FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Wayne City

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Experiencing a dog bite can be both physically painful and emotionally distressing. When such an incident occurs, it’s crucial to have Carlson Bier on your side – experts in handling Dog Bite Injury case in Wayne City. We’re distinguished as a preeminent law firm specializing in personal injury cases extensively including Dog Bite Injuries. Our tenacious team of attorneys works diligently afford you the justice that you deserve.

At Carlson Bier, our primary focus is protecting your rights under Illinois Law, ensuring all legal processes are meticulously followed. Alongside breakout cases which we handle on behalf of Wayne City residents injured by dog bites; hence demonstrating our unique comprehension of the singular statutes tied extensively to these disputes within this jurisdiction.

Our accomplished history coupled with remarkable success rates makes us not just another law firm but a valuable advocate for those affected by dog bites injuries. Personalized attention is assured from your first contact with us until justice prevails.

Choose wisely, choose Carlson Bier—the expert handler of Dog Bite Injury cases at every dimensional angle across Illinois embracing Wayne City—holding claimants’ interests at heart.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Wayne City Illinois

Understanding the complexities that exist in cases involving dog bite injuries requires the adept legal expertise of a team like Carlson Bier. With our wealth of knowledge and proficiency, we aim to provide insight for potential clients dealing with this tragically common problem in Illinois.

Dog bites can precipitate serious physical harm and psychological trauma. The severity and aftermath of these incidents often go unnoticed until it affects someone personally. Scarring, disfigurement, nerve damage, risk of infections such as rabies and tetanus are just a handful of direct health implications resulting from dog bite injuries. Furthermore, victims may also suffer emotionally; developing fears or phobias that persist long after the physical wounds have healed.

Responsibility for these injuries typically falls upon the pet’s owner, who under most circumstances are legally liable for damages caused by their pets under Illinois law. It is noteworthy to mention that Illinois imposes ‘strict liability’ on dog owners. This means you do not need to prove negligence or fault against dog owners to be compensated for your medical bills and other losses. All you need to demonstrate is that you were bit while lawfully on private property or in a public place and did NOT provoke the animal.

• Compensation structure includes:

– Medical Expenses: These encompass treatment costs ranging from emergency room visits to surgical procedures if necessary.

– Lost Wages: If you’re unable to work post-incident because of recovery time or due to frequent doctor’s appointments.

– Pain & Suffering: These entitlements account for physical pain along with emotional distress endured as a direct result of the attack.

However, achieving fair compensation involves navigating complex litigation processes coupled with unswerving negotiation skills—a challenge best undertaken with adequate legal representation.

Why Choose Carlson Bier? We understand how traumatic an incident like a dog bite can be. Our firm has extensive experience handling personal injury claims with empathetic care yet aggressive representation needed to win full compensation. Our attorneys provide a comprehensive approach, investigating every dimension of your claim to secure maximum compensation possible.

Navigating the legal process alone can be daunting but with Carlson Bier by your side, you’ll never feel isolated or overwhelmed. From filing claims on your behalf to uncompromisingly advocating for your rights in court, our team will guide you every step of the way ensuring constant communication and unparalleled support.

At Carlson Bier, we recognize that each case is unique and being treated as such makes all the difference when aiming for successful outcomes. Our Chicago-based firm specializes in personal injury cases (like dog bite injuries) and stands ready to put this expertise to work for you.

Are you ready to get started? The next step towards achieving just compensation begins here! Act promptly; Illinois law allows only a limited amount of time after the accident occurred (typically two years), known as the ‘statute of limitations,’ within which you can file a lawsuit. Avoid costly mistakes by letting us handle your case professionally while abiding by state rules and regulations concerning these matters.

Don’t let financial dread impede your pursuit of justice; At Carlson Bier, we adhere strictly to a contingency fee basis—meaning that unless we win or settle your case favorably, you don’t owe us any legal fees!

Now comes the moment of truth: How much could your case be worth? It’s time to find out! Click on the button below & let’s start recording what might be an important victory for you in overcoming this tragic ordeal—all on terms favorable to YOU! Remember, at Carlson Bier—it isn’t just about winning; it’s about ensuring YOUR wellbeing becomes OUR priority.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Wayne City Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Wayne City

Areas of Practice in Wayne City

Bike Crashes

Dedicated to legal assistance for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' lack of care or perilous conditions.

Thermal Injuries

Extending expert legal services for people of major burn injuries caused by occurrences or carelessness.

Medical Malpractice

Delivering experienced legal representation for clients affected by hospital malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Commodities Accountability

Addressing cases involving problematic products, offering adept legal support to clients affected by defective items.

Senior Malpractice

Representing the rights of seniors who have been subjected to mistreatment in aged care environments, ensuring justice.

Trip & Trip Injuries

Professional in dealing with fall and trip accident cases, providing legal advice to victims seeking restitution for their damages.

Infant Injuries

Offering legal help for relatives affected by medical malpractice resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Incidents

Crashes: Devoted to assisting victims of car accidents gain equitable compensation for injuries and losses.

Scooter Crashes

Committed to providing legal services for victims involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring justice for damages.

Semi Crash

Extending expert legal advice for victims involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recompense for losses.

Construction Accidents

Engaged in assisting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or irresponsibility.

Cognitive Traumas

Expert in providing compassionate legal support for individuals suffering from cerebral injuries due to incidents.

Canine Attack Injuries

Skilled in addressing cases for persons who have suffered harms from dog bites or beast attacks.

Cross-walker Collisions

Focused on legal services for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering damages.

Unwarranted Death

Working for families affected by a wrongful death, providing compassionate and expert legal representation to ensure redress.

Vertebral Injury

Committed to assisting individuals with spinal cord injuries, offering dedicated legal representation to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​