FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Motorcycle Accident Attorney in Grayville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the challenging aftermath of a motorcycle accident, you deserve representation that is both rigorous and compassionate. Carlson Bier provides just that; maintaining an exceptional record in aiding victims seeking justice or fair compensation for their injuries in Grayville. Our team specialises in comprehending the complexities unique to motorcycle accidents, offering unparalleled expertise towards these cases. We grasp not only the attorney’s role but also have deep understanding of medical implications resulting from such traumatic incidents. Making us not only your legal advisors but allies during such testing times while we tirelessly fight for your rights under Illinois laws.

At Carlson Bier, our innovative strategies combined with unrivaled dedication make us stand out; proving time and again why we might just be your top consideration when looking for skilled Motorcycle Accident attorneys serving Grayville clients.

Years of experience arms us with knowledge required to seamlessly navigate through personal injury claims swiftly delivering optimal outcomes matching each client’s individual circumstance — putting their lives back on track after their dreaded ordeal.

Never doubting where you stand legally post-accident becomes possible with Carlson Bier by your side— championing vigorous representation that safeguards riders’ interests throughout Illinois amidst challenging landscape beset by insurance disputes or legal hurdles.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Motorcycle Accident Lawyers in Grayville Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are committed to offering comprehensive legal services to victims of motorcycle accidents throughout Illinois. Recognizing that these accidents often yield the most catastrophic injuries, our distinguished team of personal injury attorneys brings experience, compassion and aggressive representation. Our mission is simple: to defend the rights of injured motorcyclists and secure the best possible financial outcomes for our clients.

Motorcycle accidents typically result in severe injuries due to the lack of protection compared to cars or other transportation mediums. These injuries can include traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury, bone fractures, amputation or even death – all with risk-life consequences. One key point should never be overlooked; consulting a knowledgeable personal injury lawyer could profoundly impact your ability to successfully navigate through complex litigation processes following a devastating accident.

You might wonder why you need a specialized motorcycle accident attorney? Here are some crucial reasons:

• Unbiased investigation: We objectively evaluate each case based on facts and ensure an independent accident reconstruction if needed.

• Negotiation & Representation: With intricate knowledge on insurance companies’ negotiation tactics and rights for motorcyclist under Illinois legal framework.

• Maximizing Compensation: We relentlessly pursue maximum compensation for medical bills, pain & suffering or future treatment plans by considering every law provision.

The laws governing motorcycle accidents in Illinois may appear daunting for someone without a legal background. At Carlson Bier, we believe in enlightening our readers about the fundamentals of these laws:

– The Statute Of Limitations In Illinois: It’s critical to understand that you possess only two years post-accident date to file an injury claim under this rule.

-Liability And Comparative Fault Laws In Illinois: This rule means that if you’re partially at fault (50% or less), you can still receive compensation – albeit reduced by your FAULT% level.

-Negligence Per Se And Motorcycle Accidents in Illinois: This principle implicates anyone who violates traffic law causing an auto accident as negligent per se, and thus liable for any associated damages.

At Carlson Bier, we are continuously striving to provide support and guidance tailored to your unique situation. We understand that deciding on a way forward after a motorcycle accident can be stressful, especially when you’ve suffered significant physical injuries or emotional trauma.

We encourage you to explore our website further; learn more about our approach, background, area of expertise and success stories which validate our dedication towards protecting the rights of motorcycle accident victims. Remember – there are no out- pocket expenses until we win your case! You have nothing to lose but so much to gain: peace of mind in knowing that professional legal help is just a click away!

Finally, it’s not solely about law points – it’s about getting back on your feet post such life-altering incidents with least financial impacts inflicted upon you and your future aspirations. It’s essential for us to remind readers: the aftermath of an accident affects every individual differently – monetarily speaking too! Would you like to understand how much your case might be worth? Let our team assist you in evaluating the potential value of your claim based on various factors including; severity & type of injury, medical costs incurred & anticipated,income loss & overall impact on lifestyle. Click on the button below now – stand up for what is rightfully yours today. After all – at Carlson Bier – Our Fight Is Personal because it is PERSONAL FOR YOU!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Grayville Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Grayville

Areas of Practice in Grayville

Bicycle Incidents

Dedicated to legal assistance for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' negligence or hazardous conditions.

Fire Traumas

Supplying professional legal advice for sufferers of intense burn injuries caused by incidents or recklessness.

Medical Incompetence

Offering dedicated legal advice for persons affected by clinical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Products Fault

Taking on cases involving unsafe products, delivering specialist legal support to individuals affected by faulty goods.

Geriatric Mistreatment

Advocating for the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to mistreatment in senior centers environments, ensuring fairness.

Fall & Tumble Occurrences

Specialist in tackling stumble accident cases, providing legal advice to victims seeking restitution for their harm.

Newborn Traumas

Providing legal guidance for loved ones affected by medical carelessness resulting in newborn injuries.

Motor Incidents

Crashes: Concentrated on helping sufferers of car accidents obtain fair compensation for injuries and harm.

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Specializing in providing representation for motorcyclists involved in scooter accidents, ensuring fair compensation for harm.

18-Wheeler Accident

Ensuring expert legal services for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing just claims for harms.

Building Site Crashes

Committed to representing workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or carelessness.

Brain Traumas

Expert in delivering specialized legal representation for persons suffering from head injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Traumas

Proficient in handling cases for clients who have suffered harms from dog attacks or animal assaults.

Foot-traveler Accidents

Specializing in legal support for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering compensation.

Unwarranted Loss

Advocating for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, extending compassionate and expert legal support to ensure redress.

Neural Trauma

Dedicated to assisting persons with backbone trauma, offering expert legal support to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​