...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Personal Injury Attorney in Dupo

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Injured in Dupo and seeking an exceptional Personal Injury Lawyer? Consider Carlson Bier – a highly reputed law firm renowned for its rigorous dedication to personal injury clients. Our proven track record of success is a testament to our comprehensive approach, extensive legal expertise, and deeper understanding of Illinois statutes that govern personal injury cases. At Carlson Bier, we view each case as unique; hence we develop strategic courses with your best interest at heart. From vehicular accidents to workplace mishaps, premises liability or medical malpractice claims – our broad range of skills ensure you secure the compensation you rightfully deserve. With round-the-clock service accessibility, rest assured that we are committed throughout every step towards justice recovery on your behalf! Prompt action can make all the difference when dealing with personal injuries; take advantage today by securing professional legal representation from none but Carlson Bier– undoubtedly among top-tier firms serving those requiring a Personal Injury lawyer near Dupo area.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Personal Injury Lawyers in Dupo Illinois

In the state of Illinois, understanding personal injury law can be a complex yet vital factor in seeking justice for you or your loved ones. Here at Carlson Bier, we lead with the weight of distinction and experience that has established us as a notable legal entity within the realm of personal injury litigation. Our expertise is grounded tightly in our full comprehension of this distinct facet including the nuances and intricacies that bear potential impact on any given case.

Personal injuries vary widely – they may manifest in forms like vehicle accidents to slips and falls, medical malpractice to wrongful deaths. All these situations are disheartening incidences where victims endure not just physical suffering but also emotional distress and financial burden.

• We comprehend roping complexities ensnaring tort laws.

• We provide aggressive representation tailored uniquely to each client’s needs.

• We command our often unchallenged know-how to target maximum compensation due.

Our bedrock belief resides in aiding those unfairly afflicted by life-altering accidents or negligence; providing them with the opportunity for rightful restitution – anchoring it both morally and legally-earned right rather than mere privilege. With every case represented, our mission is steeped in affording clients the best possible outcome – engaging our utmost professional commitment garnished with unwavering compassion and tactical strategy.

Knowledge truly fuels empowerment – one must understand particular rights under Personal Injury Law enabling confident legal pursuits disciplining responsible parties. Key elements umbilically connecting an incidence to a valid personal injury lawsuit:

• Duty: The ‘accused’ held some form of duty towards the victim;

• Breach: There was a breach of said duty;

• Cause: This breach directly caused harm;

• Harm: Tangible proof reveals definitive harm (physical or psychological).

Crucially, Illinois operates under Modified Comparative Negligence Rule allowing victims some fault preserving their right still claiming damages. If fault is determined less than 50%, one retains damage claim entitlement proportionate to their fault percentage. Beyond 50%, a victim loses this right of claim.

Personal injury cases often tiptoe on tight timelines, coordinated with Illinois Statutes of Limitation. According to this legislation, one should file a personal injury lawsuit within two years post-accident (or discovery of injuries). Skewing beyond the prescribed timeframe could curb chances for just compensation significantly.

At Carlson Bier, we house an accomplished team of lawyers committed relentlessly uncovering your rightful compensation ensuring you aren’t stranded helplessly bearing financial burdens bred by physical pain or emotional trauma. Our belief firmly holds that your present suffering should not dictate your future – our tenacious advocacy fights assertively towards anchoring justice in its place.

Navigating tortuous roads through Personal Injury Law corridors can seem overwhelmingly daunting task yet with the right legal companion it transforms from insurmountable hurdle into navigatable passageway heading resolutely toward restitution and healing. It is always imperative steering clear from assumption traps and pursuing expertly-guided action plans instead – abiding by a well-established truth: every case carries its unique pulse filtering various layers ebbing strategy success.

We invite you now — take advantage Thompson Carlson Bier representation. Upheld by adept professional proficiency paired unyielding dedication – let us lift the cumbersome legality weight off your shoulders fostering hope kindling stability amidst life’s tumultuous upheavals endured post-injury. We stand as beacon holding high trust–experienced Professional Injury Lawyers navigating strenuous tides standing up for what’s rightfully yours reclaiming peace where turmoil once lurked deep-stranding.

Make arguably most essential move today simply clicking the button below. Empower yourself setting service motions secure knowledge in hand defining potential worth your case enduring rightful compensatory dues deserved stroke empowering finality justice across unsettled distresses lingering unresolved consequences accident untoward incident endured.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Dupo Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Dupo

Areas of Practice in Dupo

Cycling Crashes

Specializing in legal services for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others' negligence or risky conditions.

Burn Burns

Offering adept legal services for victims of serious burn injuries caused by accidents or recklessness.

Physician Misconduct

Delivering expert legal services for patients affected by medical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Commodities Liability

Managing cases involving dangerous products, extending skilled legal help to consumers affected by product-related injuries.

Elder Mistreatment

Defending the rights of seniors who have been subjected to malpractice in senior centers environments, ensuring compensation.

Slip & Slip Mishaps

Expert in managing trip accident cases, providing legal services to victims seeking restitution for their suffering.

Childbirth Harms

Supplying legal guidance for households affected by medical malpractice resulting in birth injuries.

Car Collisions

Mishaps: Dedicated to supporting sufferers of car accidents obtain equitable compensation for harms and losses.

Bike Accidents

Focused on providing legal advice for victims involved in scooter accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for traumas.

Trucking Incident

Providing specialist legal representation for clients involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing fair recovery for losses.

Building Collisions

Focused on assisting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or carelessness.

Brain Impairments

Committed to extending specialized legal advice for victims suffering from head injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Harms

Skilled in addressing cases for victims who have suffered injuries from K9 assaults or animal attacks.

Foot-traveler Crashes

Expert in legal representation for joggers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering recovery.

Unwarranted Passing

Fighting for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, supplying sensitive and skilled legal guidance to ensure compensation.

Vertebral Harm

Specializing in supporting persons with spine impairments, offering specialized legal representation to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​