...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Oregon

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

For those suffering from dog bite injuries in Oregon, turning to Carlson Bier is an invaluable choice. As a renowned personal injury firm, they excel at managing dog bite injury cases with unmatched professionalism and dedication. They understand the physical damage and psychological trauma one can endure after a vicious canine attack, striving to provide compassionate legal counsel during this challenging time. Equipped with extensive knowledge of prevailing laws and a keen ability to navigate complex litigation pathways, their experienced attorneys aim for outcomes that favor their clients – relief both financial and emotional. Trusting Carlson Bier signifies enlisting skilled practitioners who value thorough investigations into your case particulars before formulating impactful strategies backed by proven courtroom expertise—intent on securing warranted compensation for medical costs or lost wages due to pet-induced harm scenarios you’ve become victimized by—without ever compromising respect or commitment towards client needs—a beacon amidst legalese storm; turn confidently towards Carlson Bier for comprehensive assistance through your troubling times.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Oregon Illinois

Carlson Bier – Your Trusted Ally for Dog Bite Injuries

As a premier personal injury law firm, Carlson Bier has an established track record of passionately advocating on behalf of victims suffering from dog bite injuries in Illinois. Each year, thousands of innocent men, women, and children face traumatic encounters with uncontrolled dogs leading to serious physical wounds and emotional traumas.

Dog bites result in numerous complications that can extend beyond the immediate surface injury into deeper health concerns like infection risks and the contraction of diseases such as Rabies. Emotional and psychological trauma may also arise long after the initial incident has occurred. This reality makes it paramount for an injured party to seek both medical attention and legal assistance swiftly after a dog bite.

At Carlson Bier, we are committed to providing expert counsel regarding Dog Bite laws in Illinois which place stringent responsibilities on pet owners. When these obligations are not met causing harm, they are liable under civil law provisions guided by rules specific to this field commonly referred to as the “One-Bite” rule or “Strict Liability”.

In Illinois, for instance:

• The “One-Bite” rule states that if a dog had never bitten before or shown vicious tendencies, the owner is generally free from liability.

• However, conversely within “Strict Liability”, even if there was no prior knowledge of aggression by the dog, it doesn’t exempt owners from being held accountable if their pet injures someone.

This fine balance necessitates skilled representation legally savvy enough to navigate intricacies surrounding local animal control ordinances while adequately representing your case needs. By aligning on cases falling under ‘strict liability’, where proving negligence isn’t necessary – we significantly boost settlement odds favorably compensating clients for medical expenses incurred due to another’s callous neglect.

Our team at Carlson Bier stands relentless against any inadequate defense downplaying legitimate claims based simply because pets are loved family members too – after all – a victim’s well-being should always take precedence. We are dedicated to helping you recover costs for:

• Medical Treatments – These include immediate medical attention, rabies vaccinations, antibiotics, or plastic surgery if required.

• Psychological Counselling – Often overlooked, the emotional trauma from a dog bite can be as damaging as the physical injuries.

• Lost Wages – As many people require an extended leave of absence to heal physically and emotionally after such distressing incidents.

Pursuing justice in these instances may seem overwhelming but entrusting your situation with our legal professionals ensures meticulous attention to every step of this challenging journey. It isn’t just about securing compensation; it represents validating your traumatic ordeal and striving towards preventing future similar instances occurring by promoting responsible pet ownership through accountability.

At Carlson Bier, we believe knowledge is empowering when facing adversity. Our devoted attorneys are here for you during this incredibly difficult time offering comprehensive services from assessing evidence strength, guidance about possible defenses or what type of damages claims will most likely succeed for our clients going forward.

Time plays a critical role in successfully pursuing personal injury cases– with Illinois law typically allowing only two years from an injury date to file lawsuits against at-fault individuals. This makes it crucial that victims contact experienced personal injury lawyers immediately following their unfortunate encounter ensuring procedural protocols are followed within designated timelines thereby enhancing opportunities for rightful compensation awards commensurate with inflicted suffering and hardship level.

We invite you now to click on the button below. Let us assist you in determining how much your case is worth beyond mere speculation owing to over 60-years combined experience offering solidity against life’s unexpected turns thanks due diligence never compromising quality service nor sacrificing integrity upholding fairness principles assuring peace amidst upheaval during such stressful times leaning on Carlson Bier – geared right towards optimizing achievable success together!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Oregon Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Oregon

Areas of Practice in Oregon

Cycling Incidents

Dedicated to legal representation for people injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' carelessness or perilous conditions.

Thermal Damages

Giving specialist legal assistance for victims of serious burn injuries caused by mishaps or misconduct.

Physician Misconduct

Extending expert legal advice for clients affected by healthcare malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Items Fault

Addressing cases involving dangerous products, supplying expert legal help to victims affected by product malfunctions.

Geriatric Abuse

Advocating for the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to mistreatment in nursing homes environments, ensuring justice.

Slip & Fall Mishaps

Specialist in managing trip accident cases, providing legal support to clients seeking recovery for their losses.

Neonatal Wounds

Supplying legal aid for households affected by medical misconduct resulting in infant injuries.

Motor Incidents

Mishaps: Dedicated to assisting clients of car accidents get appropriate settlement for injuries and harm.

Motorcycle Collisions

Committed to providing legal assistance for victims involved in bike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for losses.

Truck Collision

Delivering professional legal assistance for victims involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing rightful claims for hurts.

Worksite Incidents

Committed to defending employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or carelessness.

Neurological Impairments

Expert in offering compassionate legal advice for clients suffering from neurological injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Attack Damages

Specialized in dealing with cases for clients who have suffered wounds from dog bites or animal assaults.

Cross-walker Incidents

Expert in legal representation for walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering restitution.

Unjust Demise

Working for relatives affected by a wrongful death, providing caring and experienced legal representation to ensure redress.

Spinal Cord Impairment

Specializing in advocating for persons with vertebral damage, offering professional legal support to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​