...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Portage Park

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When seeking representation for dog bite injuries in Portage Park, Carlson Bier emerges as a prime consideration among personal injury lawyer firms. Championing an unparalleled commitment to their clients and adept mastery of the legal landscape concerning dog bite accidents, this Illinois-based team diligently investigates each case and equips you with the information necessary to make informed decisions moving forward. The expert attorneys at Carlson Bier advocate assertively on your behalf, ensuring victims receive ample compensation for medical bills, pain and suffering induced by such traumatic incidents. They understand all too well the physical wounds and emotional stress associated with these uniquely distressing occurrences—empathy woven into their work ethic striving toward favorable outcomes. Built upon a legacy of trust, quality service delivery suiting individual needs is significant within its operation framework—you are not just another statistic; you matter decidedly here at Carlson Bier. Offering unrivaled client-centric attention along with strategic litigation techniques backed by years of experience gives them an edge over others when considering law firms that cater remarkably well to cases related specifically to Dog Bite Injuries around Portage Park region in Illinois.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Portage Park Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our expertise extends to a variety of Personal Injury areas, one such area being dog bite incidents in Illinois. We understand the trauma and physical injuries that can come from something as unexpected and violent as a dog attack. It’s our mission to ensure victims receive the necessary legal support during this trying time.

Being bitten by a dog can lead to serious medical complications that are often unseen at first glance. These include the obvious like puncture wounds or skin lacerations but extend to secondary health issues such as infections or even psychological trauma. In some cases, the victim might require surgery or ongoing treatment which may result in substantial financial strain.

In Illinois, there is stringent legislation known as Animal Control Act which holds pet owners accountable if their animal causes harm irrespective of whether the incident happened on public or private property. Further, many victims fail to realize they may be eligible for compensation not only for medical bills but also for non-economic damages like pain and suffering, emotional distress and lost earnings.

Here are some key points regarding Dog Bite law in Illinois:

– The dog owner is liable for any injury inflicted by his/her pet.

– Liability applies regardless of prior knowledge about the dog’s potential aggressiveness.

– No negligence needs to be proven against the pet owner; however, claims are denied if it’s shown that the victim provoked the animal.

– Compensation covers both economic (medical expenses, loss of income) & non-economic damages (psychological trauma).

What is equally important when dealing with such a case is understanding what steps you need immediately after an attack. Start by seeking prompt medical attention no matter how minor your wound seems initially. Report your incident promptly to local authorities who monitor animal behavior closely – these reports will aid your legal claim later. Always gather evidence including photographs of injuries and surroundings where possible.

As personal injury attorneys specializing in dog bite accidents at Carlson Bier, we stand ready-meaning prepared with deep knowledge and sharp argumentation skills, ensuring those negligent are held responsible. We work diligently to help our clients navigate the complex legal landscape of Illinois, guiding them from the moment of initial consultation through each step of their claim.

Dog bite injuries can be stressful to handle alone – we’re here to assure you that you don’t have to undergo this ordeal without solid legal support. Our commitment stands unwavering to tirelessly fight for your rights and obtain the compensation you undeniably deserve.

In choosing Carlson Bier, not only do you hire a law firm with an outstanding record in handling dog bite injury cases, but also a team genuinely concerned about your holistic wellbeing beyond your physical recovery.

At Carlson Bier we believe knowledge is power – the more informed our clients are about their situation, the better they can make impactful decisions regarding their representation and subsequent course of action. That’s why we offer free case evaluations giving potential clients insight into what compensation could result from pursuing a claim for their damages.

If you or somebody close has been a victim of a vicious animal attack, get in touch with us right away. Let us assess your unique circumstance and advise you on how best to proceed legally given details particular to your case. Remember there’s no obligation when contacting us; it’s just about understanding where you stand after having sustained such personal injury due to another party’s negligence.

Wondering what your case might be worth? Click on the button below so our dedicated attorneys at Carlson Bier can give detailed insights into possible avenues for restitution at no extra cost as part of our efforts prioritizing client education over formalities providing quality representation always keeping heinous actions accountable under robust Illinois Law.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Portage Park Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Portage Park

Areas of Practice in Portage Park

Bike Crashes

Proficient in legal support for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others' recklessness or dangerous conditions.

Thermal Injuries

Giving professional legal advice for victims of intense burn injuries caused by mishaps or negligence.

Hospital Negligence

Extending dedicated legal assistance for individuals affected by hospital malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Items Obligation

Dealing with cases involving problematic products, delivering expert legal assistance to customers affected by harmful products.

Elder Misconduct

Protecting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to misconduct in aged care environments, ensuring restitution.

Fall and Slip Accidents

Expert in managing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal assistance to clients seeking recovery for their suffering.

Birth Damages

Delivering legal support for loved ones affected by medical negligence resulting in newborn injuries.

Motor Mishaps

Mishaps: Focused on helping sufferers of car accidents obtain fair payout for damages and losses.

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Committed to providing legal services for individuals involved in bike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for damages.

18-Wheeler Incident

Providing professional legal advice for persons involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recovery for harms.

Building Site Collisions

Committed to representing laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or carelessness.

Head Harms

Expert in providing dedicated legal assistance for patients suffering from neurological injuries due to negligence.

Canine Attack Wounds

Adept at addressing cases for people who have suffered traumas from K9 assaults or animal attacks.

Pedestrian Accidents

Dedicated to legal assistance for joggers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering claims.

Unfair Loss

Striving for families affected by a wrongful death, delivering caring and professional legal services to ensure restitution.

Spinal Cord Harm

Specializing in advocating for clients with spine impairments, offering specialized legal support to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer