...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Summit

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering from a dog bite injury can be traumatic and intimidating, both physically and emotionally. It is important to know that you have legal rights under Illinois law. At Carlson Bier, we specialize in representing clients who have suffered from dog bite injuries. We offer comprehensive legal care designed to protect your interests while tirelessly aiming for maximum compensation on your behalf. As experienced personal injury lawyers within the Summit community, we understand local statutes related to these cases better than any others in our field.

Dog owners are responsible for controlling their pets; when they fail do so and harm results, victims deserve justice for their suffering. Our attorneys at Carlson Bier maintain an unwavering commitment towards thorough investigation of incidents leading up to each claim—this approach ensures robust representation against negligent pet owners.

Never underestimate the implications of a seemingly minor canine-inflicted wound; lingering physical discomfort or emotional distress often surface later with surprising severity.

With Carlson Bier as your committed advocate after a dog bite incident, pursuing justice becomes less complicated—trust us with dealing effectively with relevant insurers & defending your rights most assertively in court if need ever arises.

We pour our extensive knowledge into every case’s unique demands—we’re here because you certainly don’t walk alone through this daunting journey!

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Summit Illinois

At the prestigious Carlson Bier law firm, we understand that dogs are cherished members of many families, but it remains an inevitable fact that sometimes these cute pets exhibit violent behavior. Every year in Illinois, numerous individuals suffer the anguish of dog bite injuries that cause not only physical pain but also emotional trauma. We feel a sense of duty to educate our clients extensively on this subject and arm them with information that could be critical while dealing with such a stressful incident.

Dog bites can inflict serious injuries leading to infections, scars or even disfigurement. Moreover, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is another common aftermath among victims. When faced with possible outcomes like expensive medical treatments, psychological counseling and lost wages due to recovery time off work—legal recourse emerges as an indispensable tool towards justice.

• Medical Costs: The treatment for dog bites may necessitate emergency medical care, surgeries, rehabilitation therapy and prescriptions medications—all of which can result in overwhelming bills.

• Psychological Trauma: Victims report fear and anxiety after their encounter; some might require professional help for overcoming debilitating PTSD.

• Loss of Income: Most victims need time away from work for healing physically and emotionally which impacts their earnings.

In all likelihood you’re puzzling over one key question—Who should shoulder the financial burden? Here’s where Illinois law comes into play. If your injury was caused by a dog under someone else’s ownership or supervision—by law—it’s they who are held accountable. This means you have every right to demand compensation for your ordeal.

One essential piece of information regarding pursuing legal action pertains to the state-imposed statute of limitations. In Illinois, you typically have two years from the date of injury to initiate a lawsuit against a negligent owner or custodian.

Remember:

• You need not prove prior knowledge about the aggressive tendencies of the offending canine—it falls squarely under negligence at large by its handler/owner.

• Being privy about local leash laws can bolster your case—certain jurisdictions necessitate strict adherence to these regulations.

• It’s of paramount importance to document incriminating evidence like injury photos or witnesses testimonials.

At Carlson Bier, our team comprising gifted personal injury attorneys have an exceptional track record in handling highly complex dog bite cases. With us on your side, you are assured first-rate legal consultation along with committed representation throughout the litigation process. We understand it’s not just about recovering damages; it’s also about making sure such incidents are prevented from recurring thereby encouraging immediate changes in owners’ attitudes and pets’ training methods.

Another aspect that adds immense value is our promise of No Recovery, No Fee! This means we charge absolutely nothing until we win compensation for your plight—an indication of our ironclad confidence in achieving success for you.

We’re proud holders of a firm belief that citizens deserve easy access to seasoned law practitioners who will tirelessly advocate for their rights. That’s why at Carlson Bier, the fight against negligent behavior isn’t something limited within Illinois alone—in compliance with state laws excluding false advertisements; although we’re not located in Summit—we extend our top-notch services across countless cities statewide where victims reside sans any physical office therein.

By tapping into this content—hopefully—you feel informed and empowered tackling this distressing circumstance head-on. Now would be an ideal time to discover how much your traumatic experience could potentially translate into financial restitution. Our experts are keenly standing by, ready to expeditiously review your case and furnish a crystal clear evaluation at absolutely no cost!

Imagine being able to concentrate wholeheartedly on healing while we work doggedly on obtaining what legally belongs to you! Individual empowerment coupled with reliable expert assistance definitely amplifies chances at justice—the union demonstrated perfectly here at Carlson Bier.

Simply click below – let’s take the first bold step together towards holding accountable parties responsible while safeguarding against potential future negligence occurrences involving canine pals!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Summit Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Summit

Areas of Practice in Summit

Cycling Crashes

Focused on legal services for people injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' recklessness or risky conditions.

Fire Damages

Giving skilled legal advice for victims of severe burn injuries caused by accidents or recklessness.

Clinical Incompetence

Ensuring expert legal assistance for persons affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Items Fault

Taking on cases involving dangerous products, delivering skilled legal help to consumers affected by faulty goods.

Elder Neglect

Supporting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to malpractice in senior centers environments, ensuring protection.

Stumble & Trip Incidents

Professional in addressing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal services to persons seeking compensation for their suffering.

Infant Harms

Supplying legal guidance for households affected by medical incompetence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Vehicle Collisions

Collisions: Dedicated to guiding patients of car accidents obtain just remuneration for damages and destruction.

Motorbike Mishaps

Specializing in providing legal advice for victims involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for harm.

Semi Incident

Ensuring adept legal assistance for clients involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing fair recovery for losses.

Worksite Collisions

Focused on assisting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or irresponsibility.

Head Harms

Dedicated to ensuring dedicated legal assistance for persons suffering from brain injuries due to accidents.

Dog Attack Wounds

Proficient in handling cases for victims who have suffered wounds from canine attacks or wildlife encounters.

Foot-traveler Collisions

Committed to legal services for walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering compensation.

Unfair Demise

Striving for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, offering sensitive and expert legal representation to ensure restitution.

Spinal Cord Trauma

Committed to supporting patients with vertebral damage, offering specialized legal services to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer