Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Woodhull

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When in need of a Pedestrian Accident lawyer, Carlson Bier Law Firm stands out as the ideal choice. We are renowned for our vast experience handling such cases and we have built an admirable track record throughout Illinois. Our expertise’s cornerstone lies within building strong case strategies rooted in exhaustive investigations to pinpoint liable parties and ensure fair compensation for clients victimized by such pedestrian accidents. With Carlson Bier, your fight is ours too – devotedly providing counsel with compassion, respectfulness while acting fiercely against wrongdoing or negligence that may have led to the unfortunate accident. Retaining us means counting on legal representation fully committed to uphold your rights whilst guiding you through every step until justice is served. Though based outside Woodhull, Carlton Bier has built relationships statewide– proving time again our commitment towards rectifying injuries experienced from pedestrian accidents across cities irrespective of location limitations.

About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Woodhull Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the ordeal that you go through as a victim of a pedestrian accident. Often times these accidents occur when least expected and can drastically change your life within seconds. Devastating injuries or even loss of life could result from such unfortunate incidents, thereby ushering in emotional trauma alongside physical pain. However, one crucial fact to remember is, legal recourse is available and our staunch team of Personal Injury Attorneys stand ready to explore every avenue possible in ensuring justice for you.

As leading Personal Injury Lawyers based in Illinois, we handle an extensive range of personal injury cases with an emphasis on Pedestrian Accidents. These cases typically involve people who have been injured owing to the negligence or recklessness of drivers on our roads. To paint a clearer picture about pedestrian accidents in Illinois, here are vital highlights:

• Pedestrians possess the right-of-way at marked crosswalks

• Drivers have a responsibility to yield at signaled intersections during relevant signal phases

• Under no circumstances should drivers overtake other vehicles stopped at a crosswalk

Understanding these can be essential while establishing liability in potential lawsuits.

Of primary importance following a pedestrian accident is pursuing medical treatment immediately post-incident. Preserving evidence such as conversational snippets with the driver involved also plays pivotal roles in substantiating your case down the line. If faced with challenges getting cooperation from insurance companies regarding claim settlement; keep calm and engage us – experience has taught us that their first offer is rarely their best!

It’s perfectly understandable if being thrown into this situation likely gets you feeling overwhelmed and disoriented about next steps – allow our seasoned team at Carlson Bier bridge this gap for you courageously and competently! Our work starts with initial consultations wherein we diligently gather facts surrounding your case – mapping it against existing legislations thusly arming ourselves with requisite information necessary to robustly champion for your rights.

Acting swiftly offers you dual benefits; firstly, you are likely to have access to crucial evidence required for your case that could potentially get disappeared over time and secondly, Illinois statute of limitations requires personal injury lawsuits grounded on negligence to be filed within two years starting from the date when accident happened. Post this given timeframe, court is bound by duty to refuse entertaining such legal actions thereby making successful claim virtually impossible.

Aiding victims of pedestrian accidents navigate through stressful aftermaths forms an essential part of our calling here at Carlson Bier. Each experience is unique and laden with varying levels of complexities meriting individualized attention – something we take very seriously as reputable Personal Injury Lawyers operating in Illinois.

Remember, not every law firm has the specialized knowledge and aptitude necessary to handle intricacies linked with pedestrian accidents but rest assured, our team combines outstanding expertise coupled with a compassionate approach assisting you throughout process infused with respect and sensitivity you undeniably deserve.

Finally, isn’t it logical wanting to know how much your case may actually be worth? Are financial compensations in picture really substantial enough justifying adoption of legal avenues available post-accident? We certainly think so! While amount received as compensation does vary per situation specifics – it’s definitively reassuring knowing beforehand extent of obtaining rightful legal outcomes favorable towards restoring normalcy back into life!

Hence as a next step, we warmly invite you to click on the button below allowing us run free assessment thus providing ballpark figures relative to worthiness of your particular pedestrian accident case. The journey towards healing begins now – let us walk alongside inching closer towards promised justice one steadfast stride at a time!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Woodhull Residents

Links
Legal Blogs
All Attorney Services in Woodhull

Areas of Practice in Woodhull

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Focused on legal representation for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others's negligence or risky conditions.

Burn Traumas

Extending adept legal help for sufferers of major burn injuries caused by occurrences or carelessness.

Clinical Negligence

Extending professional legal advice for individuals affected by healthcare malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Merchandise Liability

Managing cases involving defective products, extending adept legal guidance to individuals affected by product-related injuries.

Geriatric Mistreatment

Protecting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to abuse in nursing homes environments, ensuring compensation.

Tumble & Stumble Incidents

Expert in addressing stumble accident cases, providing legal advice to individuals seeking justice for their losses.

Birth Injuries

Extending legal help for families affected by medical malpractice resulting in childbirth injuries.

Car Crashes

Collisions: Dedicated to guiding sufferers of car accidents obtain reasonable compensation for wounds and destruction.

Scooter Incidents

Committed to providing legal support for victims involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring justice for losses.

18-Wheeler Collision

Extending professional legal support for persons involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing fair recovery for hurts.

Building Site Incidents

Concentrated on representing staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or negligence.

Head Harms

Committed to delivering professional legal services for patients suffering from head injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Wounds

Skilled in handling cases for persons who have suffered damages from dog bites or creature assaults.

Jogger Crashes

Expert in legal advocacy for joggers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering claims.

Wrongful Demise

Working for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, providing sensitive and professional legal assistance to ensure redress.

Vertebral Trauma

Specializing in representing victims with spinal cord injuries, offering expert legal guidance to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer