...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Maywood

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When facing the repercussions of dog bite injuries, it is crucial to have dependable legal representation. In Maywood, Carlson Bier offers unparalleled expertise in this area of personal injury law. With a robust understanding of Illinois legislation surrounding such cases, our attorneys are adept at navigating the complexities involved in obtaining just compensation for your pain and suffering. We take pride in our compassionate approach that extends beyond paperwork and courtroom battles; we ensure every client feels seen, heard and supported throughout their recovery journey. Our track record reveals an impressive history filled with victories on behalf of dog bite victims; your case could be next on that list! By choosing Carlson Bier to represent you after a dog-related incident, you’re gaining more than legal counsel – you gain dedicated advocates who fight tirelessly for your cause. Trust us with your case today as we help transform this unfortunate experience into one less burden for you to bear alone.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Maywood Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the gravity of a dog bite incident and are dedicated to representing victims with tenacity and compassion. Our firm headquartered in Illinois specializes in handling personal injury cases, particularly those involving dog bites. Dog bites can result in severe physical harm, psychological trauma, and financial burden due to high medical costs.

Every dog carries the potential risk for unexpected aggression. However, when it results in a bite or attack, the subsequent effects on a victim can be devastating. It is essential to be aware of the common types of injuries related to such incidents:

– Exhibit A: Punctures and lacerations often require stitches or even reconstructive surgery.

– Exhibit B: Fractures could occur if you fall from being attacked or are bitten forcefully.

– Exhibit C: Infections resulting from untreated bites might lead to prolonged discomfort, further complications, or diseases like Rabies.

– Exhibit D: Emotional distress following an aggressive animal attack is not uncommon and should never be dismissed lightly.

When one becomes a victim of these unfortunate occasions, knowing your rights will ensure that negligent parties held responsible for their actions. Under Illinois law, pet owners carry the responsibility for controlling their pets’ behavior. Should an attack occur due to their negligence towards regulated precautions making them liable for sustained damages?

Navigating through legal procedures following a canine bite ordeal may seem daunting; however, pursuing compensation shouldn’t add more agony to your already traumatized state. That’s where Carlson Bier steps in – we work tirelessly so you won’t have to deal with complicated negotiations while ensuring maximum compensation for your suffering.

Our pursuit revolves around several key aspects:

•Proving owner negligence by evidencing lack of preventive measures taken against unregulated interactions between dogs and humans.

•Illustrating depth of sustained damage – beyond immediate medical expenses this includes assessing long-term effects like future treatments needed owing to nerve damage or therapy sessions required due to emotional stress induced by the incident.

•Successfully negotiating with insurance companies, which often tend to undervalue claims, to ensure fair compensation.

Trust Carlson Bier in standing up for your rights. Our mission driven by our dedication and understanding of such sensitive matters, paired with our comprehensive knowledge on Illinois State laws, ensures we do more than just represent you – we support you throughout every step till justice is served.

At this juncture, being proactive equates better chances of gaining deserved compensation. Therefore, if you’ve been victim to a canine bite or know someone who has suffered from one recently– it’s paramount that you take immediate action towards seeking legal assistance. Remember: The road to redemption shouldn’t be traversed alone – having a professional personal injury lawyer by your side could tip the scales heavily in your favor.

We empathize with the ordeal victims face during these trying times; hence at Carlson Bier, we operate purely on a contingency-based policy meaning – there are no upfront fees until we secure victory whilst ensuring justice and entitlement align seamlessly.

Unsure about how much compensation is due for your specific scenario? Each case varies; factors like infection risk severity of injuries long-term emotional trauma and individual circumstances influence potential payout numbers significantly. We urge you to navigate further using the button below – only then willus gain an insight into what’s owed rightfully back to you as per Illinois Law guidelines.

Remember – Every dog byte victim deserves rightful reparation put us on speed dial today – Because at Carlson Bier we don’t measure success through numbers instead Victory counts when Justice speaks loud clear!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Maywood Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Maywood

Areas of Practice in Maywood

Bike Incidents

Dedicated to legal assistance for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' lack of care or perilous conditions.

Fire Wounds

Giving expert legal support for individuals of intense burn injuries caused by incidents or carelessness.

Clinical Incompetence

Delivering professional legal advice for individuals affected by medical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Commodities Responsibility

Taking on cases involving faulty products, offering skilled legal services to individuals affected by defective items.

Elder Malpractice

Protecting the rights of elders who have been subjected to malpractice in nursing homes environments, ensuring fairness.

Fall & Trip Mishaps

Skilled in dealing with slip and fall accident cases, providing legal services to persons seeking compensation for their injuries.

Childbirth Harms

Delivering legal aid for relatives affected by medical incompetence resulting in newborn injuries.

Car Crashes

Incidents: Dedicated to guiding individuals of car accidents gain just recompense for wounds and destruction.

Scooter Mishaps

Expert in providing legal advice for individuals involved in scooter accidents, ensuring just recovery for damages.

Semi Crash

Delivering experienced legal representation for clients involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing rightful recompense for injuries.

Construction Accidents

Engaged in assisting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or irresponsibility.

Neurological Impairments

Committed to offering expert legal advice for persons suffering from brain injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Attack Damages

Specialized in dealing with cases for people who have suffered wounds from K9 assaults or animal assaults.

Jogger Incidents

Focused on legal services for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering claims.

Unfair Passing

Fighting for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, delivering understanding and professional legal assistance to ensure fairness.

Spinal Cord Damage

Focused on assisting victims with paralysis, offering specialized legal assistance to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​