...

Construction Site Accident Attorney in West Town

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Faced with a Construction Site Accident in West Town? Carlson Bier, your dedicated legal ally is here to represent your best interests. Renowned for expertise and relentless pursuit of justice, our exceptional team handles every case with strategic precision and compassion. We understand the intricacies involved in construction site mishaps – the complexities that render them beyond ordinary personal injury cases. At Carlson Bier, we’re not simply lawyers; we are seasoned advocates committed to protecting your rights through comprehensive investigation and aggressive representation. Our premier Illinois-based law firm offers attentive consultations ensuring clarity at each step of the complex litigation journey. Drawing upon years of experience litigating Construction Site Accidents statewide, trust us to secure maximum compensation while reducing hassle during these tough times for clients from West Town or any part of Illinois State. When looking out for an experienced attorney who can handle your accident claim smoothly under Illinois laws – it’s about choosing wisely because you have one chance to win what’s rightly yours- Choose Carlson Bier.

About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in West Town Illinois

At the esteemed law firm of Carlson Bier, we are a dedicated team of personal injury attorneys committed to representing victims of construction site accidents in Illinois. Accidents and injuries at construction sites can be devastating, leading to costly medical expenses, lost wages, and in severe cases, disability or death. Our renowned expertise in this complex area of law is unparalleled.

Firstly, it is important to understand what constitutes a construction site accident. These incidents commonly involve slip and falls due to wet surfaces or unsecured materials; mishaps linked with heavy machinery such as cranes or bulldozers; accidents involving scaffolding collapses; electrocutions from power lines; explosions or fires resulting from improperly stored hazardous materials, among others.

• Slip or trip hazards on-site

• Machinery malfunctioning

• Scaffold collapse

• Electrocutions

• Hazardous material mismanagement

Every construction worker has the right to work in an environment that adheres strictly to safety standards set out by OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration). If these standards are not rigorously maintained leading to ensuing harms like physical injuries and emotional distresses – our top-notch legal team swoops into action.

Navigating the complexity of a constructions claim entails understanding causations for negligence: subpar safety regulations posing risks to personnel; faulty equipment usage contributing towards wrongful deaths along with contractor liability pegged against either general contractors having total control over whole projects whereas subcontractors focused only on particular tasks. The buck doesn’t stop here – premise liabilities too come under purview for failing stringent inspections alongside other violations.

If you have been a victim of a construction site accident anywhere within Illinois—know that you’re not alone—in fact far from it! It’s your undeniable right seeking compensation for incurred damages comprising not just humongous medical bills but also potential losses for future earnings coupled with less quantifiable pain-sufferance indexes.

Compiling proofs ascends utmost importance towards pursuing successful claims. Documented medical records, eye-witness testimonies, photographic evidence of the accident scene – no stone left unturned thereby building up a solid case substantiating your claim to compensation. Undoubtedly, this might seem overwhelming; we recommend enlisting an experienced personal injury attorney.

This is where Carlson Bier steps in: We are steadfastly dedicated towards preserving your rights while not only facilitating you across legal turbulence but also assisting in accessing rightful compensations. Our driven attorneys investigate comprehensively to decipher fault lines and determine accountability—unyielding commitment that translates into impressive success rates!

Time matters. Personal injury claims do carry statues of limitations within Illinois and therefore filing lawsuits promptly post-accidents becomes quintessential towards achieving desired outcomes. If you were unfortunately embroiled within construction site accidents, don’t wait longer – immediate consultations pave ways forward bolstering your course for rightful retribution.

At Carlson Bier, we understand the enormity thrown by tragic construction site accidents: Lives permanently altered leaving families grappling with uncalled hardships apart from sudden financial instability; yet victims retaining legal rights equipped to negotiate fair compensatory sums against sustained losses.

In summing-up, Carlson Bier urges taking the first step towards justice – click on the button below allowing us steer through legal complexities assessing comprehensive details about potential case-worthiness—as against general information concerning probabilities surrounding usual settlements along with generic verdicts because each case retains its unique footprint hence no one-size-fits-all pattern using ball-park figures leading nowhere concrete rather than providing a meaningful comparative context pivoted around specific situations showcasing real-world implications accurately assessed by extensively experienced Carlson Bier attorneys known for their remarkable record concerning victorious litigations indeed making a difference when it matters most!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For West Town Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in West Town

Areas of Practice in West Town

Bike Accidents

Focused on legal assistance for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' recklessness or unsafe conditions.

Fire Traumas

Providing expert legal help for victims of intense burn injuries caused by events or carelessness.

Healthcare Carelessness

Ensuring professional legal support for victims affected by hospital malpractice, including surgical errors.

Merchandise Liability

Managing cases involving unsafe products, delivering skilled legal help to customers affected by product-related injuries.

Geriatric Misconduct

Defending the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to neglect in care facilities environments, ensuring protection.

Slip & Trip Injuries

Adept in tackling tumble accident cases, providing legal advice to victims seeking restitution for their suffering.

Infant Injuries

Delivering legal support for families affected by medical misconduct resulting in neonatal injuries.

Auto Accidents

Mishaps: Focused on guiding victims of car accidents get appropriate payout for harms and harm.

Motorcycle Crashes

Dedicated to providing legal advice for bikers involved in bike accidents, ensuring just recovery for injuries.

18-Wheeler Collision

Ensuring adept legal assistance for persons involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing rightful claims for injuries.

Construction Incidents

Engaged in supporting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or carelessness.

Head Injuries

Specializing in extending compassionate legal support for victims suffering from head injuries due to misconduct.

Canine Attack Damages

Expertise in handling cases for clients who have suffered injuries from K9 assaults or beast attacks.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Committed to legal advocacy for joggers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering compensation.

Unfair Loss

Striving for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, extending compassionate and expert legal representation to ensure restitution.

Spinal Cord Impairment

Dedicated to advocating for persons with spine impairments, offering professional legal support to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer