...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Burn Injuries in Shorewood

Burn Injuries Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When it comes to handling burn injuries, Carlson Bier is an indispensable advocate you need in your corner. Our proficient team of attorneys provides expert guidance for the inhabitants of Shorewood and offers a lifeline during some of the most distressing times resulting from serious burn incidents. We bring vast knowledge, profound expertise, and relentless dedication to every case we represent. Recognizing that every situation is unique, we pledge tailored legal solutions designed specifically for each of our clients’ circumstances. Our deep understanding and insightful tact when navigating Burn Injuries law can significantly increase chances for favorable outcomes. Unwaveringly committed to fight for rightful compensation after traumatic burns incidents., we eagerly go above ordinary efforts making your path towards justice smoother amidst unnerving phases post-incident.. Rest assured with Carlson Bier’s excellence in serving justice without territorial limits as mainstay representation; because where you are doesn’t change how relentlessly dedicated we’re fighting on your behalf while according with Illinois laws.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Burn Injuries Lawyers in Shorewood Illinois

Burn injuries are a serious matter and often involve more than just physical damage. At Carlson Bier, we understand this. As an esteemed personal injury law firm based in Illinois, our dedicated team of professionals specializes in burn injury cases, providing diligent representation for victims who’ve suffered these harrowing experiences.

Understanding the varied nature and causes of burn injuries is critical to seeking justice. Consequently, there’s a substantial need to grasp the primary types of burns – first-degree burns which affect only the outer layer of skin; second-degree burns that affect both the epidermis and dermis; third-degree burns damaging down to tissue layers beneath the skin; fourth-degree burns that extend into muscle or bone.

It’s essential also to comprehend sources of these distressing wounds besides fire-related incidents. Electrical equipment, harmful chemicals, radiation from X-rays or specific cancer treatments can all inflict significant harm equivalent to thermal-burn traumas.

An attribute deserving equal attention is severity grading. A minor burn may cover less than 10% of body area (not including face or genitals), contrasting significantly with a major ballistic injury covering over 20%-30%, possibly involving hands, feet or joints.

Unquestionably significant is realization that emotional trauma frequently accompanies physical torment during recovery due in particular to extensive rehabilitation many victims necessitate alongside possible cosmetic surgeries after severe disfigurements have been endured.

At Carlson Bier our mission revolves around neither treating your case as mere statistic nor underestimating any facet impacting your plight. We underscore our commitment by tirelessly working on your behalf pursuing every available legal compensation avenue while addressing needs unique to situations faced by each client we serve. Key elements we focus on include:

• Understanding: Recognizing complexities associated with various burn categories informs our approach enabling comprehensive strategizing.

• Experience: Our credentials span multiple years aiding countless individuals equipping us definitively for representation across diverse scenarios ensuring you receive genuinely expert assistance.

• Dedication: Our resolve to provide you most favourable outcomes underscores everything we do. Our attorneys invest substantial time meticulously investigating incident specifics, consulting with expert witnesses if necessary while persistently advocating for your interests throughout.

Such focus makes possible identifying and addressing elements pivotal in determining case success like demonstrating negligence – proving that someone else’s recklessness or deliberate actions resulted directly in your injuries; assessing immediate and long-term medical expenses associated; evaluating intangible costs such as loss of life enjoyment, emotional trauma or permanent physical disfigurement.

Overall, the Carlson Bier team believes in relentlessly striving to assure optimum support throughout this challenging period – keeping clients fully informed about progress while consistently pursuing justice they rightly deserve.

The ongoing after-effects of a burn injury can be physically debilitating and emotionally devastating, making it absolutely crucial that you seek highly-qualified professional assistance guiding you towards the rightful compensation required facilitating recovery. To understand how comprehensive our approach is, coupled with recognizing exactly how much difference partnering with us could make in navigating your claim successfully, click on the button below right now. Learn first-hand what becoming another unpaid statistic feels like compared to discovering just how much potential value could indeed await your specific case from one decisive click made today.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Shorewood Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Burn Accident FAQ​

There are three main types of burn injuries:

  • First-degree burns: These burns affect the outer layer of skin, the epidermis. They cause redness, pain, and swelling.
  • Second-degree burns: These burns affect the epidermis and the dermis, the second layer of skin. They cause redness, pain, swelling, and blistering.
  • Third-degree burns: These burns destroy the epidermis and the dermis, and can also damage the underlying tissues. They cause white, leathery, or charred skin.

Burn injuries can be caused by a variety of factors, including:

  • Heat: This includes flames, hot liquids, steam, and hot objects.
  • Electricity: Electrical burns can be caused by contact with live wires or outlets.
  • Chemicals: Chemical burns can be caused by exposure to acids, alkalis, and other corrosive substances.
  • Radiation: Radiation burns can be caused by exposure to ultraviolet (UV) rays from the sun or to other types of radiation.

The signs and symptoms of a burn injury will vary depending on the severity of the burn. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Redness
  • Pain
  • Swelling
  • Blistering
  • Charred skin
  • Difficulty breathing
  • Shock

The treatment options for burn injuries will vary depending on the severity of the burn. However, some common treatment options include:

  • First-degree burns: These burns typically heal on their own within a few days. However, it is important to keep the area clean and moist.
  • Second-degree burns: These burns may need to be treated with medication or surgery.
  • Third-degree burns: These burns typically require surgery and skin grafts.

.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit if your burn injury was caused by the negligence or recklessness of another person or party. A burn injury lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Shorewood

Areas of Practice in Shorewood

Cycling Collisions

Dedicated to legal services for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' lack of care or risky conditions.

Burn Burns

Offering expert legal advice for individuals of major burn injuries caused by accidents or misconduct.

Hospital Incompetence

Offering professional legal advice for patients affected by physician malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Goods Fault

Managing cases involving dangerous products, delivering professional legal support to individuals affected by product malfunctions.

Geriatric Misconduct

Supporting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to neglect in elderly care environments, ensuring justice.

Fall and Fall Injuries

Expert in dealing with fall and trip accident cases, providing legal advice to persons seeking restitution for their injuries.

Newborn Damages

Supplying legal support for households affected by medical carelessness resulting in neonatal injuries.

Motor Crashes

Incidents: Concentrated on guiding individuals of car accidents get appropriate remuneration for hurts and harm.

Motorbike Crashes

Dedicated to providing legal services for bikers involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring justice for traumas.

Trucking Accident

Providing specialist legal assistance for persons involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recompense for harms.

Building Mishaps

Committed to assisting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or negligence.

Cognitive Damages

Committed to delivering expert legal advice for patients suffering from head injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Damages

Adept at addressing cases for individuals who have suffered traumas from dog bites or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Accidents

Focused on legal advocacy for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering claims.

Wrongful Loss

Striving for relatives affected by a wrongful death, delivering understanding and expert legal assistance to ensure justice.

Spine Harm

Dedicated to defending persons with vertebral damage, offering dedicated legal guidance to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​