FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Melrose Park

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’re striving to navigate life after enduring a spinal cord injury, attorney services from Carlson Bier offer invaluable support and guidance. Specializing in personal injury law with an emphasis on spinal cord injuries, Carlson Bier continually proves its dedication and commitment to clients dealing with the complexities of such cases. Based in Illinois, these expert lawyers are adept at meticulously presenting your scenario to ensure maximum compensation is achieved. Carlson Bier showcases top-tier proficiency regarding local regulations ensuring that each client receives insightful legal advice tailored perfectly for them.

Their attorneys empathize deeply with the physical and emotional trauma faced by individuals affected by spinal cord injuries which drives their relentless pursuit for justice on behalf of their clients – they fight fervently until appropriate recompense is secured.

Undoubtedly, choosing Carlson Bier means opting for premier legal services delivered by compassionate professionals who comprehend the intricacies related uniquely to spinal cord ailments. Illuminate your path towards recovery; trust wisely in the expertise of prior successes remitted across countless cases statewide involving similar unfortunate circumstances – retaining faith that this outcome can be reflected within your own predicament too; make sure it’s Carlson Bier standing beside you throughout.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Melrose Park Illinois

Spinal cord injuries pose a significant threat to the well-being and quality of life for thousands each year in Illinois. At Carlson Bier, we are passionate about assisting victims navigate their way after suffering such devastating misfortunes. As dedicated personal injury attorneys, we understand every intricate detail that comes with spinal cord injuries thus ensuring our clients receive the legal representation they rightly deserve.

The complexity of these injuries necessitates an understanding from several perspectives; primarily medical and legal standpoints. Medically, spinal cord injuries can result either from trauma (car accidents or falls) or disease (cancer or osteoporosis). The effects vary greatly depending on severity and region affected. A victim may experience anything from slight numbness to full paralysis.

Legally, spinal cord injury claims involve numerous sophisticated elements such as:

• Establishing liability: This involves proving another party’s negligence was responsible for your injury.

• Determining damages: Calculating monetary value for past and future medical bills, lost wages, pain, suffering or loss of life enjoyment is crucial.

• Interacting with insurance companies: This is key to securing appropriate compensation.

At Carlson Bier, we offer comprehensive knowledge in each step of this complex process; holding negligent parties accountable while maximizing compensation for related losses suffered by our clients due to spinal cord injuries.

Spinal cords form a major part of the body’s nervous system; transmitting messages from the brain throughout your body. Therefore, damage at any point potentially disrupts these communications affecting physical movements or sensation beneath the injury site. Paralysis severity ranges from weakness in arms or legs (paraparesis), complete loss of control over your lower limbs (paraplegia) through to entirely losing power over most of your body below neck level (quadriplegia); clearly bringing forth critical debilitating impacts upon both individuals involved and their families.

Remember that initiating legal action promptly following a spinal cord injury improves opportunities to secure essential evidence linking your injury to the party at fault. At Carlson Bier, our skilled team is ready to assist you swiftly in locating and safeguarding important evidence alongside other procedures; hence fostering a comprehensive legal approach that delivers.

Illinois laws provide clear guidelines for personal injury cases including those involving spinal cord injuries. Notably, the statute of limitations dictates that these lawsuits must be filed within two years after an incident occurs or from when it could reasonably have been discovered. Complexities with respect to shared fault rules state that if you were partly responsible (less than 50%) for your injury, then compensations received will mirror this percentage – thus adding extra hardships on victims in already traumatic situations.

Engaging Carlson Bier’s respected legal professionals ensures adept guidance right through these daunting realities. Our commitment is towards delivering restitution for physical, emotional suffering and any financial burdens corresponding with spinal cord injuries; while tenaciously fighting against any reductions due to contributory negligence clauses potentially affecting your compensation amount.

Spinal cord injuries undoubtedly present overwhelming obstacles, yet remember that there are organizations and experts readily available ensuring no one faces these struggles alone. As we prioritize clients’ needs above everything else at Carlson Bier, trust us as your go-to choice allowing you access to not just first-class legal counsel but strength during tough times too.

Take advantage of our free consultation today – merely click the button below and unearth how much your case could be worth without delay. With us beside you every step of the way, rest assured of receiving qualified advice amplifying justice served and future prospects brightened!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Melrose Park Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Melrose Park

Areas of Practice in Melrose Park

Cycling Collisions

Focused on legal support for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' indifference or perilous conditions.

Scald Burns

Giving specialist legal services for sufferers of intense burn injuries caused by mishaps or misconduct.

Healthcare Negligence

Ensuring dedicated legal representation for individuals affected by medical malpractice, including negligent care.

Products Responsibility

Managing cases involving problematic products, providing expert legal support to individuals affected by product malfunctions.

Nursing Home Mistreatment

Advocating for the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to mistreatment in senior centers environments, ensuring justice.

Slip & Trip Mishaps

Adept in dealing with tumble accident cases, providing legal support to individuals seeking compensation for their damages.

Newborn Damages

Supplying legal help for households affected by medical incompetence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Car Incidents

Crashes: Devoted to supporting victims of car accidents receive reasonable settlement for wounds and damages.

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Specializing in providing legal advice for riders involved in bike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for damages.

Big Rig Crash

Offering experienced legal advice for drivers involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing adequate recovery for damages.

Construction Site Crashes

Committed to defending staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or carelessness.

Neurological Damages

Committed to offering specialized legal services for persons suffering from brain injuries due to accidents.

Canine Attack Harms

Skilled in addressing cases for victims who have suffered harms from puppy bites or animal attacks.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Dedicated to legal advocacy for walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering compensation.

Unwarranted Loss

Striving for relatives affected by a wrongful death, delivering understanding and professional legal guidance to ensure redress.

Backbone Harm

Dedicated to assisting clients with spine impairments, offering expert legal support to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440