...

Personal Injury Attorney in Prairie du Rocher

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with a personal injury dilemma in Prairie du Rocher, you want the reassurance of expert legal representation. That’s precisely where Carlson Bier comes into play. As proven Personal Injury attorneys, we pride ourselves on our tenacious advocacy for justice, backed by substantial experience handling complex cases throughout Illinois. Our thorough knowledge and understanding of Personal Injury law allow us to provide unparalleled service when it matters most. At Carlson Bier, your pain is not just another case; it’s an opportunity for us to stand up for your rights and work diligently towards obtaining the maximum compensation you deserve. With firm dedication to pursuing justice, unwavering commitment to each client’s unique needs and wellbeing – Carlson Bier distinguishes itself as a beacon of hope in times of personal despair. Trusting us means choosing relentless pursuit over passive acceptance, fierce representation over silent suffering – because when injustices occur within Prairie du Rocher or beyond its borders – Carlson Bier is here advocating fairness every step of the way.

About Carlson Bier

Personal Injury Lawyers in Prairie du Rocher Illinois

Welcome to Carlson Bier, your trustworthy personal injury law firm, based in Illinois. We specialize in advocating for individuals who have experienced physical or psychological harm as a result of negligence or wrongdoing by another party. Navigating the complexities of personal injury law can be daunting; however, our expert team is devoted to providing you with adept guidance and committed representation throughout your legal journey.

Understanding the fundamental aspects of Personal Injury Law empowers you to make informed decisions regarding your case. Primarily, it focusses on holding responsible parties accountable for any injuries as a consequence of their actions (or inactions). Cases can range from car accidents, workplace incidents, medical malpractice to even defamation lawsuits.

To ensure successful compensation claims:

• Establish that there has been a breach of duty: Breach denotes that the responsible party failed to perform his/her obligations which could have prevented the injury.

• Validate causation: The link between your injuries and the other party’s actions should be sufficiently evident.

• Verify actual damages: Have undeniable proof that you’ve incurred losses due to this incident – these could range from medical bill receipts to documented wage loss.

The cornerstone of Carlson Bier’s practice lies within its resilience against at-fault parties and insurance companies’ tactics designed to minimize payouts. Alongside assessing each detail related to fault attribution and calculating comprehensive damage totals inclusive of economic and non-economic losses sustained by our clients.

Our attorneys possess extensive hands-on experience in aggressive courtroom advocacy along with masterful negotiation skills when dealing with insurers. Our goal isn’t just about seeking recovery for immediate damages – we diligently strategize towards securing future potential cost coverage that may seem unforeseen now but might weigh heavy later on. We pride ourselves on being those steady hands guiding clients through this anxious process – not merely as an attorney-client relationship but striving persistently towards regaining belief in justice served right!

Moreover, while working tirelessly without pause upfront following an unfortunate event boosts chances towards a positive verdict, we also comprehend that this isn’t always viable for personal injury victims. Therefore, Carlson Bier extends its legal prowess to creating custom-tailored strategies throughout the claim timeline without compromising on case merits.

Despite our firm’s broad Illinois-based practice radius, it is essential to note for clients seeking local representation – Carlson Bier exercises strict adherence to Illinois law concerning office locations. We do not falsely advertise or imply physical offices where none exist – integrity and transparency form non-negotiable pillars of our ethical code.

The journey towards justice can be complex and fraught with challenges. At Carlson Bier, we’re here to support you every step of the way as your personal advocate, standing shoulder-to-shoulder in your quest for rightful compensation. Trust us; every minute detail matters when asserting claims—medical records, incident reports, wage loss documents are all part of gathering ammunition against deep-pocketed insurers readying their defenses. Our commitment lies in par excellence strategy planning – mapping scenarios only experts who’ve ‘been there done that’ could predict! It’s each such success story penned down by client faith that forms the enduring legacy behind our meticulously curated victories!

There’s no better time than now, especially after understanding Personal Injury Law essentials compliments of Carlson Bier – why not take the next call-to-action? See how much your case might potentially be worth! After all, informed decisions make successful outcomes more likely than ever before.

Deciding on legal representation shouldn’t short-change any linked compensation deserved rightfully by you nor should it hold back attaining closure over a painful chapter finally coming around its conclusive bend. Here at Carlson Bier—the rigidity of law translates into comforting assurance since client advocacy remains fundamental core focus undisputed!

It would help if you didn’t have to grapple with insurance companies alone while nursing an injury sustained undeservedly so! Allow us at Carlson Bier our expert opportunity to navigate these choppy waters of legal intricacies for you. Start by clicking the button below and discover what your case could be worth today!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Prairie du Rocher Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Prairie du Rocher

Areas of Practice in Prairie du Rocher

Pedal Cycle Collisions

Expert in legal services for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' recklessness or unsafe conditions.

Flame Wounds

Extending expert legal advice for individuals of major burn injuries caused by accidents or carelessness.

Physician Carelessness

Offering dedicated legal support for persons affected by clinical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Items Fault

Handling cases involving problematic products, providing professional legal guidance to customers affected by defective items.

Geriatric Abuse

Advocating for the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to neglect in senior centers environments, ensuring justice.

Fall & Fall Injuries

Professional in tackling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal representation to persons seeking compensation for their damages.

Childbirth Injuries

Delivering legal help for loved ones affected by medical malpractice resulting in birth injuries.

Motor Collisions

Incidents: Focused on guiding victims of car accidents get reasonable payout for harms and harm.

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Specializing in providing legal advice for motorcyclists involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for traumas.

18-Wheeler Incident

Extending expert legal services for victims involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing appropriate claims for damages.

Construction Accidents

Engaged in representing staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or negligence.

Head Harms

Committed to offering professional legal services for individuals suffering from cerebral injuries due to incidents.

Dog Bite Wounds

Skilled in handling cases for victims who have suffered injuries from K9 assaults or wildlife encounters.

Jogger Incidents

Focused on legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering recovery.

Undeserved Demise

Standing up for relatives affected by a wrongful death, extending empathetic and adept legal guidance to ensure fairness.

Vertebral Injury

Specializing in supporting persons with spinal cord injuries, offering expert legal services to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer