Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Mount Olive

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with the repercussions of a spinal cord injury, secure representation from Carlson Bier- attorneys renowned for their expertise in personal injury law. With an exemplary track record in Illinois, our skillful legal team is committed to helping you get the justice and compensation deserved. We understand that a spinal cord injury can significantly impact your life, causing immense physical and emotional strain. As such, we meticulously analyze every case detail to build robust strategies that increase your chances of attaining favourable results.

Our seasoned lawyers strive to alleviate the burdens associated with these traumatic events by tirelessly advocating on your behalf at all stages of litigation or settlement negotiations when it matters most. By choosing Carlson Bier, you are selecting experience and proven success – tested advocates who negotiate assertively with insurance companies so that clients receive full benefits legally entitled under state laws.

Nonetheless if you find yourself grappling after such an unfortunate event around Mount Olive; despite its distance from us; we underscore not letting geographical constraints hinder access to adept legal service as ours offered throughout Illinois including Mount Olive’s nearby regions.”

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Mount Olive Illinois

At Carlson Bier law firm, we specialize in providing professional legal services for individuals dealing with the aftermath of spinal cord injuries. As reputable personal injury attorneys based in Illinois, our expertise and knowledge have supported countless victims on the road to recovery and financial reparation. Spinal cord injuries are life-altering events that can include severe consequences ranging from temporary impairment to chronic paralysis.

For clarity, Spinal Cord Injuries (SCIs) are typically derived from sudden damage to any part of the spinal cord or nerves at the end of the spinal canal. The ripple effects commonly manifest as permanent changes in strength, sensation and other body functions below the site of injury. The causes can be numerous with vehicular accidents, falls, sports related mishaps and acts of violence being prime contributors.

• There are two forms of spinal injury: complete and incomplete. Complete SCIs result in total loss of all motor function below the level of injury whereas incomplete SCIs involve some degree of movement and sensation retention.

• SCI symptoms vary extensively from pain to respiratory issues – depending on where along the spine the damage has occurred.

• Diagnosing SCIs requires a series of tests including x-rays, CT scans, MRIs and factoring associated complications like blood clots & pressure sores into account.

The implications resulting from these types of injuries extend far beyond just medical expenses. Victims often face physical therapy costs, home modification charges alongside experiencing decreased quality of life due to disability or reduced earning capacity because they are unable to maintain previous levels employment post-injury.

With decades dedicated to understanding Illinois state laws surrounding personal injury cases specific to spinal cord maladies – Our team is committed towards ensuring you receive fair compensation reflective not only for current medical expenses but potential future costs as well imbibed within an encompassing settlement strategy woven around your unique circumstances.

We value transparency, explaining intricacies relevant legislation thus empowering you make informed decisions every step through process towards resolution. Your rights matter at Carlson Bier. We seek highlight loopholes well grey areas claim so can maximize financial remuneration deserve.

• Extensive knowledge of spinal cord injury lawsuits in Illinois.

• We fight for maximum compensation, including lost wages, medical bills and pain & suffering.

• You pay no legal fees unless you receive a settlement or verdict.

Devoting ourselves towards your wellbeing first alongside safeguarding your rights – Together we conceptualize a strategy to bring about the most optimal resolution possible. While doing so, we ensure not only alleviate monetary burden that often accompanies such tragic incidences but also assist clients embrace reassurance they’ve partner who fiercely advocates their cause court law.

The journey from discomforting uncertainty towards hope filled restoration begins understanding inherent value case potentially holds. In fact, every consultation provided Carlson Bier promises value-driven discussion centered around unique situation you find yourself amidst being victim unfortunate circumstance.

Seeking rightful remedy for costs incurred impact caused due untimely spinal injury? Invite you unravel possibilities lies ahead free-of-cost obligation whatsoever partake until verdict reached favor; gauge strength case click button below discover much it’s worth turning hopes tangible reality – one steadfastly committed helping attain as reliable representative on side.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Mount Olive Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Mount Olive

Areas of Practice in Mount Olive

Pedal Cycle Crashes

Proficient in legal advocacy for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' lack of care or risky conditions.

Flame Wounds

Supplying specialist legal help for patients of major burn injuries caused by occurrences or carelessness.

Physician Malpractice

Offering specialist legal support for individuals affected by healthcare malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Products Responsibility

Taking on cases involving faulty products, extending adept legal services to clients affected by harmful products.

Geriatric Misconduct

Defending the rights of elders who have been subjected to misconduct in senior centers environments, ensuring compensation.

Trip & Fall Mishaps

Skilled in dealing with slip and fall accident cases, providing legal assistance to sufferers seeking redress for their damages.

Neonatal Harms

Providing legal aid for kin affected by medical misconduct resulting in infant injuries.

Auto Collisions

Mishaps: Concentrated on guiding individuals of car accidents get appropriate remuneration for damages and impairment.

Motorcycle Crashes

Focused on providing representation for riders involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring justice for harm.

Trucking Collision

Providing experienced legal assistance for individuals involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing appropriate compensation for harms.

Construction Accidents

Committed to assisting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or carelessness.

Cognitive Injuries

Specializing in ensuring expert legal support for persons suffering from cerebral injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Bite Traumas

Expertise in tackling cases for clients who have suffered harms from canine attacks or creature assaults.

Jogger Crashes

Focused on legal representation for walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering recovery.

Unjust Fatality

Fighting for families affected by a wrongful death, delivering sensitive and adept legal services to ensure compensation.

Backbone Impairment

Expert in representing persons with backbone trauma, offering expert legal support to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer