Construction Site Accident Attorney in South Roxana

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Experiencing a Construction Site Accident can be devastating, leaving deep physical and emotional scars. If you’re in South Roxana dealing with such a situation, however, help is at hand. Carlson Bier provides unmatched lawyering services for cases like yours. Our specialization? Personal injury law – with an inspired focus on construction accidents — our lawyers work relentlessly to secure fair compensation for victims of workplace mishaps and negligence-related personal injuries.

At Carlson Bier, we strive to ease your burden by offering legal expertise that’s grounded not only in years of education but also years of experience grappling with complex construction-related accident cases.

Our attorney team ferrets out pertinent details that bolster your case strength while compassionately guiding through the somewhat intimidating legal system labyrinth. We battle corporations or insurance companies’ stringent defense strategies backed by extensive knowledge about Illinois laws governing these situations—an essential weapon required during negotiations or trials.

Don’t let the fine print rob you of what you rightly deserve—pain-and-suffering damages, lost wages…and above all justice. Engage with Carlson Bier—the foremost authority when it comes to Construction Site Accidents.

About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in South Roxana Illinois

When it comes to personal injuries sustained on construction sites, Carlson Bier – your Illinois-based team of top-notch attorneys – offers an unmatched level of expertise and dedication. In the complex realm of construction site accidents, having a legal partner that is well-versed in the nuances can make all the difference. Every year, thousands of individuals find themselves facing physical, emotional, and financial hardships due to incidents occurring in these hazardous areas. Faulty equipment, careless behavior, inadequate safety measures – each poses a unique threat deserving appropriate redress.

The nature and environment of construction sites inherently predispose them to perilous situations leading to injury or loss. As adept practitioners trained in this domain, we at Carlson Bier understand the full breadth of potential hazards including:

• Falling debris: This common occurrence leads to numerous injuries every year ranging from mild concussions to severe traumas

• Equipment mishaps: Cranes tipping over, malfunctioning tools causing mishaps, dangerous handling practices – each carries its own set of risks

• Safety guideline violations: Often overlooked yet major contributors towards site accidents often resulting from inadequate training or disregard for standard procedures

Due largely to such complexities inherent within this field rendering it particularly susceptible to incidents yielding catastrophic repercussions if not addressed promptly and effectively. It is here that our firm’s commitment extends beyond mere representation; indeed we offer comprehensive guidance designed specifically around safeguarding you against any further complications that might arise as a result.

We begin with facilitating an information session where we analyse in detail every aspect related to your case such as circumstances under which incident occurred along with potentially liable parties involved plus identifying possible avenues through which monetary damages may be claimed thereby ensuring every facet gets thoroughly scrutinized before proceeding towards litigation.

Our extensive experience allows us not only comprehend intricacies present within variety of cases but also anticipate potential obstacles thereby equipping us adequately handle unforeseen developments during court proceedings thus leaving no stone unturned when advocating for our client’s rights.

However, understanding your legal recourse following a construction site accident isn’t enough. It’s vital to act promptly to ensure all evidence is properly preserved and all procedures adhered to in a timely manner. Delay or procrastination can hinder the chances of getting the justice you deserve.

Taking on insurance companies and those responsible might seem like a daunting task, but remember that you are not alone. As highly skilled personal injury attorneys operating across Illinois, we at Carlson Bier will shoulder this burden for you – meticulously building a strong case and relentlessly fighting for your rightful compensation.

With our experience navigating these complicated cases comes an understanding that every occurrence is unique. This means there isn’t one fixed level of compensation that applies when accidents happen on construction sites. Depending on various factors such as severity of injuries suffered along with the extent of financial losses incurred due to medical expenses or loss of work ability among others, amounts can greatly vary from case to case.

Remember though that filing claims for personal injury requires strategic thinking coupled with aggressive representation underpinned by thorough knowledge base specially built around proficiency related handling complex litigation matters specifically revolving around construction site incidents just like yours hence assuring best possible outcome while also helping alleviate stress often associated dealing such unfortunate occurrences oneself thereby rendering entire process relatively more bearable for affected individual parties concerned.

Hence why choosing right partner critical aspect complete recovery strategy where team Carlson Bier stands uniquely poised assist watch over intricate details so could focus rebuilding life after sustaining serious damage due negligence another party irrespective scenario confronted whether it’s slip fall caused unmarked hazard worker hurt faulty machinery object fallen above even innocent bystander injured roadside project everyone entitled safety respect human dignity therefore anyone violates fundamental principle ought held accountable without exception thus ensuring maximum restoration intended purpose law protect us all equally irrespective our role within society finger ever pointing towards victim instead always cast squarely upon perpetrator entirely deserving blame responsibility resulting harms inflicted innocently unsuspecting victims quite contrary popular opinion whereby somehow accident victim must bear some portion blame if not entirely so definitely we vehemently disagree such misguided perspectives thereby steadfastly upholding true essence law per its actual meaning.

So don’t wait any longer. Click the button below now, to find out how much your case could be worth and embark on your journey towards justice with Carlson Bier today!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For South Roxana Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in South Roxana

Areas of Practice in South Roxana

Pedal Cycle Collisions

Specializing in legal support for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' indifference or perilous conditions.

Flame Wounds

Supplying professional legal advice for people of major burn injuries caused by occurrences or misconduct.

Physician Malpractice

Offering dedicated legal representation for persons affected by healthcare malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Merchandise Obligation

Handling cases involving faulty products, extending specialist legal help to customers affected by defective items.

Geriatric Malpractice

Representing the rights of seniors who have been subjected to abuse in care facilities environments, ensuring fairness.

Stumble and Stumble Occurrences

Specialist in managing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal assistance to individuals seeking restitution for their losses.

Newborn Damages

Providing legal aid for relatives affected by medical malpractice resulting in birth injuries.

Car Incidents

Collisions: Dedicated to guiding individuals of car accidents obtain just settlement for damages and harm.

Bike Accidents

Focused on providing legal services for riders involved in scooter accidents, ensuring justice for traumas.

Big Rig Crash

Ensuring specialist legal support for victims involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing appropriate settlement for hurts.

Construction Site Accidents

Engaged in supporting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or carelessness.

Neurological Damages

Expert in providing specialized legal representation for persons suffering from cognitive injuries due to negligence.

K9 Assault Wounds

Skilled in handling cases for clients who have suffered wounds from K9 assaults or animal assaults.

Cross-walker Mishaps

Dedicated to legal services for walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering restitution.

Unwarranted Demise

Standing up for relatives affected by a wrongful death, supplying sensitive and adept legal guidance to ensure fairness.

Backbone Damage

Specializing in advocating for persons with spine impairments, offering professional legal support to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer