...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Personal Injury Attorney in Roseville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you become a victim of personal injury in Roseville, Carlson Bier is an excellent choice as your trusted ally to navigate the legal process. Our top-notch expertise sets us apart from others; with rigorous specialization in personal injury law, we’re unfalteringly prepared to seek justice for you diligently and efficiently. Years of experience have honed our understanding and tenacity, providing reassurance that your case will be handled judiciously regardless of complexity.

Carlson Bier deeply comprehends the significant impact such incidents can thrust upon individuals’ lives—physical trauma, emotional distress, financial burdens are just examples among many challenges victims face. Therefore we make it our mission to alleviate these hardships by delivering unwavering legal support.

We pride ourselves on adopting a client-first strategy which means being meticulously detail-oriented when studying your unique circumstances then customizing solutions tailored exclusively for you.

When considering who should represent you in court or negotiations during these stressful times – think no further than Carlson Bier. We fight relentlessly while embodying empathy every step along this journey towards attaining rightful compensation and achieving peace of mind for those wrongfully injured.

Choose excellence; choose Carlson Bier!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Personal Injury Lawyers in Roseville Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in handling personal injury cases with a firm commitment to providing you with the excellent representation you deserve. As experienced attorneys based out of Illinois, we understand that every case has unique facets and details that require astute attention. Personal injuries can disrupt your life significantly, leading not only to physical pain but also emotional distress and financial hardship. However, the law provides a mechanism for individuals to seek fair compensation.

One of our main areas of focus is vehicular accidents. These often result in significant personal injuries from whiplash to more serious damages like spinal cord injuries or traumatic brain injuries. If you’re involved in such an accident because another party was negligent, reckless, or violated road safety rules, it’s crucial that you consult us for professional guidance on navigating these complex legal issues.

Slip-and-fall incidents are another prevalent type of personal injury case we handle at Carlson Bier. Whether caused by wet floors without appropriate signage or uneven sidewalks not maintained properly by responsible parties, they can lead to severe physical harm including broken bones and head injuries. It’s vital that victims understand their rights under premises liability laws—the duty imposed on property owners to maintain safe environments.

Workplace accidents also form a substantive portion of personal injury lawsuits. From construction sites accidents involving heavy equipment failures to office-based incidents like ergonomic issues leading to repetitive strain injuries—workers possess certain rights when hurt on duty owing predominantly due the employer’s negligence.

We stand by medical malpractice victims too at Carlson Bier—a complex but critical area of personal injury law where healthcare professionals’ negligence leads to patient harm—from surgical errors and incorrect diagnoses, delayed treatments or pharmaceutical mistakes.

• Vehicular Accidents: Negligent drivers ought to be held accountable for causing harm through recklessness.

• Slip-and-Fall Incidents: Property owners’ failure maintaining safety standards shouldn’t result in your suffering.

• Workplace Accidents: Employers need fulfilling their duty to ensure a safe and secure work environment.

• Medical Malpractice: Healthcare professionals making grave errors don’t deserve immunity from legal consequences.

At Carlson Bier, we strive for utmost transparent communication with our clients. As part of this commitment, we follow a ‘No Recovery, No Fee’ policy – meaning you won’t owe us anything unless we procure a favorable result in your case. Our endeavour is to provide quality legal representation while minimizing the financial burden on you throughout this stressing period.

Our process starts with an exhaustive consultation where we discuss every aspect of your incident—from the circumstances leading to the injury, your medical treatments undertaken or anticipated rehabilitation costs—to calculate potential compensation figures realistically. It’s this comprehensive approach that helps effectively build a strong case against those responsible for causing undue pain and suffering in your life.

Whether it’s negotiating aggressively with erring parties/insurers toward securing deserved settlements or representing you compellingly before juries at trials—if required—we enthusiastically delve into all avenues ensuring justice prevails.

In a world of uncertainties, offering committed legal support may well be one surety you can depend upon following personal injuries disrupting lives. Equipped with vast experience and dedication to relentless client advocacy—Carlson Bier stands ready helping navigate these challenging times.

Take the vital first step towards safeguarding your interests today by clicking the button below—and let’s together figure out claiming what rightfully belongs to you! Calculate now, how much worth is waiting for you just a click away… because amidst adversity—you’re never alone when Carlson Bier stands by!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Roseville Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Roseville

Areas of Practice in Roseville

Pedal Cycle Accidents

Focused on legal services for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others' indifference or unsafe conditions.

Fire Damages

Extending professional legal help for sufferers of severe burn injuries caused by mishaps or misconduct.

Healthcare Carelessness

Offering professional legal support for patients affected by healthcare malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Products Accountability

Managing cases involving problematic products, offering expert legal assistance to clients affected by product malfunctions.

Geriatric Abuse

Defending the rights of seniors who have been subjected to misconduct in nursing homes environments, ensuring compensation.

Fall & Slip Occurrences

Expert in dealing with slip and fall accident cases, providing legal advice to clients seeking justice for their harm.

Birth Injuries

Extending legal help for kin affected by medical incompetence resulting in infant injuries.

Automobile Incidents

Collisions: Concentrated on supporting clients of car accidents secure fair recompense for harms and impairment.

Motorcycle Crashes

Expert in providing legal services for victims involved in bike accidents, ensuring just recovery for injuries.

18-Wheeler Incident

Providing experienced legal support for drivers involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing fair settlement for losses.

Building Site Accidents

Dedicated to representing workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or recklessness.

Cerebral Damages

Specializing in providing dedicated legal services for patients suffering from brain injuries due to accidents.

K9 Assault Wounds

Adept at handling cases for individuals who have suffered damages from puppy bites or beast attacks.

Pedestrian Incidents

Focused on legal assistance for joggers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering damages.

Unfair Demise

Advocating for relatives affected by a wrongful death, delivering caring and experienced legal guidance to ensure fairness.

Vertebral Injury

Committed to assisting persons with paralysis, offering expert legal representation to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​