...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Car Accident Attorney in Ottawa

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When unfortunate, unforeseen circumstances such as car accidents occur in Ottawa, the representation of an experienced attorney is essential. The Carlson Bier group shines amongst personal injury lawyer firms due to our expertise in handling car accident cases and delivering desirable outcomes for our clients. What sets us apart? Our deep understanding of Illinois laws combined with proven litigation skills allows for meticulous navigation of complex legal processes associated with auto collisions. Whether you are seeking compensation for medical bills or mental anguish resultant from a vehicular mishap- we are committed to extending robust advocacy on your behalf. With Carlson Bier, you will be working closely with vigilant legal professionals focused solely on your case until satisfaction is delivered. Every client’s needs and rights are recognized unequivocally — it’s this pledge that makes us a top consideration when dealing with aftermaths of motor incidence related issues.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Car Accident Lawyers in Ottawa Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we pride ourselves on being the go-to experts for personal injury cases across Illinois. Our robust understanding of car accidents and their complex legal ramifications spans decades, allowing us to represent you competently and effectively in pursuit of your claims.

Car accidents often introduce a maelstrom of issues: physical trauma, medical expenses, loss of income due to recuperation time, property damage along with prolonged emotional distress. At such a challenging period in your life, our team at Carlson Bier steps in as your legal advocate.

We recognize that each accident’s circumstances are unique; hence, we tailor-fit our service based on your situation—be it litigation against an offending driver or pursuing claims from insurance companies sidestepping their responsibilities. We conduct thorough investigations to cleanly establish liability and relevant laws following a car crash incident:

– Determining liability: This process involves proving negligence occurred on behalf of another party leading up to the accident.

– Understanding contributory fault rules: In Illinois, if you are partially responsible for the crash—up to 50%—you can still recover damages from other at-fault parties.

– Pursuing claims and negotiation with insurance companies: We vigorously ensure fair treatment and just compensation from insurance providers for all victims involved.

Moreover, despite the complexities involved after an auto accident calamity — particularly pertaining to Illinois statute of limitations for filling personal injury claims (typically within two years from the date of the incident), our dedicated lawyers will guide you every step along this journey ensuring no stone is left unturned.

Our expertise lies not only in handling various complications arising from a personal injury lawsuit but also in parlaying these situations into favorable results for each client that entrusts us with their representation:

– Proven track record: Combining years of experience over numerous successful cases,

– Personalized attention: We prioritize open communication lines between clients and attorneys

– No fee unless we win principle: You pay nothing unless we succeed in securing your compensation.

Our collaborative team approach further distinguishes us. Carlson Bier lawyers all contribute their unique perspectives and nuanced legal insights, ensuring the strategies formulated for your case are honed to perfection—an advantage that has consistently proven beneficial for our clients.

With an arsenal of proficient skillets at our disposal and factual persuasion leveraging evidence collected pertaining to your accident, our attorneys meticulously build a strong case aimed at achieving maximum compensation ensuring you are fully compensated so you can focus on what matters—healing and restoring normalcy back into your life. At our core, we believe every personal injury victim is deserving of rightful justice along with fair financial recovery aiding their rehabilitation process after such unfortunate incidents.

Yet, while it’s paramount to educate ourselves on these laws and legal options available following any car collisions, the complexity concerning these protocols coupled with the critical timeline constraints make professional assistance integral—affirming why we are here leading this charge…To stand by you against negligent drivers causing distress due to recklessness or perhaps even mal-intention leveled up against you or loved ones caught up in a car crash’s dreadful aftermath.

We urge anyone faced with personal injuries from auto accidents reaching across Illinois terrain not to navigate this treacherous journey alone but let experts like us shoulder this burden. We invite you now to click the button below and discover exactly how much value lies within your case – because everyone should have an opportunity at righting wrongs suffered unjustly.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Ottawa Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Car Accident FAQ​

The most common causes of car accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause drivers to lose control of their vehicles.
  • Vehicle defects: Defective vehicles can cause accidents in a variety of ways.
  • Weather conditions: Rain, snow, and ice can make roads slick and dangerous.

If you are involved in a car accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a car accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a car accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a car accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

In a car accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

    Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your vehicle.

    Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for car accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Ottawa

Areas of Practice in Ottawa

Pedal Cycle Crashes

Focused on legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others's indifference or risky conditions.

Burn Injuries

Extending skilled legal advice for individuals of severe burn injuries caused by mishaps or misconduct.

Clinical Negligence

Extending experienced legal support for patients affected by medical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Commodities Obligation

Addressing cases involving defective products, supplying expert legal guidance to customers affected by faulty goods.

Geriatric Abuse

Advocating for the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to misconduct in nursing homes environments, ensuring restitution.

Fall and Stumble Mishaps

Specialist in dealing with fall and trip accident cases, providing legal representation to individuals seeking recovery for their damages.

Neonatal Damages

Supplying legal help for loved ones affected by medical misconduct resulting in birth injuries.

Motor Collisions

Crashes: Concentrated on aiding sufferers of car accidents receive appropriate payout for wounds and harm.

Scooter Mishaps

Focused on providing legal assistance for victims involved in scooter accidents, ensuring just recovery for damages.

Trucking Crash

Providing expert legal advice for victims involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recompense for harms.

Construction Mishaps

Engaged in supporting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or negligence.

Brain Damages

Focused on providing specialized legal assistance for patients suffering from brain injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Injuries

Adept at handling cases for clients who have suffered injuries from canine attacks or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Collisions

Focused on legal assistance for walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering recovery.

Wrongful Demise

Striving for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, offering empathetic and expert legal assistance to ensure restitution.

Spine Trauma

Specializing in representing clients with vertebral damage, offering dedicated legal assistance to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​