FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Sugar Grove

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’re a resident of Sugar Grove grappling with the aftermath of a dog bite injury, Carlson Bier may be your best option for dependable, committed legal representation. Our esteemed team comprises experienced personal injury lawyers who specialize in the field of canine attack cases. We understand how such traumatic incidents can swiftly distort one’s life and are devoted to fighting vigorously on behalf of our clients to secure optimal outcomes – whether that translates into comprehensive medical treatment coverage, compensation for psychological trauma or missed wages. With an expansive portfolio highlighting claims successfully navigated for clients throughout Illinois – including Sugar Grove – hiring Carlson Bier spells guarantee; assurance in proficiency navigating complex litigations and dedicated advocacy towards securing every possible avenue of justified reparations due from perpetrators. Remember: Your choice in pursuing rightful compensation matters significantly, so choose wisely: entrust your case with Carlson Bier today!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Sugar Grove Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we exercise our legal prowess not only in securing the rights of individuals suffering from personal injuries, but also emphasizing on matters that often go misunderstood or underestimated. Particularly poignant in this respect are cases involving dog bite injuries – an area wherein Illinois state law has explicit guidelines and consequences.

Dog bites can result in various conseqences, from mild skin abrasions to severe injuries that may involve lasting physical and psychological trauma. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), nearly 4.5 million people experience dog bites yearly in the United States; a significant number end up requiring medical intervention. Dog bites can introduce contaminants into the wound leading to infections such as rabies or tetanus if proper post-exposure prophylaxis is not done timely.

To enlighten you further regarding your legal rights as a dog bite victim, recognize that Illinois operates under a strict liability law when it comes to these incidents. This circumstance implies that even if previously devoid of violent tendencies or without known history of aggression, the dog owner is deemed responsible for bite-related harm caused by their pet. Nonetheless, there are exceptions to this principle such as incidence of provocation by the victim or risk encountered while committing an unlawful act.

Being aware hence enables rightful action following a traumatizing event like a dog bite incident:

● Seek immediate medical attention: Your health must always come first.

● Report the case: Notify both animal control authorities and local police about what happened.

● Document evidence: Record everything pertinent – identities of witnesses, pictures of injury site and setting etc.

● Hire an experienced attorney: To best outline your potential pathways toward just compensation.

At Carlson Bier Associates LLC., we’re prepared through extensive expertise gained over years handling such specialized mandates to stand unwaveringlynby your side at each step, ensuring maximum possible reimbursement for financial deficits incurred due healthcare costs related consequently lost wages or property damage besides agony endured physically and emotionally. Be it grappling with reluctant insurance companies, or dealing with difficult pet owners denying liability; our lawyers wearing their professional armor boast profound understanding of intricate details within the legal framework regarding dog bite cases in Illinois for efficacious resolution.

Lastly, we want to emphasize that you as a plaintiff hold immediate control over how your case progresses: No one else but you make decisions about whether to accept settlement offers or pursue litigation further – while we steadfastly safeguard every legal interest contextualized to your individual circumstances. We pledge to deliver personalized service marked by communication transparency fostering trust required for lasting attorney-client relationship – vital towards actualizing fair remuneration.

Understanding one’s rights under the law is often challenging; this is where Carlson Bier comes into play. Our astute lawyers constantly strive untiringly until justice has been served, bearing testament consistently throughout history of our commitment towards placing client needs first.

Ending on a more promising note – weren’t you curious earlier about knowing how much apprehended compensation can be likely obtained within parameters surrounding your dog bite predicament? Safe reassurances guarded by our unyielding commitment supporting client necessities are indeed only few quick clicks away! Wonder no more! Explore worth of your case with us because:

“Why ponder too long when valued guidance awaits below?”

So don’t hesitate any longer.Gather every ounce of courage needed for taking that first daunting step indispensable when faced with drudgery haylighted ahead post an unfortunate event like a dog bite accident. Come find out what rightful reimbursement might await by clicking on the button below now!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Sugar Grove Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Sugar Grove

Areas of Practice in Sugar Grove

Bicycle Mishaps

Specializing in legal support for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' recklessness or hazardous conditions.

Scald Injuries

Extending expert legal services for people of grave burn injuries caused by mishaps or indifference.

Clinical Carelessness

Ensuring expert legal support for patients affected by clinical malpractice, including negligent care.

Merchandise Liability

Dealing with cases involving dangerous products, supplying skilled legal services to individuals affected by product-related injuries.

Geriatric Abuse

Defending the rights of seniors who have been subjected to neglect in nursing homes environments, ensuring restitution.

Slip & Fall Incidents

Professional in handling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal advice to individuals seeking redress for their losses.

Birth Harms

Offering legal support for kin affected by medical negligence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Car Collisions

Mishaps: Devoted to supporting sufferers of car accidents gain equitable payout for wounds and destruction.

Bike Accidents

Dedicated to providing legal assistance for individuals involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring just recovery for injuries.

Semi Crash

Ensuring expert legal support for individuals involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for losses.

Building Incidents

Committed to supporting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or misconduct.

Neurological Impairments

Dedicated to extending specialized legal representation for individuals suffering from cognitive injuries due to accidents.

K9 Assault Traumas

Specialized in tackling cases for clients who have suffered traumas from puppy bites or animal attacks.

Pedestrian Incidents

Specializing in legal advocacy for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Wrongful Demise

Working for relatives affected by a wrongful death, extending empathetic and expert legal services to ensure justice.

Spinal Cord Harm

Focused on representing victims with paralysis, offering specialized legal guidance to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​