...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Carlinville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’ve suffered a spinal cord injury in Carlinville and need dedicated legal representation to secure the justice and compensation you deserve, look no further than Carlson Bier. As seasoned personal injury attorneys, we specialize in cases involving spinal cord injuries, adeptly navigating these difficult circumstances with skillful expertise unique to our firm. We understand how an accident transforming your life can leave not only physical pain but emotional trauma too; hence we approach each client’s needs with utmost sensitivity coupled with sterling professionalism.

At Carlson Bier, we have championed countless clients’ rights securing fair settlements that cover medical bills, livelihood replacements among other financial burdens post-injury. Our extensive knowledge base equips us for fighting relentlessly against insurance companies who often aim at underpaying victims.

Making us your steadfast partners guarantees meticulous attention applied to every detail of evidence gathering process ensuring strong case building and formidable representation in court if necessary.

Having conducted substantial business successfully serving clients across Illinois including Carlinville region has given us sharp understanding to navigate local legislation effectively. Trust your case into our hands and experience what sets Carlson Bier apart as dependable advocates during trying times caused by regrettable Spinal Cord Injuries. Remember suffering is temporary – fairness shouldn’t be!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Carlinville Illinois

At Carlson Bier, Illinois’ leading personal injury attorney group, we specialize in providing exceptional legal services and support for victims of spinal cord injuries. Our experience affords us a comprehensive understanding of the complexities that come with such delicate cases.

Spinal Cord Injuries (SCIs) are among the most severe forms of physical harm a person can endure. The potential impact on your life is enormous as they often result in partial or complete paralysis which could significantly alter your lifestyle. The strains it places on you financially and emotionally are immeasurable – from loss of income to long-term medical care needs. At Carlson Bier, our aim is to address these concerns by providing diligent legal assistance.

To ensure that all our clients are fully informed about Spinal Cord Injuries, we’ve compiled key details:

• Etiology: SCIs occur mainly due to a sudden blow or cut to the spine. Common causes include vehicular accidents and catastrophic falls.

• Aftermath: Following an SCI, not only do you have to grapple with permanent implications like difficulty walking or even total immobility, but also face high costs associated with diagnosis, initial treatment, rehabilitation and long-term care.

• Legal Rights: If your SCI was caused by negligence e.g., if someone’s reckless driving led to your accident, or an employer did not take essential safety precautions at your workplace–you may be entitled to compensation.

Our experienced team at Carlson Bier goes above and beyond in every case because we understand just how much is at stake for you – both now and in years to come. We offer holistic representation that encompasses counseling support alongside aggressive litigation strategies aimed at securing maximum compensation for brain trauma patients who’ve been subjected to unfair hardship due to another’s negligence.

What sets Carlson Bier apart is our commitment; we tirelessly advocate for justice because everybody deserves access to quality healthcare without facing financial ruin after traumatic incidents like SCIs. We pride ourselves on maintaining a client-centered approach; thus, we provide personalized services tailored to address each individual’s unique context and circumstances.

Additionally, Carlson Bier stands firm with our no win – no fee policy. Rest assured of our commitment to your cause- we only get paid when you receive the compensation you deserve. We stand by your side every step of the way from crafting a compelling case to assertively representing your interests in trial or settlement negotiations.

At Carlson Bier, it’s not just about winning cases—it’s about making sure victims regain their life as smoothly as possible after such shocking incidents. Let us assume the legal burden so that you can focus solely on recovery and continued wellness.

Bear in mind that in Illinois law, deadlines may apply to personal injury claims —dubbed “Statute of Limitations.” Therefore, taking proactive steps sooner rather than later is vital as delayed action could impact the outcome of your case negatively.

To make informed decisions regarding your situation, schedule a free consultation with one of our competent attorneys today at Carlson Bier. Click on the button below to find out how much your Spinal Cord Injury case might be worth—you have nothing to lose but potentially a lot to gain.

Remember: You don’t necessarily need to face these challenges alone – support is available from an experienced team who understands what you’re going through and has dedicated their professional lives towards providing advocacy for those affected by spinal cord injuries. Choose Carlson Bier because we base our success on improving clients’ lives significantly amidst challenging situations: Your victory is absolutely ours too!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Carlinville Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Carlinville

Areas of Practice in Carlinville

Pedal Cycle Accidents

Specializing in legal assistance for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' recklessness or hazardous conditions.

Burn Damages

Extending skilled legal assistance for sufferers of serious burn injuries caused by mishaps or recklessness.

Clinical Incompetence

Providing dedicated legal support for victims affected by hospital malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Commodities Fault

Dealing with cases involving faulty products, providing specialist legal support to customers affected by faulty goods.

Nursing Home Malpractice

Defending the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to misconduct in aged care environments, ensuring restitution.

Trip & Trip Occurrences

Skilled in tackling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal representation to victims seeking justice for their harm.

Neonatal Damages

Offering legal assistance for kin affected by medical misconduct resulting in newborn injuries.

Motor Collisions

Crashes: Committed to aiding patients of car accidents secure just remuneration for damages and impairment.

Motorcycle Accidents

Focused on providing legal advice for victims involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for traumas.

Trucking Mishap

Offering adept legal services for drivers involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing appropriate compensation for hurts.

Construction Mishaps

Committed to defending workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or carelessness.

Head Harms

Dedicated to ensuring specialized legal support for individuals suffering from cognitive injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Wounds

Adept at managing cases for victims who have suffered wounds from K9 assaults or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Crashes

Expert in legal services for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering restitution.

Unjust Fatality

Striving for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, offering empathetic and adept legal support to ensure redress.

Vertebral Impairment

Expert in advocating for clients with backbone trauma, offering specialized legal guidance to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​