Bicycle Accidents in Ringwood

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Carlson Bier is highly acclaimed as an astute law firm specializing in Bicycle Accident cases. Our profound understanding of the nuances related to these incidents helps us deliver unparalleled legal services that safeguard your right and ensure justice. Attuned with Illinois regulations, our acumen steers seamlessly through complex litigation processes, committed to holding negligent parties accountable and seeking maximum compensation for the victims’ losses. With Carlson Bier as your chosen advocate, experience meticulous attention to details backed by a robust conviction to fight relentlessly on your behalf—an unyielding commitment mirrored across all personal injury lawsuits we undertake. Although not limited by geography, our reputation reverberates far beyond our physical office location resonating strongly within Ringwood’s community too — resultingfrom multitudes of successful case outcomes that speak louder than words could ever do! Count on Carlson Bier for exemplary advocacy in bicycle accident-related legal needs; where excellence meets integrity—paving the pathway towards rightful resolution and turning those wheels toward justice!

About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Ringwood Illinois

Navigating the aftermath of a bicycle accident can be challenging, and that’s where Carlson Bier steps in. We’re an authority on personal injury law based in Illinois, offering steadfast legal support tailored to those who have been victims of a bicycle-related incident. Our expertise is rooted in years of navigating the specifics around such accidents, as we prioritize value-based education for our clients – ensuring you’re informed every step of the way.

In defining ‘Bicycle Accidents’, it refers broadly to any event where a cyclist has suffered harm due to the negligence or reckless behavior of another party. This might involve other cyclists, pedestrians, automobile drivers and even local authorities failing to provide safe conditions for cycling. These situations often bring about physical injuries but don’t discount psychological trauma and financial loss.

Several key aspects that influence such cases include:

– The cause: Be it hit-and-run incidents or roadway hazards intended by third parties like construction firms.

– Liability: Depending on circumstance, this can land with single or multiple parties.

– Nature & extent of injuries: The physiological damage incurred plays into deciding compensations.

– Material losses & emotional trauma experienced: Damages also cover the cost of bike repairs and mental duress caused by your experience.

Understanding these aspects will aid in forming definitive strategies for tackling each case individually – an approach prioritized by us at Carlson Bier. We insist on acquainting our clients with their rights under Illinois’s stringent laws concerning negligent infliction enacted upon cyclists.

It’s crucial to note that statutes applied within Illinois require swift action post any accident – providing you’ve obtained critical medical care first, filing your claim should ideally be next priority. Ensure immediate help from law enforcement officials onsite; their reports hold major weightage during trials.

While dealing with insurance companies may seem daunting initially, entrusting us simplifies this usually complicated process – thanks partly to our adept negotiation skills pressed against unreasonable settlement offers commonly proposed by insurers.

Beyond these, another noteworthy aspect is the legal rights cyclists are entitled to. Notably, Illinois law reads cyclists as they would any other vehicle on the road – meaning you possess rightful claim to your lane like any motorist barring certain instances where bike lanes should be utilized.

Moreover, ‘dooring’ – an incident concerning car occupants opening their doors into a bicyclist’s pathway – places liable parties with heavy fines up-to $1000 under Section 11-1407 of Illinois State Law. Our experience dealing with cases featuring this among causes predisposes us towards seeking maximum compensation in such situations.

Choosing Carlson Bier ensures personalized attention given our dedicated lawyers solely focused on personal injury litigation, particularly around bicycle accidents. We leverage keen interest in case histories along with first-hand understanding based upon years’ worth of managing similar trials prior.

By interpreting complexities within your claims process or court proceedings for you, we maximize chances at winning just compensations due. The imperative goal being restoring your everyday life pre-accident while adequately addressing losses incurred and adjusting the same suitably. Furthering this cause materially impacts enforcing increased safety measures universally across all Illinois cycling infrastructures too.

Enlisting professional help early maximizes results favoring victims; it’s best pursuing well-deserved remuneration alongside ensuring justice served covers emotional & psychological healing beyond physical damages alone.

In summation, turning to Carlson Bier means aligning with comprehensive expertise dedicated towards understanding unique circumstances presented by each case individually. It embodies assurance where every legal detail doesn’t escape scrutiny while navigating complicated spaces frequently overwhelming for unprepared victims alone; Truly encapsulating our unwavering commitment towards delivering rightfully deserved justice implicitly aligned to each client’s welfare and peace of mind.

Click below now to find out what your case might be worth without delay! Let’s examine how our skilled attorneys at Carlson Bier can assist in proficiently discerning the true value attributed to restitution owed by liable parties. Allow this initial step towards reclaiming control back in your hands to be the foundation for reestablishing normalcy in your life once more.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Ringwood Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Ringwood

Areas of Practice in Ringwood

Pedal Cycle Collisions

Focused on legal advocacy for people injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' lack of care or risky conditions.

Thermal Burns

Offering professional legal services for individuals of grave burn injuries caused by mishaps or recklessness.

Clinical Carelessness

Extending professional legal support for persons affected by healthcare malpractice, including negligent care.

Items Obligation

Managing cases involving faulty products, providing adept legal help to customers affected by faulty goods.

Aged Neglect

Advocating for the rights of seniors who have been subjected to abuse in care facilities environments, ensuring restitution.

Fall and Trip Mishaps

Skilled in addressing tumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to victims seeking compensation for their injuries.

Birth Traumas

Offering legal guidance for households affected by medical negligence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Car Crashes

Collisions: Focused on supporting sufferers of car accidents receive fair payout for damages and impairment.

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Specializing in providing legal advice for victims involved in scooter accidents, ensuring justice for injuries.

Truck Collision

Offering adept legal representation for persons involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing fair recompense for harms.

Construction Site Accidents

Focused on representing staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or misconduct.

Cerebral Traumas

Dedicated to delivering dedicated legal advice for patients suffering from head injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Wounds

Proficient in tackling cases for clients who have suffered harms from dog attacks or wildlife encounters.

Cross-walker Accidents

Focused on legal support for walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering damages.

Wrongful Passing

Striving for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, delivering empathetic and adept legal guidance to ensure redress.

Backbone Injury

Committed to assisting individuals with spinal cord injuries, offering compassionate legal services to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer