...

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Tamms

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’ve sustained a spinal cord injury in Tamms, Illinois, navigating the legal landscape can be daunting and complex. That’s where Carlson Bier comes into play. With their unparalleled expertise in tackling personal injury cases specifically related to spinal cord injuries, they have established themselves as a notable force within the legal realm of Illinois.

It is necessary to secure representation that accurately understands your unique situation. At Carlson Bier, clients are assured of this exact understanding coupled with aggressive advocacy aimed at securing maximum compensation.

Carlson Bier takes pride in their years-long dedication exclusively focused around spinal cord injuries law practice. Their attorneys understand both medical and legal nuances associated with these types of cases which often significantly heighten chances for successful litigation.

Engaging with Carlson Bier allows access to not only their comprehensive knowledge base but also an unwavering commitment towards achieving justice and ensuring all clients’ rights are upheld diligently throughout such challenging times. So when seeking exceptional counsel regarding matters on spinal cord injury lawsuits in Tamms – contacting Carlson Bier may prove to be your best decision ever made.

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Tamms Illinois

Carlson Bier is Illinois’ leading law firm specializing in representing individuals who have suffered severe and life-altering spinal cord injuries due to the negligent or intentional actions of others. Spinal cord injuries are undoubtedly among the most traumatic, resulting in potentially devastating consequences such as paralysis, loss of bodily functions, and overwhelming medical expenses.

Various causes can result in spinal cord injuries; these range from car accidents, workplace mishaps to slips and falls. The recovery process can be prolonged and demanding both physically and financially. Therefore, it is critical to understand your rights under Illinois law if you or a loved one has suffered a spinal cord injury due to another’s negligence.

Not all damages emerging from these incidents are instantly perceptible. Some may manifest over time including:

• Permanent disability: Quadriplegia or paraplegia often results from significant trauma to the cervical (neck) or thoracic (chest level) spine.

• Sensory issues: You might experience difficulty sensing touch, temperature, pain or even identifying wherein space your body exists without looking.

• Respiratory problems: Depending upon where your injury hits on the spine; you may confront breathing-related challenges.

• Pain Management: Neuropathic pain is common following a spinal cord injury.

At Carlson Bier, we passionately represent victims of spinal cord injuries against those responsible for their suffering. We pursue justice with unrivaled determination and ensure that our clients receive deserved compensation for medical bills, lost wages, ongoing therapy costs, modifications needed at home for accessibility-dependent life quality enhancements, emotional distress plus other accident dyer impact aspects that are unique on individual cases.

Understanding what measures can be taken following an accident involving a back injury is important:

-To protect your health immediately seek professional treatment even when symptoms seem slight initially

-Document each medical encounter meticulously

-Preserve any evidence associated with incident

-Take care not incriminate yourself during interaction/s with insurance adjusters

Additionally, it is crucial to consult with a knowledgeable attorney as early on following the incident. The earlier you involve an experienced legal professional, the more effectively they can work to preserve evidence, investigate your case thoroughly and ultimately secure the compensation that you rightfully deserve.

In Illinois, we recognize that proving someone else’s negligence resulted in your bodily harm stands as one of the most significant challenges victims face when fighting for justice. Carlson Bier law firm boasts a track record of success grounded in dedication to our clients’ best interests, deep comprehension of spinal injury complexities and familiarity with applicable laws across Illinois jurisdictions.

Moreover, our attorneys go above and beyond in client support ensuring claimants be informed every case phase starting from detailed initial consultation where we take time understanding all aspects hence create personalized strategies designed solely for achieving maximal results then continuous updates about any progress so everyone can stay confident throughout while focusing fully on their recovery.

To obtain comprehensive legal support or learn more about pursuing rightful compensation after suffering a debilitating spinal cord injury, put no trust elsewhere than Carlson Bier; Our commitment is delivering exceptional representation both in negotiations with insurance providers and trial cases if necessary- rest assured knowing never compromise when it comes down fighting tooth nail just ensure successful outcome client deserves.

Facing the aftermath of spinal cord injures courageously entails partnering up with professionals who will genuinely fight for your rights under their custody. How much worth would your claim hold? Imagine acquiring unconditional assistance for an obligation-free assessment of potential claims by clicking on the button below. Empower yourself today! Let us at Carlson Bier protect while rebuilding towards brighter tomorrow confidently – though past sorrow won’t be erased full measure nonetheless secured future without financial constraints looming over head start anew steps away… Time courageously reclaim Life!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Tamms Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Tamms

Areas of Practice in Tamms

Bicycle Mishaps

Expert in legal assistance for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' carelessness or risky conditions.

Fire Injuries

Providing adept legal assistance for victims of intense burn injuries caused by accidents or negligence.

Healthcare Carelessness

Delivering professional legal services for patients affected by physician malpractice, including surgical errors.

Products Obligation

Managing cases involving faulty products, providing specialist legal help to consumers affected by harmful products.

Elder Abuse

Representing the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to mistreatment in care facilities environments, ensuring protection.

Fall and Trip Injuries

Skilled in addressing trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to victims seeking restitution for their injuries.

Newborn Wounds

Supplying legal support for relatives affected by medical carelessness resulting in newborn injuries.

Auto Mishaps

Collisions: Concentrated on aiding patients of car accidents receive fair recompense for injuries and impairment.

Bike Mishaps

Expert in providing legal assistance for individuals involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for injuries.

Semi Collision

Offering professional legal support for individuals involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing fair recovery for damages.

Construction Mishaps

Engaged in supporting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or carelessness.

Brain Impairments

Specializing in providing professional legal support for patients suffering from brain injuries due to negligence.

K9 Assault Wounds

Proficient in handling cases for persons who have suffered damages from K9 assaults or animal assaults.

Jogger Incidents

Committed to legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering restitution.

Unjust Demise

Fighting for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, delivering understanding and experienced legal representation to ensure redress.

Spinal Cord Harm

Committed to supporting persons with spinal cord injuries, offering specialized legal assistance to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer