightened about ‘contingency fees,’ our operative payment system for dog bite cases. Simply put: You don’t owe us any fees until we win your case. This stress-free model eradicates upfront charges – ensuring professional representation is accessible when you need it most.

To sum up: Dog bite injuries are complex matters that require specialized understanding of Illinois laws and procedures. By partnering with Carlson Bier, you optimize chances of securing befitting compensation: Our expertise dovetails with unwavering commitment, leveling the playing field wherever collective resources get deployed against individuals seeking justice.

It starts here. Providing just a snapshot into how we operate at Carlson Bier; assisting victims secure rightful compensation post canine-induced injuries remains an area where our track record speaks volumes. Trusted across Illinois because of professionalism coupled with empathy borne out of fundamental understanding that casualties aren’t just statistics but people whose lives have been disrupted unexpectedly.

Click on the button below to determine how much your claim could potentially be worth; let’s together initiate a passage towards justice – bringing closure through proper recompense for adversity endured due to dog bite incidents outside of your control

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Lily Lake Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Lily Lake

Areas of Practice in Lily Lake

Bicycle Collisions

Expert in legal advocacy for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' lack of care or perilous conditions.

Scald Damages

Providing skilled legal assistance for people of serious burn injuries caused by occurrences or indifference.

Hospital Negligence

Providing professional legal advice for clients affected by clinical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Commodities Obligation

Handling cases involving problematic products, extending adept legal guidance to individuals affected by faulty goods.

Senior Neglect

Protecting the rights of elders who have been subjected to mistreatment in senior centers environments, ensuring compensation.

Slip and Slip Accidents

Professional in addressing tumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to sufferers seeking restitution for their injuries.

Newborn Injuries

Offering legal guidance for kin affected by medical incompetence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Car Crashes

Collisions: Devoted to guiding individuals of car accidents receive reasonable compensation for hurts and damages.

Bike Crashes

Dedicated to providing legal assistance for riders involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring just recovery for traumas.

18-Wheeler Accident

Delivering specialist legal support for persons involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recompense for harms.

Construction Crashes

Engaged in representing employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or irresponsibility.

Neurological Injuries

Focused on providing expert legal representation for clients suffering from cognitive injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Bite Wounds

Specialized in addressing cases for people who have suffered wounds from canine attacks or animal assaults.

Jogger Accidents

Specializing in legal advocacy for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering recovery.

Undeserved Death

Standing up for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, offering empathetic and professional legal assistance to ensure compensation.

Vertebral Impairment

Expert in representing individuals with spinal cord injuries, offering expert legal services to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​