...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Hopedale

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with a dog bite injury in Hopedale, it is crucial to seek professional legal assistance. Carlson Bier stands as a remarkable choice, backed by profound expertise and solid reputation within the personal injury law sector. We truly understand the unique legal complexities that come with these daunting situations and strive to leverage our track record of success for your case’s optimal resolution. Being well-versed in Illinois state laws surrounding dog bites, we’re keen on defending victims’ rights robustly against negligent dog owners and their insurance companies. More than just highly competent lawyers, we are compassionate allies who genuinely care about securing justice and appropriate compensation for you amid such distressing circumstances. Let us use our collective experience of handling countless successful cases like yours to turn this unfortunate event around into an opportunity for you to heal undistractedly while we take complete charge of pursuing your deserved claims diligently! Choose excellence par none; choose Carlson Bier’s distinguished team committed exclusively to serve impacted individuals in Hopedale!

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Hopedale Illinois

When it comes to personal injury cases, the team at Carlson Bier understands the nuances and complexities involved in them more than anyone else. We bring a wealth of knowledge to the table on a wide variety of personal injuries, particularly those resulting from dog bite incidents. Dog bites can be traumatic experiences with repercussions that may sometimes extend beyond immediate bodily harm, influencing mental health as well.

Dog bite injuries are interestingly complex because they often involve factors related to pet ownership laws and responsibility for animal behavior. At Carlson Bier, we believe in providing extensive information about such intricacies so that our clients gain an in-depth understanding of their situation. Here’s what you need to know:

• Dog bites can lead to severe infections: Apart from causing painful wounds, dog bites can also facilitate bacterial infections like Septicemia (blood infections) or Pasteurella (a type of bacteria common in animals).

• Mental trauma is a common after-effect: Victims often deal with emotional distress post-incident which could manifest as anxiety or fears relevant to dogs or driven by similar triggering situations.

• There’s a limitation period: In Illinois, the statute of limitations allows two years for filing a legal claim against the owner post-incident.

Understanding your value predicament forms our core approach at Carlson Bier where compassion teams up with competence and concurrently guides you through this process attentively. Our onus revolves around securing fair compensation for medical bills, lost wages during recovery time, any permanent disfiguration sustained alongside pain and suffering endured due to the incident under consideration.

In addition to procuring proper documentation around your dog bite case, including medical reporting services undertaken plus avenues pursued for approaching incident resolution usually empowers your case noticeably:

• Proof of prior aggressive behavior- If available, evidence regarding earlier vicious propensities depicted by the concerned pet substantiates your angle considerably.

• Medical Documentations – Tangible proof detailing severity/extent relating affected wounds or infections plays a crucial part.

• Witness Statement – A statement from an onlooker could prove instrumental in defending your claim.

Bear in mind, every case has unique attributes which resultantly imply that generic advice can’t be sufficient. Therefore, having a professional legal opinion is imperative to assess the true worth and address all particularities of each individual case effectively.

Our team at Carlson Bier stands ready for bringing its vast experience spanned over various personal injury cases into perspectifying the potentials encircling your dog bite injury. To understand the implications enveloping pet ownership laws specifically in Illinois, seeking expert counsel resonates as indispensable; more so because if you’re struggling with administrative jargon or professional medical terminology post your incident, remember that we are here to support you decipher through it all methodically.

Sailing smoothly through the legal process necessitates qualified guidance from not just any law firm, but one with reputed expertise in such situations – precisely where our proficient team at Carlson Bier comes into play by empowering knowledge besides providing systematic directions guiding you throughout this path thereby remaining informed always about your choices plus expected future course.

Your ordeal isn’t ordinary; hence we believe your representation shouldn’t be either. It’s time to replace distressful questions hinging around certainty with contextual clarifications leading towards compensatory justice rightfully deserved by you! So why delay further?

Before clicking the button below, remember – Our exceptional skills paired with a steadfast commitment spell out only one thing clearly: It’s YOUR rights we’re talking about and they matter enormously to us!

Tap below and find out how much your specific case could really be worth! Investing faith wisely is pivotal; trust Carlson Bier- formula tested & trusted across numerous personal injury situations like yours already!

Don’t navigate this journey alone. Partner with professionals who truly care – Your Winning Team awaits eager deployment at Carlson Bier … We’ve got you covered comprehensively indeed!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Hopedale Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Hopedale

Areas of Practice in Hopedale

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Proficient in legal advocacy for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' lack of care or dangerous conditions.

Scald Traumas

Giving skilled legal advice for victims of serious burn injuries caused by occurrences or misconduct.

Hospital Malpractice

Providing experienced legal assistance for clients affected by physician malpractice, including negligent care.

Products Fault

Managing cases involving unsafe products, delivering adept legal guidance to individuals affected by faulty goods.

Senior Neglect

Supporting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to mistreatment in elderly care environments, ensuring protection.

Tumble and Tumble Incidents

Professional in handling stumble accident cases, providing legal advice to clients seeking restitution for their injuries.

Birth Traumas

Delivering legal help for kin affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Collisions

Accidents: Devoted to aiding patients of car accidents receive just remuneration for injuries and losses.

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Dedicated to providing legal support for bikers involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring rightful claims for traumas.

Trucking Mishap

Extending experienced legal advice for clients involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing fair settlement for harms.

Building Crashes

Committed to representing staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Cognitive Injuries

Expert in delivering expert legal representation for clients suffering from cognitive injuries due to accidents.

Canine Attack Harms

Expertise in tackling cases for clients who have suffered harms from K9 assaults or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Accidents

Expert in legal assistance for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering claims.

Unwarranted Passing

Standing up for relatives affected by a wrongful death, offering caring and expert legal guidance to ensure redress.

Vertebral Trauma

Dedicated to representing clients with spinal cord injuries, offering compassionate legal guidance to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer