...

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Vienna

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When spinal cord injuries occur, the consequences are often life-altering. Support and guidance from renowned experts, such as Carlson Bier law firm, become critical aids to navigate through the complex legal procedures. With a deep understanding of spinal cord injury cases in Illinois, we are keenly aware of your needs and will vigilantly pursue the compensation you deserve for your pain, suffering, medical expenses and lost wages.

Our team at Carlson Bier are seasoned advocates in this area of law; leveraging their experience and knowledge gained through many successful battles fought on behalf of clients like you. We have cultivated an approach that is tailored to each client’s unique circumstances while maintaining our steadfast focus on securing fair reparations for them.

Given our extensive understanding of Illinois laws governing personal injuries – including those specific to spinal damage – we can effectively handle even the multi-faceted aspects inherent with such cases.

At Carlson Bier, we stand by your side throughout this challenging journey towards recovery; committed not just to deliver expert legal services but also ensuring that it feels less daunting for you during these trying times.

Trust Carlson Bier law firm — known for its integrity across Vienna — with pursuing justice by leveraging expertise pivotal in salvaging hope amidst painful realities caused by spinal cord injuries.

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Vienna Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the overwhelming nature and far-reaching consequences of sustaining a spinal cord injury (SCI). As an experienced Illinois-based law firm, our dedicated team of personal injury attorneys excel in navigating the complexities surrounding these types of injuries. Not only do we bring a potent combination of compassion and expertise to your case, but we also ensure that all your concerns are addressed while relieving you from dealing with complicated legal procedures.

Spinal Cord Injuries can range from mildly distressing to completely life-altering. These typically occur due to an abrupt blow or damage to the spine. The preliminary symptoms vary markedly based on the severity and location of the injury within spinal regions:

• Upper Neck Injuries often lead to full paralysis or quadriplegia.

• Injuries in Neck below C4 primarily affect bodily functions like breathing.

• Thoracic Spine Injuries result frequently in paraplegia and impaired balance control.

Our clients’ most common experience involves motor vehicle accidents, sporting incidents, falls, construction site accidents, and physical assaults resulting in SCI; however, every situation is unique. At Carlson Bier, each case is evaluated meticulously to ascertain liability accurately before pursuing crucial compensation.

The immediate impact of Spinal Cord Injuries can be devastating for individuals catapulted into a harsh new reality they didn’t anticipate. Society’s understanding certainly extends to the initial traumatic incident – there is shared empathy for instances changeable at best; debilitating at worst – yet awareness seems restricted regarding enduring daily difficulties post-injury:

• Modified mobility levels necessitating wheelchair use

• Reconfigured housing & transportation requirements

• Extensive need for professional care assistance

• Potential unemployment due to disability implications

Navigating this tough terrain requires broader recognition – not just sympathies.

Proper representation positively impacts both compensation amounts and overall client peace-of-mind throughout proceedings.rlstudies show claimants who engage skilled legal advocacy deliver notably higher settlement results compared to those enduring this alone. Carlson Bier attorneys are ready to equip you with the leverage needed when confronting insurers, allowing compelling case narratives highlighting your specific needs post-injury.

We bring unmatched determination fueled by our desire for justice on behalf of all victims of negligence. We take the time to fully understanding your condition, pain levels and future projections factored into all compensation demands. This comprehensive approach ensures we define a personalized strategy built on transparency and thoroughness.

Whilst money can never make up for the debilitating losses suffered when SPls occur, financial compensation plays a significant role in providing victims access to uncompromising healthcare, ensuring living standards are maintained whilst delivering a means-towards closure found in some semblance of justice served.

If you or someone close has recently endured Spinal Cord Injury following an accident not their fault, we encourage you to reach out now. With Carlson Bier at your side, expect legal guidance that illuminates rather than confuses; professional services dispelling any fear surrounding claim processes – safeguarding your interests procedurally whilst giving due consideration towards psychological implications prevalent in SCI instances.

Click on the button below to receive an estimate of what your case could be worth. Don’t face such adversity unassisted – let us advocate strongly on your behalf as we stand alongside each step towards betterment beginnings. Carlson Bier commits its resources toward reaching agreement terms most appropriate for recuperative continuity within injury survivors’ lives: Your resilience deserves recognition — gain deserved recompense through established expertise where it matters most ALL under Illinois law alignments faithfully guarded throughout.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Vienna Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Vienna

Areas of Practice in Vienna

Pedal Cycle Mishaps

Dedicated to legal support for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' carelessness or hazardous conditions.

Burn Damages

Supplying specialist legal assistance for people of grave burn injuries caused by accidents or recklessness.

Physician Negligence

Ensuring professional legal support for victims affected by clinical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Commodities Accountability

Taking on cases involving dangerous products, extending specialist legal services to individuals affected by product malfunctions.

Geriatric Neglect

Protecting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to mistreatment in senior centers environments, ensuring restitution.

Slip and Trip Mishaps

Professional in dealing with stumble accident cases, providing legal services to clients seeking justice for their injuries.

Neonatal Wounds

Providing legal guidance for families affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Car Accidents

Crashes: Dedicated to supporting individuals of car accidents receive fair recompense for harms and destruction.

Scooter Accidents

Committed to providing legal advice for victims involved in scooter accidents, ensuring justice for losses.

18-Wheeler Accident

Providing specialist legal representation for clients involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing rightful compensation for harms.

Building Site Collisions

Concentrated on representing laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or irresponsibility.

Cerebral Impairments

Committed to delivering professional legal services for victims suffering from brain injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Damages

Expertise in dealing with cases for persons who have suffered traumas from K9 assaults or beast attacks.

Cross-walker Accidents

Dedicated to legal services for walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering claims.

Unwarranted Fatality

Striving for relatives affected by a wrongful death, providing sensitive and experienced legal representation to ensure justice.

Spinal Cord Damage

Specializing in supporting individuals with spinal cord injuries, offering specialized legal assistance to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer