...

Slip And Fall Accidents Attorney in Tonica

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When seeking trusted and reliable representation for your Slip And Fall Accident case, Carlson Bier is the epitome of excellence. As a highly revered personal injury lawyer firm in Illinois, our dedicated focus on Slip And Fall Accidents sets us apart from others. Navigating this complex field demands more than surface knowledge, it requires our level of expertise honed over years by tangibly aiding countless clients through similar predicaments. At times when overriding anxiety could compromise rational decision-making due to an unfortunate accident around Tonica area, having Carlson Bier as your legal advocate ensures objectivity coupled with assertiveness to get you the justice you deserve. We strive relentlessly toward unveiling hidden facets of each claim that strengthens your case extensively resulting in favorable rulings. Choosing Carlson Bier symbolizes choosing unyielding commitment towards achieving rightful remunerations assuring peace amidst tumultuous circumstances involving slip and fall accidents. Lean on us; at Carlson Bier we stand as not just counselors but unwavering pillars resolute to affirm value for every unsettling experience encountered.

About Carlson Bier

Slip And Fall Accidents Lawyers in Tonica Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we’re a team of dedicated personal injury attorneys specializing in the subtleties and nuances of Illinois law. Our primary focus lies within the realm of Slip and Fall Accidents – a common but often misunderstood area within our field. To clear up any confusion for all our esteemed clients, here’s a detailed review with easily understood tips on handling these unfortunate incidents.

Slip and fall accidents can happen anytime, anywhere; it could occur while grocery shopping, at work or just walking down the street. As innocuous as they may seem initially, the after-effects can be gravely injurious physically and financially. But what precisely constitutes such an accident? A slip and fall incident typically occurs when an individual stumbles due to neglectful conditions like inadequate lighting, wet floors without warning signs or uneven surfaces left unattended by property owners.

• Hazardous Environment: Allow us to stress that hazardous environments across properties play a significant role in facilitating such episodes.

• Awareness of Conditions: Awareness (or the lack thereof) regarding poor maintenance standards is usually an integral part of your potential claim.

• Failure to Rectify Hazards: Moreover, if property owners are cognizant about existing hazards but failed to rectify them promptly could significantly boost your legal stance.

According to Illinois laws regarding landowner liability oftentimes murky zone clarity becomes mandatory before moving forward legally. It’s crucial to understand where you stand – are you an invitee who was welcomed onto someone else’s private property? Or perhaps you were a licensee having implicit approval to be there like a door-to-door salesperson. This classification plays an integral part during case deliberations since inviting parties owe higher safety obligations than compared with mere licensees.

For claims involving public properties, different rules often apply making these cases inevitably more complex pointing towards possible governmental immunity from lawsuits this isn’t always absolute though so understanding exceptions will be essential which our skilled lawyers will skillfully do guiding you through each step.

• Government Property Exceptions: Keep in mind that exceptions to governmental immunity transpire if negligent maintenance poses a known danger.

• Non-Government Properties: Conversely, on non-government properties, your status – invitee or licensee – could significantly affect the case outcome.

Aside from these major points, there are several factors unique to every situation which only an experienced personal injury attorney can analyse and recognize. Our meticulous team at Carlson Bier is committed to understanding your narrative aptly while meticulously navigating the varying legal terrains for substantial results.

Evidence gathering is another crucial aspect; photographs of harmful conditions or medical reports indicating resultant injuries will potentially act as robust pillars supporting your narrative during this process we prioritize helping gather the needful information with utmost accuracy ensuring smooth proceedings.

Compensation after such grievous accidents usually covers various areas like medical costs, lost wages due to inability work along with emotional suffering our dedicated professionals endeavour tirelessly so justice served accurately never losing sight of your unique needs throughout fight knowing well what’s at stake for victims like you.

Finally, understanding how difficult it must be going through such trials we want offer our unwavering support during this challenging journey inviting all prospective clients click below find out much their case might worth offering guidance backed by years hands-on experience rest assured that our priority lies within establishing trust working together towards favorable outcomes collectively let’s set motion steps towards potential success against perpetuators negligent hazards put safety and wellbeing first choose us Carlson Bier stand allies in battle protect rights achieve rightful compensation.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Tonica Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Slip & Fall Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of slip and fall accidents in Chicago include:

  • Wet or slippery floors: This could include spills, leaks, and snow and ice.
  • Uneven surfaces: This could include potholes, cracks in the pavement, and loose floorboards.
  • Poor lighting: This could make it difficult to see hazards on the ground.
  • Obstructions: This could include cords, boxes, and other objects that are in the way.

If you have a slip and fall accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to the property owner or manager. This will create a record of the accident and help you build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Contact a slip and fall accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a slip and fall accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the property owner or manager if you believe they were negligent in maintaining the property.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a slip and fall accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.

Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for slip and fall accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Tonica

Areas of Practice in Tonica

Bike Accidents

Specializing in legal representation for people injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' negligence or perilous conditions.

Thermal Wounds

Supplying expert legal support for patients of severe burn injuries caused by incidents or misconduct.

Clinical Carelessness

Delivering experienced legal support for clients affected by physician malpractice, including surgical errors.

Commodities Fault

Taking on cases involving dangerous products, offering expert legal support to individuals affected by defective items.

Elder Mistreatment

Protecting the rights of elders who have been subjected to malpractice in aged care environments, ensuring justice.

Trip & Trip Incidents

Professional in dealing with trip accident cases, providing legal support to sufferers seeking restitution for their harm.

Infant Wounds

Delivering legal assistance for loved ones affected by medical negligence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Auto Collisions

Incidents: Devoted to helping victims of car accidents secure appropriate payout for wounds and losses.

Motorbike Collisions

Committed to providing legal services for motorcyclists involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for damages.

Semi Mishap

Extending professional legal assistance for persons involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing appropriate compensation for damages.

Building Mishaps

Dedicated to representing workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or negligence.

Brain Traumas

Committed to ensuring expert legal support for clients suffering from head injuries due to accidents.

Canine Attack Traumas

Proficient in addressing cases for individuals who have suffered injuries from dog attacks or animal attacks.

Jogger Crashes

Focused on legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering recovery.

Wrongful Death

Advocating for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, supplying understanding and experienced legal assistance to ensure fairness.

Backbone Injury

Specializing in advocating for persons with vertebral damage, offering compassionate legal services to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer