...

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Oak Brook

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering from a spinal cord injury can cause enormous physical and emotional impacts. When this damage occurs due to someone else’s negligence, you have the right to pursue justice. Carlson Bier is your premier choice for legal representation in these cases. Boasting a wealth of experience representing clients with spinal cord injuries, our team works tirelessly to help victims navigate through the complex legal system effectively and confidently.

Our skilled attorneys are deeply committed to upholding your rights while working towards obtaining substantial compensation that reflects not only the financial burdens related but also addresses emotional distress, loss of life quality, pain and suffering.

With excellence ingrained in all they do, Carlson Bier thrives on knowledge-based strategy shaping successful outcomes for our clients.. Our unrivaled commitment remains steadfast – advocating rigorously for those affected by Spinal Cord Injuries.

Your peace of mind drives us constantly forward as we assertively challenge insurance companies or negligent parties who resist fair settlement claims distracting them away from lengthy court proceedings whenever possible—trust an affiliation renowned across distant horizons extending even into Oak Brook: choose absolute reliability coupled with exceptional expertise…choose Carlson Bier.

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Oak Brook Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in personal injury cases, with significant experience and expertise in handling those related to Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI). As a reputable law firm based in Illinois, we understand the intricacies involved in every case and work tirelessly to bring justice for our clients.

SCIs have life-altering impacts that extend beyond potential physical impairment. The emotional trauma linked with such an injury can be just as debilitating. At Carlson Bier, we stringently advocate for these victims, ensuring they receive adequate compensation to cater for their expansive medical treatments and subsequent needs.

A quick overview of SCIs reveals two main types: complete SCIs, involving a total lack of sensory and motor function below the level of injury; and incomplete SCIs where there’s partial sensory or motor function below the affected area. Both categories possess unique circumstances that need tailored legal approaches when pushing for compensation.

Let us delve into the causes of these injuries:

• Motor vehicle accidents – This makes up about half of new SCI cases annually.

• Falls – Particularly regular among older adults above 65 years.

• Violence- Gunshots wounds constitute a substantial number of all SCI cases.

• Sports activities – High impact games can occasionally lead to serious spine injuries.

However diverse these situations might appear, the importance of enlisting experienced legal counsel cannot be overstated. Our team at Carlson Bie understands the complex nature of spinal cord injuries — from gathering evidence through tireless investigation processes to analyzing multiple expert testimonies regarding medical costs; our primary goal is establishing your rightful claim towards extensive restitution.

Understanding how insurance companies operate is also critical here. Frustratingly enough, some providers may endeavor to dispute your claim or minimize your benefits under various pretexts. We are no strangers to negotiating with insurance entities—leveraging every bit of admissible evidence to combat their delay tactics while maximizing your deserved recompense.

Furthermore, liability determination forms a critical aspect of personal injury cases. Our team at Carlson Bie guides clients through this process, identifying every party that could have contributed towards the accident resulting in the SCI. This rigorous examination approach allows us to explore every available option for compensation.

Aside from direct physical harm associated with SCIs, victims also bear the burden of multiple indirect costs arising from general life adjustments post-injury. At Carlson Bier, we factor in these subtleties when analyzing your claim’s total value:

• Medical care and related expenses.

• Lost wages due to inability to work or reduced productivity.

• Emotional trauma and suffering.

• Rehabilitative services, including physical therapy.

• Home modifications required due to new mobility needs.

The category of damages dictates a dual focus: economic (tangible costs) and non-economic (intangible pains). With our firm at your side, rest assured we will consider all aspects meticulously before tabling any settlement offer.

We believe it is fundamental for potential clients to understand fully the circumstances surrounding their SCIs. Therefore, offering such comprehensive educational content addressed in layman terms reaffirms our commitment as not just attorney practitioners but dedicated partners in your journey towards recovery.

Choosing a proficient lawyer entails far more than assessing basic credentials; it primarily revolves around trust—a common value that binds us together. So while you might be besieged by legal jargon regarding who is at fault or how much money you’re entitled to receive, let our friendly expert staff address all these issues one-on-one — demystifying legal blindness into concrete clarity.

Remember, arranging a free consultation with us doesn’t automatically bind you into an agreement—this interaction benefits both parties by evaluating case suitability beneficially without mandatory commitments on either end.

At Carlson Bie, we champion justice relentlessly–believing firmly each SCI victim deserves fair treatment and maximum possible compensation for their pain and struggles. We invite you now; seize this moment: utilize our vast experience and collective resources, and let us move forward towards achieving justice together.

Wondering how much your SCI case might be worth? Click on the button below. Let’s start a discussion —surely, you won’t regret taking this decisive step today.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Oak Brook Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Oak Brook

Areas of Practice in Oak Brook

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Dedicated to legal representation for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others's carelessness or risky conditions.

Scald Injuries

Giving skilled legal support for people of serious burn injuries caused by mishaps or negligence.

Clinical Malpractice

Extending dedicated legal representation for individuals affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Products Responsibility

Handling cases involving problematic products, offering expert legal support to customers affected by product malfunctions.

Elder Abuse

Supporting the rights of elders who have been subjected to neglect in senior centers environments, ensuring fairness.

Tumble & Tumble Mishaps

Expert in tackling tumble accident cases, providing legal advice to individuals seeking compensation for their suffering.

Childbirth Damages

Providing legal help for relatives affected by medical misconduct resulting in newborn injuries.

Car Collisions

Incidents: Focused on aiding individuals of car accidents get appropriate compensation for damages and harm.

Bike Collisions

Specializing in providing representation for bikers involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring just recovery for losses.

18-Wheeler Incident

Offering experienced legal advice for clients involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recovery for damages.

Construction Site Crashes

Dedicated to assisting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or misconduct.

Brain Injuries

Focused on delivering professional legal assistance for victims suffering from neurological injuries due to incidents.

Canine Attack Damages

Specialized in tackling cases for victims who have suffered harms from K9 assaults or wildlife encounters.

Foot-traveler Collisions

Specializing in legal representation for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering damages.

Wrongful Fatality

Working for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, offering empathetic and expert legal representation to ensure restitution.

Spine Damage

Committed to defending victims with spinal cord injuries, offering compassionate legal services to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer