FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in North Barrington

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When suffering from a dog bite injury in North Barrington, expert legal advice is key for the best possible outcome. Enlisting Carlson Bier enhances your chances of obtaining rightful compensation for medical bills, emotional trauma or loss of wages. As an experienced Injury Attorney Group based in Illinois, our prowess extends to safeguarding victims of dog bite injuries and ensuring they receive fair representation. Proficient at navigating through intricate legislation surrounding such incidents, Carlson Bier offers comprehensive advocacy move-for-move against insurance firms adamant on lowball settlements. Our skilled attorneys are trained to examine your case meticulously; proffering tailored strategies that guarantee optimal results within Illinois’ legal purview. Dog-related harm could be physically and emotionally devastating; hence with Carlson Bier supporting you legally—whether it’s negotiating settlements or representing you fiercely in court—we strive relentlessly so justice prevails no matter what challenges crop up along the way! Choosing us paves a viable path towards reclaiming control over your life post a traumatic incident.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in North Barrington Illinois

Dog bites can have life-changing consequences, causing not only physical harm but significant emotional trauma. At Carlson Bier, we understand the seriousness of these incidents and bring a wealth of experience in handling such cases. Our team of adept personal injury attorneys is based in Illinois and is committed to helping dog bite victims receive comprehensive legal assistance.

The aftermath of a dog bite incident is ridden with pain, fear, and oftentimes confusion about what to do next. Leaving the hospital or medical facility should not be the end-point for victims; there are critical steps to take towards securing full compensation for your ordeal:

• Prompt Reporting: Recording an accurate account through local or state animal control departments ensures that both yourselves and future potential victims are safeguarded against similar incidents.

• Medical Documentation: Preserve all records pertinent to your injury treatment process since they outline the severity of damages suffered. They further offer proof that strengthens your claim.

• Timely Legal Action: Time frames for commencing a legal suit exist following any personal injury accident; explicitly referred to as ‘Statute of Limitations’. In Illinois, you have two years from the date of the incident/injury discovery.

We recognize distinguishing factors that make dog bite law unique; its interwoven nature with other spheres like insurance regulations and landlord-tenant laws necessitates adept knowledge to present compelling cases effectively. The Carlson Bier team has familiarity with key aspects including Leash laws—which require dogs be controlled in public spaces—and “One Bite” rule which holds dog owners liable if aware their pet was likely act aggressively due to prior incidents.

Understanding our client’s predicament’s uniqueness forms an integral part of our tailored approach. Each case presented requires individually customized strategies centered on winning rightful compensation suitable for our clients’ needs. Dog bite injuries may give rise to varying costs comprising emergency room visits, wound dressing changes or surgeries among other extensive treatments—all coming into play while estimating the payout you deserve.

At Carlson Bier, we advocate for victims seeking restitution on multiple fronts. The tangible strain resultant from such incidents find expression in medical bills, wage losses due to incapacitation at the workplace whereas other intangible but considerably weighty factors stem straight out of pain, emotional anguish and diminished quality of life.

Choosing the right legal representation can make all difference between a nominal settlement or maximum compensation that accurately mirrors your incurred loss in its entirety. Our team commits to tireless pursuit of what rightfully belongs to you by leveraging vast experience guided by founding principles in tenacity and unflagging dedication.

Entrusting us with your case holds several benefits: We carry an extensive track record of successful settlements while offering personalized attention—attributes key to our practice’s success. Our commitment is not just about obtaining compensatory justice; it’s also about the continuous fight towards safeguarding users’ rights consistently.

If you or someone close has suffered the misfortune of a dog bite injury within Illinois, reaching out to an adroit personal injury attorney from Carlson Bier should be among your priority next steps. Let us help unpack complex laws surrounding this area into comprehensible guidance as we journey together through recovery pathways in search for justice and full recompense—the very objectives excelling every striving endeavor undertaken at Carlson Bier.

Remember, taking immediate action post such unfortunate encounters is critical. Click on the button below now and let our dedicated team compute how much your case is worth—it’s time we held negligent parties accountable for their actions.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For North Barrington Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in North Barrington

Areas of Practice in North Barrington

Bike Crashes

Dedicated to legal advocacy for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others's lack of care or hazardous conditions.

Thermal Damages

Giving expert legal support for patients of intense burn injuries caused by occurrences or negligence.

Medical Malpractice

Delivering experienced legal advice for individuals affected by hospital malpractice, including negligent care.

Products Accountability

Managing cases involving dangerous products, extending adept legal assistance to clients affected by faulty goods.

Geriatric Malpractice

Representing the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to neglect in aged care environments, ensuring fairness.

Fall & Fall Accidents

Professional in tackling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal services to sufferers seeking justice for their damages.

Birth Wounds

Delivering legal aid for households affected by medical malpractice resulting in childbirth injuries.

Car Collisions

Crashes: Concentrated on guiding patients of car accidents gain just compensation for damages and destruction.

Motorbike Collisions

Dedicated to providing legal services for motorcyclists involved in bike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for traumas.

18-Wheeler Incident

Ensuring professional legal assistance for victims involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing rightful recompense for damages.

Building Incidents

Engaged in advocating for staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or carelessness.

Head Damages

Expert in extending compassionate legal advice for persons suffering from cerebral injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Bite Damages

Adept at dealing with cases for victims who have suffered injuries from canine attacks or wildlife encounters.

Pedestrian Mishaps

Expert in legal representation for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering restitution.

Unfair Demise

Advocating for families affected by a wrongful death, delivering sensitive and expert legal representation to ensure fairness.

Spine Damage

Specializing in defending clients with spine impairments, offering expert legal assistance to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​