...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Mazon

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with the aftermath of dog bite injuries in Mazon, you need experienced attorneys who are well-versed in the intricacies of Illinois’ liability laws. The seasoned lawyers at Carlson Bier specialize in personal injury claims – particularly those stemming from dog bites. With a strong record of obtaining favorable results for our clients, we ensure that every individual receives the compensation they rightfully deserve.

Dog bite injuries can have severe physical and psychological impacts and it’s critical to be represented by law professionals who understand this complexity. At Carlson Bier, our team is dedicated to providing precise legal guidance tailored uniquely to each case alongside compassionate support each step of the way.

We pride ourselves on thorough investigation methodologies and relentless defense tactics which place us at an advantage during conciliations or trials. Partnering with Carlson Bier means choosing a diligent advocate for your rights after being victimized by a canine attack.

Our firm’s reputation is built not merely upon victories achieved but also on relationships fostered within community confines regardless of boundary lines.Entrusting your case to us could be key towards overturning life-altering situations inflicted by untamed pets into successful recovery stories through rightful justice acquisition. Choose wisely; choose Carlson Bier for handling your Dog Bite Injuries claim.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Mazon Illinois

Welcome to the Carlson Bier, home to industry leaders in the field of personal injury law. As a specialized sector within our wide range of legal services, we offer relentless pursuit and passionate representation for people who have experienced dog bite injuries, based out of Illinois.

Dog bite injuries are some of the most traumatic experiences individuals can undergo, carrying with them both physical pain and emotional distress. The wounds inflicted by these bites often require extensive medical treatment and rehabilitation periods that may sideline you from work or your daily routine. Moreover, such incidents can also result in psychological trauma that necessitates therapy over time.

Understanding this complex interplay between physical and mental health impacts is at the core of what makes our representation so effective. Our team, armed with years of experience in dog bite injury law, possesses a deep understanding of:

– The common types of injuries sustained.

– Possible complications from untreated or poorly treated wounds.

– The approximated costs associated with short-term treatments.

– Long term effects and their potential financial burden.

– Emotional trauma implications post-dog-bite incident.

Knowledge is power when it comes to navigating your recovery process after a dog bite incident. One significant piece to note is that under Illinois State Law, strict liability applies in matters regarding animal attacks. This means irrespective of whether an owner knew about their pet’s dangerous tendencies or not; they are still legally responsible if their pet injures someone else.

We strongly believe victims should never bear financial burdens arising due to others’ negligence. Therefore while you concentrate on recuperating physically and emotionally from such harrowing incidents, let us handle claims for damages including but not limited to; past & future medical bills, lost wages accredited to injury-related absences from work and compensation for pain & suffering endured due to the event.

In addition to highlighting the owner’s responsibility concerning these unfortunate events, other considerations like leash laws violations are also accounted for once you retain our services:

• Was there disregard for the established Illinois leash laws?

• Was there any prior knowledge that the dog may have been a potential risk?

These are but a few areas where expert legal advice might come handy while navigating through these complex issues.

The Carlson Bier brand is synonymous with meticulous attention to detail, ensuring no stone goes unturned in advocating for your rights. Reliable and tenacious, our reputation precedes us as we strive for the best possible outcome for our clients.

Carlson Bier believes in creating strong connections built on trust and empathy—accumulated over years of dedicated service—in allowing us to deliver outstanding results consistently. We understand that our role extends beyond law practice to offer support during challenging times. Providing comfort and assurance that your case will be managed with utmost professionalism and competence can make all difference in reclaiming normalcy after such incidents.

Investigating, documenting, litigating—all phases require unrelenting determination until favorable outcomes materialize. As part of drawing this narrative together, it’s essential to evaluate worthiness meticulously—a process through which we’re ready to walk you through every step of the way at Carlson Bier.

Our door remains open virtually via online platforms or physically within permissible guidelines out of our main office based here in Illinois. Whether you seek consultations about potential claims or strategies on current settlements negotiations—we’re here ready to help!

Take action now! Click on the button below to find out how much your case could potentially be worth; remember time can be an extremely crucial factor when it comes down disputing personal injury cases. Our team awaits eagerly prepared to fight passionately for your rights because at Carlson Bier – We battle bullies, every day!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Mazon Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Mazon

Areas of Practice in Mazon

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Expert in legal advocacy for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' recklessness or unsafe conditions.

Fire Damages

Extending expert legal help for people of major burn injuries caused by events or negligence.

Healthcare Malpractice

Extending professional legal services for individuals affected by hospital malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Merchandise Liability

Managing cases involving unsafe products, extending specialist legal guidance to consumers affected by product-related injuries.

Senior Mistreatment

Supporting the rights of elders who have been subjected to misconduct in senior centers environments, ensuring restitution.

Tumble and Stumble Occurrences

Specialist in addressing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal support to sufferers seeking justice for their damages.

Newborn Harms

Offering legal guidance for households affected by medical negligence resulting in newborn injuries.

Car Mishaps

Accidents: Focused on aiding clients of car accidents obtain just compensation for hurts and harm.

Motorcycle Incidents

Committed to providing representation for victims involved in scooter accidents, ensuring just recovery for damages.

Trucking Accident

Ensuring adept legal support for individuals involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing rightful recovery for injuries.

Worksite Crashes

Engaged in advocating for workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or recklessness.

Cerebral Traumas

Dedicated to offering specialized legal advice for persons suffering from cognitive injuries due to misconduct.

Canine Attack Injuries

Expertise in dealing with cases for persons who have suffered damages from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Collisions

Committed to legal services for joggers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering recovery.

Unfair Loss

Working for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, offering caring and professional legal assistance to ensure justice.

Spine Damage

Focused on advocating for patients with paralysis, offering compassionate legal assistance to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer