...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Robinson

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’re a Robinson resident suffering from the effects of a dog bite injury, it’s crucial to secure the legal expertise required to seek fair compensation. The Carlson Bier attorney group is proficient in Illinois personal injury law, specifically related to dog bite injuries. Our exemplary record testifies our commitment and success in championing victims’ rights, ensuring justice served commensurate with your suffering. Our wealth of experience allows us to comprehend the intricacies surrounding any canine attack case skillfully and efficiently. We will advocate on your behalf against responsible parties or insurance companies reluctant to provide rightful recompense for medical expenses, emotional distress or any rehabilitation costs incurred due to your unfortunate circumstance attesting why Carlson Bier should be your preferred option while seeking legal assistance for dog bite injuries in this trying period. Seeking accountability doesn’t have be daunting with our expert team by your side on every step of this journey.
Choose Carlson Bier – where justice awaits you.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Robinson Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in a multitude of personal injury cases including Dog Bite Injuries that can come with profound physical and emotional after-effects which may change your life or the lives of a loved one permanently. As leading attorneys based in Illinois, our mission is to provide critical legal representation and compassionate counsel during these trying times. We understand that dealing with such stressful situations can be overwhelming, especially when juggling medical bills, loss of income due to injuries, and handling insurance negotiations.

Dog bites are sadly common within our communities and can result in severe wounds causing both physical harm such as lacerations, infections, nerve damage or psychological trauma like anxiety or stress disorders. Our dedicated team is fully equipped to handle these cases delicately yet assertively ensuring you get justice while educating about the law surrounding dog bite injuries.

The legal dynamics underlying dog bite incidents revolve around owner liability. The dramatic point here being – the State of Illinois applies a ‘Strict Liability’ theory for dog bites wherein the pet’s owner is usually held liable if their animal caused an injury without needing an individual to prove any negligence on behalf of the owner. Notwithstanding these principles generally favor victims, they must still demonstrate:

• The defendant owned the animal

• That they did not provoke it

• They were conducting themselves peaceably at the time

• They had a legal right to be where they were injured when bitten

However complex this appears; know you have capable partners ready at Carlson Bier who will break down this process simplistically assuring your rights are protected every step of the way.

Having comprehensive knowledge about laws relevant to personal injuries from animals is fundamental; however visualizing application scenarios helps us deepen our understanding:

If anyone sustains injuries directly because of being bitten by a canine then according to Section 16 (1), 510 ILCS (Illinois Compiled Statutes) “Animal attacks or injuries”, owners become legally obligated for damages. The keyword here being ‘direct’ cause as it indicates that if a dog causes an individual to fall, causing injuries – owners may escape liability.

In instances involving less specific scenarios surrounding dogs biting another dog or their owner, statues become vague and the plaintiff must demonstrate negligent handling of the animal leading to injury. It is crucial remembering interpretations hinge largely on case-specific details.

Lastly let’s shed some light upon Illinois’ one-bite rule. This unlike some states doesn’t follow the antiquated ‘one-bite rule,’ wherein owners are liable only when they knew (or ought to have known) about their pet’s aggressive tendencies prior. In Illinois, owners are responsible no matter whether their pet has previously shown such behavior, providing victims additional legal protections.

At Carlson Bier, we firmly believe knowledge empowers you, our distinguished client; enabling us jointly approach your situation with utmost agility rooted in fact-based action plans personalized for your circumstances. We encourage you to click on the “Find Out What Your Case is Worth” button below allowing us expertly assess all feasible aspects driving due benefits toward you. Remember every step taken today helps shape restored tomorrow!

We stand committed to assisting every way we can should you be unfortunate enough experiencing a dog bite injury anywhere in our beloved Illinois state or nationwide! Rest assured knowing we remember our duty to respect all aspects of local regulations making sure never crossing lines suggesting physical offices beyond actual locations – act strictly against ethos practiced at Carlson Bier & Associates.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Robinson Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Robinson

Areas of Practice in Robinson

Cycling Crashes

Focused on legal representation for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' carelessness or dangerous conditions.

Scald Burns

Supplying adept legal assistance for patients of intense burn injuries caused by mishaps or recklessness.

Healthcare Negligence

Offering expert legal representation for victims affected by hospital malpractice, including surgical errors.

Merchandise Fault

Managing cases involving dangerous products, extending expert legal help to consumers affected by faulty goods.

Aged Misconduct

Protecting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to malpractice in nursing homes environments, ensuring fairness.

Slip & Tumble Mishaps

Professional in addressing tumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to sufferers seeking compensation for their harm.

Newborn Harms

Delivering legal assistance for households affected by medical malpractice resulting in newborn injuries.

Auto Crashes

Crashes: Devoted to helping victims of car accidents gain equitable recompense for injuries and harm.

Motorcycle Accidents

Dedicated to providing legal services for victims involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring justice for damages.

Big Rig Incident

Extending professional legal representation for victims involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing just recompense for injuries.

Worksite Mishaps

Dedicated to supporting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or irresponsibility.

Cognitive Impairments

Specializing in extending compassionate legal representation for patients suffering from head injuries due to accidents.

Dog Attack Traumas

Specialized in managing cases for persons who have suffered injuries from canine attacks or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Collisions

Specializing in legal representation for walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering restitution.

Undeserved Demise

Working for families affected by a wrongful death, offering understanding and professional legal services to ensure compensation.

Backbone Trauma

Focused on assisting clients with vertebral damage, offering expert legal services to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer