Slip And Fall Accidents Attorney in Germantown Hills

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Facing a slip and fall accident can be overwhelming, commonly leading to physical injuries, financial distress, and emotional turmoil. Garnering the support of a competent attorney is crucial in such situations. Look no further than Carlson Bier, renowned personal injury lawyers specializing in slip and fall accidents. They are respected pioneers in their domain with an unparalleled commitment to securing justice for their clients. With years of experience under their belts, this Illinois-based firm’s track record speaks volumes about their expertise. Each case is managed meticulously while being empathetic towards client circumstances—a testament to the proficient legal service they extend right from acknowledgment until resolution.

Fighting litigation battles has been made effortless thanks to Carlson Bier’s holistic approach utilizing forensic investigation methods combined with strategic planning for obtaining fair compensation for victims regardless of complexity or challenges presented by an adversary lawyer or insurance company. Reach out without hesitation when disaster strikes; let Carlson Bier bear your burden so you can focus on recovering comfortably—their steadfast assurance extends beyond geographic boundaries that include Germantown Hills too!

About Carlson Bier

Slip And Fall Accidents Lawyers in Germantown Hills Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we strive to guide and advise victims of slip and fall accidents through the complex legal process that follows such unfortunate events. Based in Illinois, our dedicated personal injury attorneys understand the distressing impact these incidents can have on your daily life, affecting not only your health but also your financial stability due to medical expenses and loss of earnings.

Slip and fall accidents fall under the umbrella of premises liability law. This relates to incidents where an individual is injured on another’s property due to unsafe conditions. Critical factors include proving negligence on part of the property owner or manager who failed to maintain a safe environment, leading to the accident.

• Proving negligence involves showing that there was a dangerous condition;

• The property owner was aware or should have been aware of said condition;

• They did nothing prudent within a reasonable period to rectify it;

• As a result of which you were injured.

Considering these complexities comes with its challenges requiring sophisticated legal expertise—a forte, at Carlson Bier. It’s important to remember that each case is unique, hence requiring personalized attention— a core principle our firm embodies while dealing with clients.

Assessing injury severity following a slip-and-fall incident involves various metrics— nature & extent of physical harm, long-term prognosis established by medical professionals regarding recovery potential & future treatment costs including rehabilitation processes are all indispensable aspects for claim calculation. Even non-economic components like pain & suffering endured by our clients hold substantial weightage in this analysis.

Dealing with insurance companies can be daunting after any personal injury. Their aim often steers towards minimizing payouts or denying claims wholly based on technical loopholes around duty-of-care obligations attributed towards their policyholders—the third-party owners responsible for maintaining safe premises. Our attorneys at Carlson Bier are adept at documenting evidences meticulously aligning them strategically so as to deter insurance adjusters from undervaluing claim worthiness rightfully entitled for reparation compensation needs of the victims.

For Illinois residents grappling with practical implications following slip and fall incidents, rely on Carlson Bier to manage your legal journey efficiently bolstered by our detailed educational content catering to such accident lawsuits. Our group has a profound understanding of regional laws thus ideally positioned for residents seeking professional alternatives locally within Illinois jurisdiction realistically refraining from claims about being physically located in towns/specific areas like Germantown Hills where sour firm does not have any physical office presence.

At Carlson Bier, we add value not just through successful case settlements but also by providing comprehensive knowledge power, enabling our clients to feel informed and empowered as they navigate through their judicial encounters – an approach encapsulating compassionate client servicing while uncompromisingly pursuing their claim rights. To learn more about what sets us apart or ascertain potential monetary compensation you might be entitled to considering your specific circumstances based on pain endured, unpaid medical bills piling up or incapacitating disability issues faced restricting daily lifestyle leading eventual job losses— click the button below. Discover how much your case could be worth— taking a step further towards securing financial stability that amicably compensates for distressing times raising hopes for brighter futures ahead.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Germantown Hills Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Slip & Fall Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of slip and fall accidents in Chicago include:

  • Wet or slippery floors: This could include spills, leaks, and snow and ice.
  • Uneven surfaces: This could include potholes, cracks in the pavement, and loose floorboards.
  • Poor lighting: This could make it difficult to see hazards on the ground.
  • Obstructions: This could include cords, boxes, and other objects that are in the way.

If you have a slip and fall accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to the property owner or manager. This will create a record of the accident and help you build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Contact a slip and fall accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a slip and fall accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the property owner or manager if you believe they were negligent in maintaining the property.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a slip and fall accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.

Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for slip and fall accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Germantown Hills

Areas of Practice in Germantown Hills

Pedal Cycle Collisions

Focused on legal representation for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others' indifference or unsafe conditions.

Scald Damages

Extending specialist legal services for people of grave burn injuries caused by mishaps or recklessness.

Physician Incompetence

Providing dedicated legal support for persons affected by medical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Merchandise Obligation

Dealing with cases involving unsafe products, delivering expert legal help to consumers affected by defective items.

Aged Misconduct

Advocating for the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to mistreatment in aged care environments, ensuring restitution.

Fall & Tumble Occurrences

Specialist in managing stumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to individuals seeking recovery for their damages.

Birth Injuries

Supplying legal aid for kin affected by medical negligence resulting in newborn injuries.

Vehicle Crashes

Incidents: Committed to assisting victims of car accidents obtain appropriate compensation for wounds and harm.

Motorbike Accidents

Specializing in providing legal support for individuals involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for damages.

Truck Crash

Extending professional legal services for victims involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for injuries.

Building Incidents

Dedicated to supporting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or recklessness.

Brain Traumas

Committed to offering expert legal services for patients suffering from neurological injuries due to incidents.

Dog Bite Harms

Skilled in managing cases for victims who have suffered harms from dog bites or beast attacks.

Foot-traveler Accidents

Committed to legal support for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering damages.

Wrongful Passing

Striving for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, providing caring and professional legal support to ensure restitution.

Spinal Cord Injury

Focused on defending persons with spinal cord injuries, offering dedicated legal representation to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer