...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Milford

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with Spinal Cord Injuries, it’s crucial to place your confidence in seasoned legal experts like Carlson Bier. We are an established Illinois-based law firm specializing in personal injury cases, committed to protecting the rights of spinal cord injury victims. Our team comprises proficient attorneys who possess vast experience and a deep understanding of the complexities surrounding such injuries. They work diligently to ensure you receive maximum compensation for medical bills, rehabilitation costs and lost wages that often accompany these life-altering injuries. Each case presented is handled meticulously by our lawyers who analyze every detail keenly ensuring no stone is unturned when fighting for justice on your behalf; thereby increasing your chances of a favorable outcome immensely.

Residents within Milford can also benefit from our top-tier services without worry about geographical limitations because at Carlson Bier we bring knowledge and support right where it matters most – during negotiation trials or settlement procedures as per Illinois law norms. Let us be your fortress during tumultuous times – choose Carlson Bier: success coupled with sensitivity!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Milford Illinois

As renowned Illinois-based personal injury attorneys, Carlson Bier prioritizes the welfare of clients affected by spinal cord injuries. Such injuries often result in substantial physical, emotional, and financial distress. It is crucial to understand the nature, implications, and legal avenues available for victims of spinal cord-related accidents or malpractice. Our extensive experience working with cases involving spinal cord injuries has equipped us with invaluable insights that can help you navigate complex processes effectively.

Spinal cord injuries are a severe form of trauma that impacts your body’s central nervous system; adversely affecting motor skills, body functions and general quality of life. Frequently caused due to slip-and-falls, car accidents or even surgical errors, these can lead to partial or total paralysis. Prolonged treatment and rehabilitation periods combined with loss of income further accentuate the issue on hand.

• Compensation claims for spinal cord injuries need meticulous evidence gathering.

• The invoked damage extends beyond immediate medical care costs—include therapy/rehabilitation charges as well as future possible expenses.

• Assessing long-term impacts like alteration of lifestyle choices, reduced ability to work or loss in earning capacity is integral.

• Statute limitations: Timely action is crucial as the law permits filing claims within certain timeframes post-injury.

At Carlson Bier, we provide expert legal assistance finely attuned to detailing and mapping each step strategically for maximum compensation recovery. Our understanding of insurance companies’ tactics helps us encase your rights without any compromise while reinforcing negotiations from a position rooted firmly in legal facts and precedents.

It’s important to work collaboratively with our team; our stringent practices ensure all necessary documentation is in place – from obtaining requisite medical records portraying complete prognosis details along with projected future needs if any – carefully assessing chances across different scenarios structuring a solid claim framework accordingly.

If negligence was alleged – whether it was reckless driving leading to an accident or professional malfeasance on part of health providers – we will put forward a relentless pursuit in establishing accountability, escalating claims to litigation if required.

We fully sympathize with the compelling challenges you may be facing right now. Our goal is not merely focused on obtaining monetary redressal but also reinforcing faith in systematic justice, which unfortunately can sometimes feel dishearteningly impersonal especially dealing with bureaucratic hurdles involved in navigating insurance settlements or even basic provision of care.

The Carlson Bier team has been privileged to represent numerous Illinois residents over years – advocating fiercely for their rights and ensuring no element of exploitation slips through legislative or bureaucratic cracks often used by those diverting rightful compensation.

Without commitment towards anything less than complete client satisfaction combined with par excellence legal acuity across all aspects related to personal injury litigations pertaining Spinal Cord Injuries, we are here for you during this challenging time helping navigate perhaps one of life’s toughest storms head-on.

Please do reach out – your query does not bind any obligations. Click on the button below so that our team can better understand your specific circumstances and provide an estimate of what your case could potentially be worth under prevailing statutes guiding spinal cord injury compensations within Illinois. Amidst uncertainty, gain clarity by understanding where you stand legally – together; seeking reparation while providing steadfast support closer home.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Milford Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Milford

Areas of Practice in Milford

Bicycle Crashes

Specializing in legal assistance for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others's negligence or hazardous conditions.

Burn Damages

Offering specialist legal services for individuals of severe burn injuries caused by incidents or negligence.

Healthcare Carelessness

Delivering expert legal support for individuals affected by physician malpractice, including surgical errors.

Commodities Responsibility

Addressing cases involving dangerous products, delivering professional legal guidance to consumers affected by product malfunctions.

Senior Misconduct

Protecting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to abuse in care facilities environments, ensuring justice.

Trip and Trip Mishaps

Skilled in tackling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal support to individuals seeking restitution for their losses.

Infant Damages

Supplying legal help for families affected by medical negligence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Automobile Accidents

Crashes: Focused on guiding sufferers of car accidents obtain equitable compensation for injuries and harm.

Scooter Collisions

Focused on providing legal advice for bikers involved in bike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for traumas.

Trucking Mishap

Delivering specialist legal services for individuals involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing adequate compensation for losses.

Building Site Collisions

Focused on assisting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or irresponsibility.

Cognitive Harms

Specializing in extending specialized legal advice for victims suffering from head injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Bite Damages

Skilled in dealing with cases for persons who have suffered wounds from puppy bites or beast attacks.

Foot-traveler Accidents

Specializing in legal support for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Undeserved Loss

Standing up for families affected by a wrongful death, extending sensitive and experienced legal services to ensure redress.

Backbone Trauma

Specializing in defending individuals with vertebral damage, offering dedicated legal guidance to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​