...

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Ingleside

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Seeking a reliable and experienced Spinal Cord Injuries attorney in Illinois? Carlson Bier should be your foremost choice. With profound understanding of the complexity of Spinal Cord Injuries cases, we are committed to fighting for the rights and compensation that our clients deserve. We possess an impeccable track record, cultivated over years of successful trials involving spinal cord injuries settlements and litigation, all defined by our devotion to quality service. Our attorneys navigate these report-intensive situations with forethought and attention to detail, securing justice while alleviating client stress during their recovery process. Is travelling difficult due to your injury? Not a problem! At Carlson Bier, we value flexibility; our dedicated team is ready to meet you wherever suits you best – even Ingleside! Suffering from a spinal cord injury can drastically alter life’s course; choosing Carlson Bier as your legal representation doesn’t just award peace of mind– it assures unwavering advocacy for utmost compensation packages right here in Illinois.

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Ingleside Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand that sustaining a Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) can be an unprecedented life-altering event. Our personal injury lawyers carry deep legal expertise combined with a rich passion for defending the rights of SCI victims in Illinois and helping them navigate such challenging junctures.

Spinal cord injuries primarily disrupt the two-way communication between your body and brain, often resulting in impairment of sensory, motor, or autonomic function. The implications are vast and complex as they encompass both physiological damage and mental suffering. As the severity depends on “level” and “completeness” of injury, medical prognosis requires specialized understanding which our legal experts bring to you:

– High-Cervical Nerves (C1 – C4): Generally the most severe type of SCI often leading to paralysis or diminished functionality in arms, hands, torso and legs.

– Low-Cervical Nerves (C5 – C7): While these injuries still affect arm and hand movement, patients retain more mobility compared to those with high-cervical nerve injuries.

– Thoracic Nerves (T1 – T12): Injuries here typically affect torso and leg movement but may allow for better control over hands and arms.

– Lumbar Nerves (L1 – L5) & Sacral Nerves: Leads mostly to loss of some hip flexibility & leg functionality.

Living with spinal cord injury impacts not just an individual’s physical health but also their emotional well-being while imposing a financial burden due to increasing medical bills or lost wages. At Carlson Bier, we guarantee that your case is handled diligently; from discussing potential avenues for financial compensation during initial consultation through trial preparation or settlement negotiation if required until conclusion ensuring justice prevails.

Recognizing spinal cord injuries’ inherent complexity makes it necessary for impacted individuals to seek proper representation ensuring adherence to state laws governing personal injury lawsuits. Under Illinois law statute 735 ILCS 5/, one has limited time after injury to file a claim, making it essential to act swiftly. We at Carlson Bier are well versed in Illinois-specific personal injury law and can guide you efficiently on relevant legal timelines and procedures.

At the same time, we commit to demystify any misconceptions surrounding SCI lawsuits; For instance, one doesn’t need to be completely paralyzed before seeking compensation or identifying the negligent party is not always straightforward in SCI cases.

We also dedicate ourselves to helping you understand your compensation rights under two broad categories:

– Economic Damages: Tangible losses such as medical expenses (including future ones), rehab costs, wage loss, etc.

– Non-Economic Damages: Quite subjective & includes pain and suffering, emotional distress, and loss of enjoyment of life.

The devastating consequences that result from a spinal cord injury require an attorney who understands the delicate intricacies of each case—someone who will fight relentlessly for your rights while providing compassionate support during such trying times. Let us at Carlson Bier shoulder your legal battles while you focus on recovery with your loved ones.

Whether it was a car accident or fell down because of unsafe conditions or caused by negligence at workplace leading to spinal cord injury—we believe that being empowered with knowledge equips you better when anticipating courtroom decisions. Yet again every case is distinct; therefore, we endorse personalized counsel over generic advice.

Our mission extends beyond just ending court battles but securing closure through justified compensations enabling our clients towards resilience journey post SCI trauma. If you or someone close suffered from a spinal cord injury due to another’s recklessness or intentional misconduct—you have rights!

Discovering potential worthiness of your claim becomes easier than ever—click on the button below to get started! Our quick yet insightful tool gauges pertinent details about your situation giving typed out results instantly that sets further discourse with our lawyers in specific directions conveniently saving time! Secure justice awaits for those choosing informed diligence across Illinois. Partner with us at Carlson Bier and together we’ll usher a brighter tomorrow despite unfortunate yesteryears.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Ingleside Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Ingleside

Areas of Practice in Ingleside

Bicycle Accidents

Expert in legal representation for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' lack of care or risky conditions.

Thermal Burns

Providing adept legal support for individuals of grave burn injuries caused by events or carelessness.

Physician Negligence

Delivering specialist legal services for clients affected by healthcare malpractice, including surgical errors.

Commodities Obligation

Managing cases involving dangerous products, offering adept legal guidance to clients affected by defective items.

Geriatric Mistreatment

Protecting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to malpractice in aged care environments, ensuring protection.

Tumble and Stumble Injuries

Specialist in handling tumble accident cases, providing legal representation to victims seeking recovery for their damages.

Infant Traumas

Offering legal support for kin affected by medical incompetence resulting in newborn injuries.

Car Crashes

Accidents: Dedicated to supporting victims of car accidents obtain fair recompense for damages and destruction.

Motorbike Crashes

Focused on providing legal support for motorcyclists involved in bike accidents, ensuring just recovery for traumas.

Semi Mishap

Ensuring professional legal services for drivers involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing fair compensation for damages.

Worksite Incidents

Concentrated on advocating for employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or negligence.

Brain Injuries

Expert in delivering specialized legal assistance for individuals suffering from neurological injuries due to incidents.

Canine Attack Traumas

Specialized in addressing cases for persons who have suffered harms from canine attacks or beast attacks.

Foot-traveler Collisions

Focused on legal support for walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering recovery.

Unjust Demise

Working for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, delivering understanding and expert legal services to ensure restitution.

Spine Harm

Committed to supporting persons with spine impairments, offering specialized legal services to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer