...

Slip And Fall Accidents Attorney in Hazel Crest

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When it comes to navigating the intricacies of Slip And Fall Accident cases, Carlson Bier presents an impeccable choice due to their vast experience and comprehensive understanding of the legal landscape in Illinois. With a stalwart commitment towards safeguarding your rights, our team diligently works round-the-clock for obtaining optimal compensatory damages on your behalf. At Carlson Bier, we meticulously examine every facet of your claim considering nuances such as liability boundaries and property condition norms specific to Hazel Crest area; ensuring all elements are comprehensively evaluated for securing justice. Our refined capability of deciphering complex situations further establishes our firm as an ideal candidate for representing you during Slip And Fall Accidents litigation procedures. Trust us with managing your case – right from documentation through defense strategies till resolution while you focus on healing with peace-of-mind secured by professional hands working tirelessly at Carlson Beir featuring unobtrusive dedication heightened with empathy.

About Carlson Bier

Slip And Fall Accidents Lawyers in Hazel Crest Illinois

In the ever-evolving landscape of personal injury law, slip and fall accidents constitute a significant portion of cases handled by the adept attorneys at Carlson Bier, situated in Illinois. Let’s delve deep into your rights and legal recourse in situations involving injuries resulting from slips, trips, or falls.

Slip and fall incidents are one among many types of premises liability cases. These episodic pandemoniums typically occur when property owners fail to safely maintain their premises, causing unnecessary harm to unsuspecting individuals. Diversely manifested, these dangers range from poorly lit stairwells to wet floors lacking caution signs.

The paramount aspect of any slip and fall case lies in proving negligence: holding someone else legally responsible for your misfortune. Demonstrating that the owner was aware or should have been aware of the hazardous condition but made no effort to rectify it is vitally important for successfully navigating these legal waters. All too often though, true victims may feel daunted by this burden of proof.

However, fear not; at Carlson Bier we possess profound expertise unraveling such intricacies with precision-oriented dedication.

A few relative points to bear in mind include:

• The liability: Not every accident occurring on another’s premises necessarily warrants assigning blame on them.

• Awareness: With regards to residential leasing contexts, tenants could also be held accountable if demonstrated they were aware about a dangerous condition yet failed addressing it.

• Nature Of The Risk: Variances exist between open & obvious risks where foreseeability might not be easily contested unlike latent defects existing unbeknownst to trespassers inviting higher levels of scrutiny.

Given our longevity within this realm coupled with an unparalleled understanding of Illinois-specific statutes akin Personal Injury Law further amplified by a meticulous attention-to-detail approach sets us apart as trusted advocates fully capable navigating you through what likely seems an intimidating process.

We foster an atmosphere replete with empathy blended seamlessly with aggressive mitigation strategies engineered helping you receive due justice. Striking the right balance between compassion towards our clients whilst relentlessly pursuing accountability from those at fault is our unfaltering commitment.

Carlson Bier embodies more than just a name; it bespeaks quality service, untiring representation and resolute protection of your legal entitlements.

Right from investigating liability implications to establishing negligence, coordinating with insurance companies ensuring rightful compensation for medical expenses along with loss of earnings, we stand by your side through thick and thin fighting fiercely for what you’re legally entitled to.

We understand that personal injury law can be complex, but allow us to help simplify it while fashioning sound legal strategies designed aiding swift recovery both physically as well as monetarily With every personalized consultation offered by Carlson Bier’s highly skilled team comprised of proactive paralegals assisted by seasoned attorneys working incessantly decoding associated legal jargon; restitution is never far away.

Each case bears its own unique set of facts, challenges and consequences which necessitate distinguished services tailored to match individual requisites – an understanding driving our work-ethic.

Embarking on this journey may seem an uphill task but taking the first step barely requires any effort: click on the button below eliciting ease you into familiarizing yourself with quantifying worthiness appended to your specific situation irrespective whether during initial consultations or eventual trials.

Importantly, Carlson Bier operates strictly within Illinois adhering faithfully towards all obligatory state-enforced regulations precluding false representations about physical existence or otherwise. We make concerted efforts avoiding even inadvertent violations ensuring ethical cognition punctuates all aspects of our professional interactions which include rightfully not associating us inaccurately suggesting presence beyond where we are truly based.

By clicking on the button below discover how much value your slip and fall case holds wherein seeking fair recompense shall no longer resemble searching for a needle in a haystack instead feel akin hitting an accessible bullseye courtesy Carlson Bier – Personal Injury Attorneys uncompromisingly committed facilitating clients reaching a justified resolution.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Hazel Crest Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Frequently Asked Questions

Slip & Fall Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of slip and fall accidents in Chicago include:

  • Wet or slippery floors: This could include spills, leaks, and snow and ice.
  • Uneven surfaces: This could include potholes, cracks in the pavement, and loose floorboards.
  • Poor lighting: This could make it difficult to see hazards on the ground.
  • Obstructions: This could include cords, boxes, and other objects that are in the way.

If you have a slip and fall accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to the property owner or manager. This will create a record of the accident and help you build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Contact a slip and fall accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a slip and fall accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the property owner or manager if you believe they were negligent in maintaining the property.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a slip and fall accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.

Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for slip and fall accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Hazel Crest

Areas of Practice in Hazel Crest

Bicycle Crashes

Focused on legal support for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others' recklessness or risky conditions.

Flame Wounds

Supplying expert legal advice for people of intense burn injuries caused by occurrences or negligence.

Healthcare Misconduct

Offering experienced legal representation for persons affected by physician malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Items Fault

Handling cases involving faulty products, supplying expert legal support to clients affected by product-related injuries.

Geriatric Misconduct

Protecting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to misconduct in nursing homes environments, ensuring protection.

Stumble and Fall Occurrences

Professional in dealing with slip and fall accident cases, providing legal representation to victims seeking redress for their suffering.

Newborn Wounds

Offering legal help for households affected by medical malpractice resulting in neonatal injuries.

Vehicle Crashes

Incidents: Concentrated on assisting patients of car accidents secure just remuneration for harms and damages.

Bike Accidents

Specializing in providing legal support for victims involved in bike accidents, ensuring just recovery for traumas.

Trucking Collision

Ensuring expert legal assistance for victims involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing just recompense for losses.

Construction Site Crashes

Dedicated to representing laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or carelessness.

Cognitive Damages

Focused on extending professional legal support for patients suffering from cerebral injuries due to negligence.

Canine Attack Traumas

Adept at dealing with cases for clients who have suffered damages from canine attacks or wildlife encounters.

Jogger Crashes

Focused on legal support for walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering restitution.

Unjust Demise

Striving for families affected by a wrongful death, providing empathetic and experienced legal representation to ensure justice.

Vertebral Injury

Focused on advocating for persons with backbone trauma, offering professional legal assistance to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer