...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Saint Anne

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you reside in Saint Anne and are seeking exceptional legal representation for dog bite injuries, Carlson Bier is a distinguished choice. Their expertise lies in unfortunate cases of canine aggression, providing comprehensive support to victims through this harrowing experience. Dog bite injuries can have severe emotional and physical consequences; thus it’s critical to engage with an accomplished group of attorneys like Carlson Bier who specialize in this niche area.

Committed to offering empathetic yet aggressive advocacy for their clients, they employ an exhaustive understanding of Illinois statutes relevant to such injuries, ensuring maximum compensation claims are enabled. Expertise coupled with dedication defines the service that Carlson Bier provides – diligently navigating complex regulatory processes while prioritizing your wellbeing deserves commendation.

Victims usually face overwhelming stress post-incident but choosing Carlson Bier puts you at ease by knowing each phase of the lawsuit will be professionally handled as they leave no stone unturned for safeguarding client’s interest. Offering robust lawyer-client communication combined with effectual negotiation strategies positions them as a premier personal injury law firm.This competence translates into favorable outcomes when pursuing justice for dog bite incidents.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Saint Anne Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are dedicated to providing in-depth legal insight and representation for personal injury cases. We take great importance in educating our clients about the legal aspects that come into play in instances of personal injuries, such as Dog Bite Injuries.

Dog bites can lead to significant physical harm and emotional trauma. Illinois law recognizes this perilous nature of dog bite incidents and provides critical safeguards for victims. A key aspect worth understanding is a provision under the Illinois Animal Control Act, which holds dog owners strictly liable if their pet injures someone unprovoked. Notably, this liability stands irrespective of whether the dog has bitten someone before or not.

• The injured person must prove that they were behaving peaceably around the dog.

• They need to demonstrate they were at a location where they could legally be.

• The attack was without any provocation on their part.

Understanding these points is crucial because failing to meet these conditions might obstruct your ability to claim compensation for a dog bite injury under the Act.

Medical expenses resulting from a dog bite tend interfere significantly with a victim’s financial health. Illinois law accounts for this and permits victims to seek retribution for various costs such as Emergency Room care, surgeries, medication, physical therapy, psychological counseling and even reconstructive surgery in severe cases.

However, it’s vital to remember that insurance companies often try to minimize payouts whenever possible; therefore:

• Never sign anything or make statements on record without consulting your attorney first.

• Be aware that what you say could potentially be used against you.

• Seek immediate medical attention even if injuries initially seem minor – some complications may arise later.

At Carlson Bier based in Illinois, we are committed advocates working tirelessly on behalf of those suffering from personal injuries like dog bites. As seasoned personal injury lawyers utilizing comprehensive knowledge of state laws matched by years of practical experience – we understand exactly how traumatic these events can be both physically and emotionally.

Our approach is crafted around empathy, understanding, and meticulous attention to detail. When representing you, we consider every facet of your situation – from the direct financial impact to the psychological toll such an event would take on a person’s life.

With us handling your dog bite injury case, you can have peace in knowing that we will relentlessly pursue justice on your behalf. We value transparency tremendously and thus constantly update our clients about their case progress and any potential hurdles encountered during pursuit for justice.

We appreciate that dealing with a legal battle alongside recovering from an injury is burdensome, which is why Carlson Bier oversees all aspects of your claim process including: gathering necessary proof; negotiating aggressively with insurance companies; preparing meticulously-crafted litigation strategies fit for court if required – effectively shouldering this burden while you focus solely on healing.

Every case is unique in its complexities and deserves personalized attention. A standardized approach may underestimate the devastating consequences a dog bite could inflict on an individual’s life or overestimate certain factors like anticipated medical costs – leading to inadequate compensation. Therefore, it’s critical that you get proper representation suited specifically for YOUR needs.

Pressing a claim with inappropriate valuation might lead not only to delayed justice but also further financial plunge due to under-compensation – another reason why seasoned professionals like those at Carlson Bier are quintessential in navigating through such situations efficiently.

Are you overwhelmed with uncertainty regarding how much compensation your dog bite injury case can garner? Simply click the button below! Our competent team offers free case evaluations providing not just insight into potential monetary worth but outlining realistic expectations based on nuances specific to your scenario. Let our trusted legal counsel guide you towards gaining rightful recompense fittingly reflective of losses suffered due to someone else’s negligence or irresponsibility. Act now for brighter tomorrows immune from past uncertainties associated with negligent dog bite occurrences.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Saint Anne Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Saint Anne

Areas of Practice in Saint Anne

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Specializing in legal representation for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others's carelessness or perilous conditions.

Fire Damages

Providing expert legal support for sufferers of grave burn injuries caused by incidents or recklessness.

Clinical Incompetence

Offering expert legal assistance for persons affected by physician malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Goods Responsibility

Managing cases involving unsafe products, supplying adept legal assistance to victims affected by harmful products.

Aged Misconduct

Defending the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to neglect in aged care environments, ensuring fairness.

Stumble and Trip Occurrences

Adept in handling trip accident cases, providing legal services to persons seeking recovery for their suffering.

Neonatal Injuries

Delivering legal aid for kin affected by medical malpractice resulting in neonatal injuries.

Vehicle Incidents

Crashes: Committed to supporting patients of car accidents obtain reasonable recompense for hurts and losses.

Scooter Accidents

Specializing in providing representation for motorcyclists involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring justice for losses.

18-Wheeler Collision

Ensuring adept legal assistance for victims involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recovery for hurts.

Building Site Accidents

Concentrated on advocating for laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or carelessness.

Brain Traumas

Expert in offering expert legal representation for persons suffering from head injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Damages

Expertise in dealing with cases for clients who have suffered damages from dog attacks or animal assaults.

Pedestrian Collisions

Focused on legal services for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Unjust Loss

Striving for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, offering understanding and professional legal services to ensure justice.

Vertebral Impairment

Specializing in supporting victims with vertebral damage, offering dedicated legal representation to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​