FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Products Liability Attorney in Oak Grove

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with a products liability case in Oak Grove, choosing Carlson Bier attorney group is your best option. As an astute law firm with extensive experience, we have consistently demonstrated impressive success rates in handling intricate legal scenarios surrounding product liabilities. Our seasoned attorneys grasp the complexity of these cases and work tirelessly to ensure that justice is served effectively. Moreover, at Carlson Bier, our depth of knowledge about Illinois State laws gives us an edge allowing us to extensively assist those affected by inferior or faulty products. The commitment towards maximum compensation for victims ensures you are not left bearing the burden alone. With a proven track record and exceptional client support system, entrusting your product liability issues to us guarantees you unwavering advocacy throughout this challenging journey.

By bringing together expertise and dedication under firm legal principles,the trustworthy lawyers at Carlson Bier turn losses into wins.This shows our complete understanding of how tough it can be for anyone battling a Product’s Liability issue & why addressing your case professionally and diligently is so important.On behalf of every hard-working citizen out there who has encountered damaging product circumstances,CB gives voice to their trials with integrity.That’s why so many people choose CB as their preferred arrayed force when standing up against negligent manufacturers: because here,you’re never just another name.You’re family.Welcome home,to where each voice- yours included – demands respect,maintains dignity,and receives nothing short but total commitment.No matter what bore-illegal consequences earlier;what counts,differently enough,is now onwards.The sole promise remains forever unchanged:your worries are ours too – until justice triumphs everything,endlessly.Here we proudly stand transformative,welcoming everyone aboard,on till victory marches again,towards better change.For fighting back starts now,starts here,in full swing.Understanding its nuances,pioneers maintain guiding light across foggy uncertainty called Products Liability.With an exclusive spectrum addressing several other perils,C.Battorneys don’t just represent someone facing those odd,invincible legal struggles:instead champion their rightful claims until the battle’s wholeheartedly won.Because first-time justice prevails enduringly;and when CB stands by your side,favors tilt evidently towards none but you.You’ve come to the best lawyers who understand what it really means to be in your shoes – struggling for a right as basic as safe product fairness and ultimately,your strong standing respects is every triumph resting upon C Bier’s experienced shoulders today.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Products Liability Lawyers in Oak Grove Illinois

At Carlson Bier, a distinguished personal injury law firm in Illinois, we prioritize our clients’ legal needs and are experts in product liability cases. Product Liability is an intricate legal concept that involves manufacturers, distributors, suppliers, retailers and any other parties who design or make products available to the public. It holds these entities liable for any injuries caused by defective or dangerous products.

Ensuring consumer safety should be at the heart of every manufacturing process—but sometimes this principle gets compromised. A defective product can end up on market shelves due to negligence during production, incomplete inspections and testing coefficients, flawed designs originating from blueprint stages or errors in installation instructions.

Being well versed in numerous cases associated with different types of product flaws worsens the possibility of facing severe consequences or undergoing devastating experiences due to deemed unsafe commodities. Here’s a deeper glance into what you need to know about Product Liability:

– **Manufacturer’s Flaws:** These involve defects attributed directly to negligence during the manufacturing phase

– **Design Defects:** Involves situations where the entire line of products is fundamentally faulty irrespective of satisfactory adherence to all manufacturing processes

– **Failure-to-warn / improper labeling:** This occurs when there are no appropriate instructions provided regarding safe assembly process & usage of purchased items

In addition to ensuring justice is served after encountering damages from a poorly manufactured item distributed irresponsibly among consumers; navigating through these complicated waters calls for competences exceeding an ordinary realm.

Carlson Bier takes pride in providing remarkable representation as extensive experience bears fruit to pinpointing behind-the-scenes neglect throughout production phases — paving your way towards deserved compensations. Rest assured that we have proven track records fighting against large corporations on behalf of consumers like you—persistently striving for rightful restitutions.

Suffering injuries from flawed items doesn’t resume only within monetary implications – privacy intrusion due to data breaches orchestrated via cyber weaknesses could become another spectrum entailing profound deliberation under product liability. As your trusted advocates, we extend our support beyond expected areas – thoroughly assessing alleged defects to determine whether it was the manufacturer’s neglect or unavoidable error leading to unfortunate circumstances.

In Illinois, significant contributions by Carlson Bier over cases involving product liabilities stand unrivaled. You won’t just meet understanding professionals but also a relentless fighter dedicated to upholding your rights—transforming legal journeys entailing unpredicted obstacles into pathways paved under comprehensive cognition articulating convoluted terms & clauses favorably addressing your claim demands.

It’s noteworthy to mention that many personal injury litigation related to products liability operates under ‘strict liability.’ This means manufacturers are held accountable if their products were set out as potentially hazardous — excluding emotional distress unless physically harmed ensues; irrespective of proven negligence.

Impacted lives due to manufacturers’ careless gambles deserve justice and better horizons: welcome resolutions enabled through Carlson Bier’s relentless pursuits for problem-solving in protection of consumer rights with comprehensive legal expertise.

While exploring new possibilities strengthening rightful claims, please remember each consultation is confidential, and you owe us nothing unless we win on your behalf which reiterates our commitment towards ensuring every entitled individual gets deserved attention while batting against ill-hearted market elements exploiting trust placed implicitly during purchase decisions.

Click on the button below today! Our compassionate team prioritizes accurate evaluations revealing worth of probable compensations aligned with damages faced further clarifying where one stands legally after experiencing negative consequences resulting from unsafe products endangering ordinary lives—one practical step at a time contributing towards empowering restitutions also manifest actual value attached behind cheerfully embraced corrective measures benefitting consumers nationwide impacted unfortunately via involuntarily purchasing defective goods made available through questionable manufacturing practices.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Oak Grove Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Product Liability FAQ​

Product liability is the legal responsibility of manufacturers, distributors, sellers, and suppliers for injuries caused by defective products.

The three main types of product liability claims are:

  • Manufacturing defects: These defects occur during the manufacturing process and cause the product to be unsafe.
  • Design defects: These defects exist in the design of the product and make it inherently unsafe.
  • Marketing defects: These defects occur when the manufacturer or seller fails to adequately warn consumers about the dangers of the product.

The signs and symptoms of a product liability injury can vary depending on the type of product that caused the injury. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Physical injuries: These could include cuts, bruises, burns, fractures, and other injuries.
  • Property damage: This could include damage to your home, car, or other belongings.
  • Economic losses: These could include lost wages, medical expenses, and other financial losses.

The treatment options for product liability injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to repair injuries that were caused by a defective product.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of product liability injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for a product liability injury if you have been injured due to a defective product. A product liability lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Oak Grove

Areas of Practice in Oak Grove

Cycling Crashes

Specializing in legal representation for people injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' recklessness or dangerous conditions.

Flame Wounds

Offering adept legal help for patients of intense burn injuries caused by events or recklessness.

Medical Incompetence

Delivering expert legal assistance for clients affected by healthcare malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Goods Fault

Managing cases involving problematic products, providing expert legal support to customers affected by defective items.

Nursing Home Malpractice

Representing the rights of seniors who have been subjected to misconduct in elderly care environments, ensuring fairness.

Stumble and Slip Injuries

Professional in managing stumble accident cases, providing legal advice to sufferers seeking restitution for their injuries.

Newborn Damages

Offering legal assistance for kin affected by medical misconduct resulting in infant injuries.

Vehicle Mishaps

Mishaps: Committed to supporting patients of car accidents secure appropriate compensation for harms and impairment.

Motorbike Crashes

Focused on providing representation for victims involved in bike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for damages.

18-Wheeler Mishap

Ensuring experienced legal advice for victims involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing adequate claims for losses.

Construction Incidents

Dedicated to supporting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or misconduct.

Neurological Harms

Focused on offering professional legal representation for clients suffering from cerebral injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Traumas

Adept at dealing with cases for people who have suffered wounds from puppy bites or beast attacks.

Cross-walker Collisions

Expert in legal services for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Unwarranted Passing

Fighting for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, providing sensitive and adept legal support to ensure justice.

Vertebral Harm

Focused on supporting patients with backbone trauma, offering compassionate legal services to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​