Pedestrian Accident Attorney in La Grange Park

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’ve been involved in a pedestrian accident within the La Grange Park area, it’s crucial to seek legal representation from those experienced in this particular arena. Carlson Bier has built its reputation as leading personal injury attorneys, with an impressive record of success handling pedestrian accident cases specifically. This level of expertise is invaluable when it comes to navigating the complexities of Illinois law and ensuring your rights are protected following an incident that can have long-lasting repercussions on your quality of life.

Trusting our team at Carlson Bier means choosing tenacious advocates who will relentlessly pursue justice for you; whether through negotiating with insurance companies or litigating fiercely in court. We recognize that each pedestrian accident case carries its unique set of circumstances which require tailored strategies. We’re dedicated to ensuring all victims receive the compensation they rightly deserve.

Don’t leave such a critical matter up to chance: allow us at Carlson Bier, seasoned experts in Pedestrian Accident Law, steer your journey towards redress and closure securely and proficiently.

About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in La Grange Park Illinois

At the law firm of Carlson Bier, we have built our reputation on advocating for those who have suffered personal injuries as a result of pedestrian accidents. Based in Illinois, our dedicated and highly experienced team of attorneys offers indispensable advice and legal representation at every phase of your claim process.

Pedestrian accidents are far more common than most people realize. In an instant, what begins as a leisurely walk can turn catastrophic due to the negligence or recklessness displayed by motorists. The physical and emotional toll these accidents inflict can be overwhelming; not to mention the spiraling financial costs associated with medical bills and loss of earnings during recovery. As seasoned advocates in pedestrian accident cases, Carlson Bier’s relentless pursuit of justice ensures victims’ rights are upheld while presenting compelling evidence that unequivocally pinpoints liability.

Understanding some key aspects about pedestrian accident laws in Illinois will be beneficial should you find yourself or your loved ones facing such circumstances:

• Duty Of Care: Every driver is legally bound to exercise reasonable care under any given circumstance. Failure to do so resulting in negligent driving behaviors constitutes breach of this duty.

• Pedestrian Rights: Contrary to popular belief, pedestrians hold right-of way above vehicles when crossing streets within marked crossings and when obeying traffic signals.

• Contributory Fault: If a pedestrian is found partly responsible for causing their own injuries, it may reduce the amount they would otherwise recover.

• Damage Recovery: You may seek compensation for losses incurred including but not limited to current & future medical expenses, pain & suffering, lost wages & diminished earning capacity.

Navigating through these intricacies single-handedly can prove mostly impractical. This is where retainment of competent legal counsel truly makes all the difference – our role at Carlson Bier transcends merely demonstrating motorists violated regulations or acted negligently but extends further towards soliciting maximum compensation that you duly deserve.

In tackling your claims head-on ‘no stone left unturned’ fashion, our attorneys meticulously dissect every detail furnished in official police reports alongside eyewitness testimonies. Most crucially, we engage independent accident reconstruction specialists to shed light on elements negligent motorists might exploit to pathetically evade liability.

It’s no secret the aftermath of pedestrian accidents leave victims feeling confused and overwhelmed as they grapple with their new realities. The complexities of filing claims hardly make matters any easier either – but rest assured- at Carlson Bier, prioritizing your interests over anything else is etched deeply in our firm’s ethos; essentially laying the groundwork for a client-lawyer rapport seldom matched elsewhere.

Being subjected to pain and suffering due to another person’s negligence is never justifiable let alone bearable. Your quest for justice deserves undivided attention involving a strategic approach – something we tirelessly strive for – dedicating each day fighting injustice with unmatched passion since being admitted to the bar till date.

At Carlson Bier, ensuring you attain maximum compensation commensurate with your individual case specifics is integral towards closing this tumultuous chapter, allowing you focus entirely on recovery hence reclaiming control over your life – just as it should be all along!

You deserve professional guidance that assures transformative outcomes thus making all difference when it matters most! Wondering how much your pedestrian accident case could potentially be worth? Realize the magnitude of what seasoned legal representation brings forth by simply clicking on the button below now.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For La Grange Park Residents

Links
Legal Blogs
All Attorney Services in La Grange Park

Areas of Practice in La Grange Park

Cycling Mishaps

Dedicated to legal representation for people injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' lack of care or perilous conditions.

Flame Traumas

Extending expert legal assistance for victims of serious burn injuries caused by accidents or misconduct.

Hospital Negligence

Providing experienced legal services for persons affected by physician malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Products Liability

Dealing with cases involving faulty products, delivering professional legal help to customers affected by product-related injuries.

Elder Neglect

Advocating for the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to abuse in elderly care environments, ensuring compensation.

Slip and Fall Incidents

Professional in tackling stumble accident cases, providing legal advice to persons seeking compensation for their injuries.

Childbirth Damages

Extending legal assistance for kin affected by medical malpractice resulting in newborn injuries.

Automobile Accidents

Mishaps: Devoted to helping individuals of car accidents get reasonable settlement for wounds and destruction.

Motorbike Accidents

Expert in providing legal assistance for riders involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring just recovery for losses.

Semi Accident

Delivering experienced legal services for individuals involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing appropriate claims for injuries.

Worksite Accidents

Committed to advocating for laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or carelessness.

Cerebral Damages

Committed to ensuring specialized legal support for persons suffering from neurological injuries due to misconduct.

Canine Attack Traumas

Specialized in addressing cases for clients who have suffered harms from dog bites or beast attacks.

Cross-walker Collisions

Dedicated to legal representation for joggers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering compensation.

Unfair Fatality

Striving for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, supplying compassionate and expert legal representation to ensure compensation.

Spine Trauma

Expert in defending persons with spine impairments, offering professional legal representation to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer