...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Woodhull

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Accidents involving dog bites can be highly distressing and impactful for victims. Carlson Bier, an established law firm operating in Illinois, specializes in cases relating to Dog Bite Injuries. Our dedicated team is committed to securing justice and compensation for those affected by such incidents throughout Woodhull and surrounding regions. The lawyers at Carlson Bier come with a years’ worth of experience handling personal injury claims linked to dog bite injuries specifically; this substantial know-how promises optimal outcomes for clients seeking legal recourse following an incident. Recognizing the complexities attached to every case, we underscore personalized service as our trademark practice norm. From initial consultation through lawsuit finalization, the distinctive approach defined by empathy and education ensures client reassurance during challenging times. Why choose us? With Carlson Bier – confidence comes standard! You’re entrusting your case into the hands of experts capable of navigating nuanced legal landscapes seamlessly thus maximizing rightful entitlements. Considering legal action post a dog bite injury? Explore support options with Carlson Bier today!

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Woodhull Illinois

With a proud lineage of safeguarding the rights of those harmed by others, Carlson Bier offers unwavering legal services as personal injury lawyers based in Illinois. A central area of our practice involves representing victims of dog bites, an unfortunate event that leads to physical injuries and emotional trauma. Dog bite injuries can impose severe consequences involving costly medical bills, lost time from work and life-altering discomforts.

According to Illinois law, the owner or keeper of a pet is held “strictly liable” for any harm their animal causes. This means that if you are the victim of a dog bite, you typically do not need to prove recklessness or negligence on the part of the dog’s owner to recover damages. Yet bringing a successful claim demands thorough knowledge and a strategic approach towards facts such as:

• The identity of the dog and its owner

• Reporting promptly about the incident

• Nature stringency of injuries

Understanding these factors can make all difference when seeking compensation under Illinois Law.

Carlson Bier’s adept team goes beyond winning your case; we understand that dog bites have lasting effects beyond physical wounds. Sometimes healing extends past stitching up lacerations or administering rabies shots – victims often confront psychological scars long after an attack occurs. We ensure that this is taken into account whilst claiming compensation so your recovery cost doesn’t deplete your pocket but rightfully comes from accountable sources.

The State law emphasizes compassionately upon survivors granting them deserved legal remedies for constantly varied scenarios like:

• Aggressive dogs with known violent tendencies causing injury.

• Dogs left unleashed in public places leading to unprovoked attacks.

• Nerve damage incidents pertaining direct responsibility towards caretakers.

While each case carries unique characteristics, our devotion to comprehensive investigation allows us scrutinizing distinctive factors influencing final compensations till justice meets satisfaction.

Medical expenses associated with dog bite incidents can burgeon rapidly due to surgeries, medications, counseling sessions causing havoc on financial stability. It is crucial to work with a seasoned team like ours at Carlson Bier, attuned to Illinois legislation correctly interpreting legal rights entitled to clients–we take pride in our track record of securing substantial verdicts or settlements for victims impacted by these traumatic incidents.

But why choose us at Carlson Bier?

• Professional Acumen: Our diverse experience in personal injury law equips us for the intricacies each case offers.

• Empathetic Representation: We are unyielding advocates, striving relentlessly till we procure rightful compensation following setbacks.

• No Win-No Pay Policy: To diminish your distress, we only charge attorney fees after successful compensatory disbursement—so we share stakes riding on the favorable resolution of your case.

It’s crucial that from immediately after an incident of dog bite until navigating through compensation demand processes; you have proficient attorneys from Carlson Bier alongside. Each decision made can potentially influence case outcomes remarkably – hence having a dedicated team carrying years of invaluable hard-won experience poised upon client’s needs makes all the difference.

Victims recovering with trust placed in proper hands so they don’t worry about the best approach towards earning deserved justice but focus wholeheartedly upon physical and emotional healing – this is where satisfaction truly counts for every effort contributed by Carlson Bier! Remember being alone if ever confronting adversities is never an option when you have us working tirelessly around resolving most complicated hiccups relieving burdensome challenges off your shoulders.

After reading thus far, should you curious about ‘How much could I earn as compensation?’ Well, factors involving severity damages suffered due to dog bites differ throughout cases due credit accorded towards complexity associated—brace yourselves as preparing requisite claims while negotiating through layers circumscribing lawful commitments isn’t a straightforward task always promising predictable results!

Nonetheless, safeguards exist with potential turning overwhelming odds favorably by adeptly strategizing steps heading towards vindicated representation. Uncertain about where to begin? Simply click the button below! Unravel mystery enshrining how many dollars worth your case stacks up within Illinois jurisdiction adroitly handled by law maestros of Carlson Bier, settling for nothing less maximized fair compensations merited justice weighs duly upon scales!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Woodhull Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Woodhull

Areas of Practice in Woodhull

Bike Incidents

Specializing in legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' indifference or dangerous conditions.

Burn Damages

Supplying expert legal services for patients of severe burn injuries caused by events or negligence.

Medical Incompetence

Providing dedicated legal advice for patients affected by hospital malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Products Obligation

Managing cases involving problematic products, providing adept legal assistance to victims affected by product-related injuries.

Geriatric Misconduct

Representing the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to neglect in elderly care environments, ensuring protection.

Tumble & Trip Mishaps

Skilled in handling tumble accident cases, providing legal services to clients seeking redress for their injuries.

Infant Traumas

Offering legal guidance for kin affected by medical malpractice resulting in childbirth injuries.

Automobile Crashes

Incidents: Committed to supporting patients of car accidents gain appropriate compensation for damages and impairment.

Bike Mishaps

Committed to providing legal support for riders involved in scooter accidents, ensuring rightful claims for losses.

Big Rig Collision

Extending expert legal representation for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing just recovery for injuries.

Worksite Mishaps

Focused on supporting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or irresponsibility.

Head Traumas

Specializing in ensuring professional legal support for victims suffering from neurological injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Bite Damages

Proficient in handling cases for victims who have suffered injuries from puppy bites or beast attacks.

Foot-traveler Accidents

Specializing in legal support for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering recovery.

Unfair Loss

Fighting for families affected by a wrongful death, extending caring and experienced legal representation to ensure restitution.

Vertebral Impairment

Focused on assisting persons with backbone trauma, offering specialized legal assistance to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer