Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Shabbona

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When it comes to pedestrian accidents in Shabbona, choosing the right legal ally is critical, and Carlson Bier stands unmatched. Our team of highly qualified Pedestrian Accident attorneys has an exemplary record for obtaining comprehensive compensation for victims adversely affected by such unfortunate incidents. Each case represents a unique narrative, and at Carlson Bier, we painstakingly build defense strategies that cater to all intricacies involved. From collating evidence and identifying liable parties to navigating complex negotiations with insurance companies; our firm ensures every facet of your claim is meticulously examined. With years of practical involvement across various Illinois courtrooms under our belt, rest assured you’re entrusting your case to proven professionals who are fully committed to defending your rights and interests relentlessly–we strive not only towards just settlements but also ensure peace of mind throughout what can be an overwhelming process. For strategic guidance underscored by outstanding litigation expertise when dealing with pedestrian-related crashes in Shabbona—Carlson Bier is unquestionably the best choice.

About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Shabbona Illinois

Ensuring the safety of pedestrians is a concern everyone should share, yet every day, we witness accidents occurring due to negligence or distraction. Carlson Bier is dedicated to providing professional legal help for victims of pedestrian accidents throughout Illinois.

Pedestrian accidents can occur in numerous unexpected situations: while crossing the street, walking along sidewalks, or even during recreational jogging. Many results from distractions such as texting and driving or failing to obey traffic signals. Speeding vehicles and drunken drivers are also culprits contributing towards these unfortunate events.

Understanding pedestrian rights is essential in filing for a claim after an accident:

• Pedestrians have the right-of-way: In most cases where there are a designated crosswalk or intersection with no applied traffic controls, pedestrians have the lawful precedence.

• Right to safe sidewalks: Every pedestrian has the justified entitlement for unobstructed, well-maintained walkways.

• Expectation of responsible driving: Drivers need to exercise reasonable care on roadways involving all commonsensical conduct like speed control and vigilant observation.

If you’ve been injured as a pedestrian due to someone’s else negligence, it’s crucial that you speak with an experienced personal injury attorney who can guide you through this challenging time.

At Carlson Bier, we understand how traumatic these incidents can be. Not only do they cause physical pain and suffering but also attract significant medical expenses and potential loss of income owing to extended recovery periods. Our mission is primarily aimed at helping victims gain rightful compensation that covers their medical costs, lost wages due to inability work during healing phase and any additional distress incorporated by this ordeal.

Possessing detailed knowledge about laws governing pedestrian safety in Illinois assists us considerably while handling such claims with competence:

• Modified Comparative Negligence Law: This implies if your fault exceeds 50%, your damages may reduce proportionally reflecting same magnitude.

• Statutes of Limitations limitation stipulate that typically personal injury lawsuits must file within two years from the date of your accident.

When a pedestrian accident happens, it’s pivotal that you acquire evidence promulgation substantiating your claim. This may consist of physical evidence such as clothing and personal items damaged in the mishap, photographs of scene elucidating skid marks, vehicle debris or location details alongside eyewitness testimonies. Noting down essential aspects like weather conditions, traffic signals status at the time can be resourceful in solidifying your case.

At Carlson Bier, we pride ourselves on devoting personalized attention to our clients. We understand that every situation is different; each requiring unique strategies for optimal resolution. Our team perseveres tirelessly to dispute any allegations against our clients fiercely and negotiate diligently with insurance providers ensuring fair outcomes aligning our client’s rightful entitlements.

If you are suffering due to someone else’s negligence or reckless behavior, remember you are not alone. The dedicated lawyers at Carlson Bier are ready to advocate permeatingly on your behalf recovering maximum compensation feasible under Illinois law. Perseverance navigated through efficiency and empathy — those are tokens embedded into our service doctrine inherently of representing injury victims throughout Illinois with diligence and dedication.

We invite you now to initiate this crucial legal compendium transpired by responsibility towards justice retrieval reprieve. Click the button below and find out how much your case could potentially be worth working along side seasoned professionals vigilantly defending your rights with unwavering commitment.

Pedestrian safety isn’t casual or laid back discourse but a matter concomitant attaching significant repercussions when overlooked unwarily destined leading sorrow-bound path casualties random angekurten bystanders leisurely cognition disengagement bursting exclamation dread shocking immediate surround silence impending aftermath ensnare – Carlson Bier vehemently believes it shouldn’t have to be precipitous predicament — let us help rectify jus post bellum transgression fate encroaches hapless pedestrians unbeknownst jeopardy unleash upon.

Remember, you have rights and they should be defended — speak up for yourself, reach out to professionals at Carlson Bier who hold expertise in the realm of Illinois pedestrian accident law today.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Shabbona Residents

Links
Legal Blogs
All Attorney Services in Shabbona

Areas of Practice in Shabbona

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Dedicated to legal support for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others' negligence or perilous conditions.

Fire Wounds

Giving skilled legal help for patients of severe burn injuries caused by incidents or misconduct.

Medical Malpractice

Delivering professional legal services for persons affected by physician malpractice, including surgical errors.

Commodities Fault

Addressing cases involving faulty products, supplying professional legal assistance to customers affected by product-related injuries.

Aged Misconduct

Advocating for the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to misconduct in elderly care environments, ensuring compensation.

Slip & Trip Accidents

Expert in handling stumble accident cases, providing legal representation to clients seeking redress for their suffering.

Childbirth Wounds

Providing legal assistance for households affected by medical incompetence resulting in infant injuries.

Automobile Incidents

Mishaps: Concentrated on guiding victims of car accidents obtain appropriate payout for damages and destruction.

Bike Mishaps

Committed to providing representation for individuals involved in scooter accidents, ensuring justice for traumas.

18-Wheeler Crash

Delivering specialist legal advice for persons involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing adequate settlement for hurts.

Building Crashes

Dedicated to assisting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or carelessness.

Head Impairments

Expert in providing professional legal representation for clients suffering from cerebral injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Wounds

Expertise in handling cases for victims who have suffered wounds from dog bites or wildlife encounters.

Pedestrian Mishaps

Committed to legal advocacy for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering damages.

Unfair Fatality

Striving for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, providing caring and professional legal guidance to ensure justice.

Spinal Cord Injury

Focused on defending individuals with spine impairments, offering dedicated legal services to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer