...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Pontiac

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

We understand the devastating impact of pedestrian accidents. At Carlson Bier, we’re dedicated to safeguarding your rights and interests following such traumatic incidents. Our experienced attorneys specialize in personal injury law with a particular focus on cases involving pedestrian casualties across various locales, including Pontiac. We possess an outstanding track record due to our comprehensive understanding of Illinois State regulations concerning pedestrian safety and compensation rights.

Through an intricate process, Carlson Bier prides themselves on expertly navigating every case intricacies that really make them stand out as top-tier legal representatives for victims of unfortunate pedestrian mishaps in Ponitac without actually indicating their physical presence there. Our firm aggressively represents clients who have been injured due to careless drivers or inadequate infrastructure management, tirelessly pursuing all corners of justice on their behalf.

Our commitment is consistent – achieving maximum monetary recovery while ensuring the seamless restoration back into everyday life after such harrowing occurrences – because this priceless aspect amplifies why Carlson Bier should be your premier consideration when thinking about representation for your Pedestrian Accident related concerns.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Pontiac Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are a distinguished team of personal injury attorneys based in Illinois. Our mission is to represent and champion your legal rights with thoroughness and integrity so you can obtain the monetary compensation that’s rightly yours. One particular area we specialize in, which often results in severe injuries for victims, is pedestrian accidents. This complex field involves understanding both traffic laws and the intricate dynamics of these unfortunate scenarios.

A pedestrian accident occurs when someone walking or running by footfall falls victim to an impact with any form of vehicular transportation – cars, motorcycles, bicycles or even public buses. The harm that ensues generally tends to be very serious due to the lack of protection afforded to pedestrians compared to vehicle drivers or riders. Therefore, it becomes extremely consequential for victims of such accidents to seek rehabilitative support and economic repair that will allow them a full recovery.

There are several key things you should know in these circumstances:

• There are distinct differences between automobile accidents versus pedestrian incidents mainly because pedestrians have no inherent physical safeguards.

• In many cases, crossing the street without a designated crosswalk or signal may not necessarily disqualify you from receiving compensation.

• If the driver has committed illegal actions during your incident (like speeding or driving under influence), those facts strengthen your lawsuit considerably.

Knowing where fault lies in these situations can significantly transform possibilities into advantages for clients like yourself. It’s essential to keep accurate documentation on hand concerning all aspects pertinent to your incident – medical records, police testimony if applicable, witness accounts – as these become irreplaceable resources during settlement discussions and court trials.

Now let’s factor in Illinois law nuances; our state enforces comparative negligence rules meaning that even if the victim shares some part responsibility for their own mishap- say broad daylight jaywalking across a fast-moving intersection – they may still retain eligibility for damages awarded proportionate to others’ fault percentage too! However navigating this system does demand expert proficiency, which is where Carlson Bier comes into play.

Our dedicated team of personal injury attorneys has exhaustive experience with handling these distinctly tricky legalities ensuring the best outcome possible for our clients. Our rigorous preparation and forceful negotiation tactics consistently aid in procuring top-tier settlements and verdicts. We invite you to envision a daunting journey made less strenuous due to our professional guidance: From sorting through intricate medical reports, filing insurance claims, gathering key evidence to fiercely representing you in court if required.

Being largely client-driven at Carlson Bier means we not only prioritize your case but also ensure compassionate counseling consuming minimal time from your daily routines whilst attaining maximum benefits- all at no up-front cost! Because we firmly believe that quality representation isn’t solely about winning; it’s about building relationships grounded on trust too.

Remember, hiring trusted counsel is vital to safeguarding your interests in what can otherwise be an overwhelming process after suffering a pedestrian accident happily toner team here at Carlson Bier is ready and equipped to support you throughout this challenging ordeal.

If you or a loved one have been unfortunate victims of any such incident or similar traffic accident situations either as drivers, cyclists or pedestrians themselves ,don’t marginalize the gravity of the situation by trying to navigate this labyrinthine procedure by yourself thinking its unnecessary financial strain – when definitive help from us could just be one click away! Are you curious how much compensation could possibly be waiting for you? Then don’t hesitate – click on the button below right now and give yourself the peace of mind deserved knowing exactly what your case is worth. You owe it yourself for having endured unfair dents both physically and financially in circumstances possibly beyond control so act today securing maximal restitution under Illinois laws rightfully advocating equal rights for pedestrians too!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Pontiac Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Pontiac

Areas of Practice in Pontiac

Bicycle Crashes

Proficient in legal assistance for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others's recklessness or unsafe conditions.

Thermal Injuries

Supplying professional legal support for victims of grave burn injuries caused by occurrences or carelessness.

Medical Negligence

Delivering experienced legal advice for victims affected by hospital malpractice, including surgical errors.

Goods Obligation

Addressing cases involving problematic products, offering skilled legal help to individuals affected by faulty goods.

Elder Misconduct

Supporting the rights of elders who have been subjected to abuse in nursing homes environments, ensuring protection.

Tumble & Slip Mishaps

Adept in managing tumble accident cases, providing legal representation to sufferers seeking compensation for their suffering.

Neonatal Wounds

Delivering legal support for families affected by medical carelessness resulting in infant injuries.

Vehicle Mishaps

Incidents: Committed to aiding sufferers of car accidents obtain reasonable recompense for hurts and destruction.

Bike Accidents

Specializing in providing legal services for motorcyclists involved in bike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for harm.

Semi Incident

Extending expert legal assistance for individuals involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing rightful compensation for injuries.

Building Site Incidents

Engaged in supporting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or carelessness.

Head Harms

Expert in offering expert legal assistance for patients suffering from cerebral injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Injuries

Skilled in managing cases for persons who have suffered traumas from puppy bites or animal assaults.

Jogger Accidents

Focused on legal support for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering claims.

Wrongful Passing

Fighting for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, supplying sensitive and professional legal support to ensure restitution.

Backbone Damage

Dedicated to defending clients with spine impairments, offering expert legal guidance to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​