...

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Green Oaks

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering from a spinal cord injury can drastically alter your life. At Carlson Bier, our commitment to clients is unwavering, especially when navigating the complexities of spinal cord injuries cases. As expert personal injury lawyers in Illinois, we understand the profound implications of such injuries on victims and their families. From loss of mobility to financial burdens arising from medical expenses or lost wages due to incapacity; the strain can be overwhelming. That’s why having competent legal representation like Carson Bier is invaluable during these times.

Our attorneys have comprehensive knowledge in handling spinal cord injury claims efficiently and empathetically. Backed by years of experience negotiating with insurance companies and litigating for fair compensation for victims; they tenaciously safeguard victim rights ensuring you receive justice as well as maximum compensation.

Irrespective of location within Illinois, we’ve successfully represented countless victims including those based in Green Oaks earning us numerous accolades amongst past clientele who laud our vigorous advocacy efforts towards securing needed restitutions.

Do not grapple this tough process alone, engage Carlson Bier- trusted allies when dealing with matters so critical that determine your future quality-of-life post-injury circumstances . Trust us for stellar counsel rooted not only in expertise but also empathy every step along the way

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Green Oaks Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are deeply committed to providing superior legal representation for victims of personal injuries, particularly spinal cord injuries. Our Illinois-based personal injury attorneys understand the severity and intricacies associated with these life-altering cases. Due to the sensitivity and urgency that spinal cord injuries demand, we waste no time in gathering evidence, analyzing medical records, consulting experts and crafting an effective strategy tailored around your unique needs.

Spinal Cord Injuries can lead to severe damages initiating from trauma or diseases centering at any point along the spine. Ranging from quadriplegia or tetraplegia (impairment in both arms and legs) to paraplegia (loss of leg/ lower body function), consequences may quickly escalate into permanent disability requiring life-long care. Seek immediate legal help if you or a loved one is facing this traumatic experience as you may be entitled to substantial financial compensation.

Key aspects related directly to Spinal Cord Injury victims’ cases:

• Damage assessment: The gravity of the injury will define how much compensation is potentially due.

• Accident causation: A detailed inquiry into accident specifics is paramount in establishing negligence.

• Lifetime costs evaluation: We ensure projected future medical expenses are imbibed within claims.

• Distress & suffering estimation: Emotional turmoil and lifestyle adjustments also factor into claim evaluations.

Our team at Carlson Bier focuses vigilantly on obtaining maximum recovery results while relieving our clients from unnecessary stress. Our firm’s bedrock stands firmly on commitment and compassion while expediting your claim process so that quality medical care isn’t deterred due to lack of funds especially when fault lies elsewhere.

Considering every spinal injury varies significantly in symptom type, degree of impairment, etc., each case mandates proper forensic examination extending beyond mere medical documentation. Things like victim testimonies detailing drastically altered lifestyles post-accident serve indispensable during trials helping clinch substantial compensations.

Additionally, it becomes crucial for us as lawyers to continually update ourselves on the latest medical advances and evolving treatment costs related to spinal cord injuries. This knowledge becomes instrumental in supporting compensatory claims, particularly when estimating future expenses incurred due to rehab therapy or assistive technology upgrades.

Finally, we understand that dealing with a severe injury is demanding enough let alone worry about potential economic hardships this might impose. Hence, Carlson Bier proudly operates under a contingency fee basis; this entails that unless we win your case or achieve settlement recovery, you owe us nothing.

Once engaged as your legal representation, our commitment becomes unfaltering towards helping you or your loved one get back life’s control after such incapacitating instances. We’ll steadfastly negotiate with insurance companies so not only do your immediate financial needs get met but future requirements are secured well too!

The robust representation from Carlson Bier offers victims of Spinal Cord Injuries the greatest possible opportunity to fully recover unjust damages inflicted upon them due to negligence. Your initiative to involve us early within the claim process greatly enhances chances for optimal restitution, hence consider partnering with us at the earliest convenience for maximized results.

If you’re suffering from a catastrophic spinal cord injury due to another’s recklessness or neglect – Remember: Time IS money when it comes down to personal injuries. And while no amount can adequately compensate for such pain & alteration to life circumstance; securing hardest-hitting financial support could potentially ease niggling monetary worries acting as much-needed relief.

Determined in pursuit of justice, accommodating during challenge-ridden times – Welcome aboard those pursuing justice within Illinois…Let’s fight it out together! Click on the button below now and find out how much your case may actually be worth. Trust Carlson Bier…because YOU matter!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Green Oaks Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Green Oaks

Areas of Practice in Green Oaks

Bicycle Collisions

Focused on legal services for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' lack of care or risky conditions.

Scald Injuries

Providing expert legal advice for sufferers of grave burn injuries caused by accidents or negligence.

Physician Negligence

Providing expert legal advice for patients affected by clinical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Items Accountability

Handling cases involving defective products, delivering specialist legal support to consumers affected by product-related injuries.

Nursing Home Abuse

Protecting the rights of elders who have been subjected to malpractice in elderly care environments, ensuring compensation.

Stumble and Stumble Injuries

Adept in addressing tumble accident cases, providing legal services to individuals seeking compensation for their harm.

Newborn Traumas

Supplying legal assistance for relatives affected by medical incompetence resulting in newborn injuries.

Auto Collisions

Accidents: Concentrated on helping patients of car accidents gain just settlement for injuries and harm.

Motorcycle Incidents

Committed to providing legal advice for motorcyclists involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for injuries.

Truck Mishap

Ensuring experienced legal services for drivers involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing adequate recovery for damages.

Building Mishaps

Committed to advocating for workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or irresponsibility.

Cerebral Impairments

Specializing in providing specialized legal assistance for clients suffering from brain injuries due to carelessness.

Canine Attack Harms

Skilled in managing cases for clients who have suffered traumas from canine attacks or creature assaults.

Jogger Collisions

Expert in legal assistance for joggers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering damages.

Unwarranted Fatality

Standing up for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, providing empathetic and skilled legal representation to ensure redress.

Vertebral Trauma

Committed to representing patients with spine impairments, offering expert legal services to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer