...

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Prestbury

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Experience the sterling difference when it comes to legal representation for pedestrian accidents with Carlson Bier. Our proficient attorney group stands at the forefront in representing victims of pedestrian accident situations across Prestbury. With an unmatched track record, our firm takes a proactive and compassionate one-on-one approach that grants you direct access to experienced personal injury lawyers who stand ready to assertively uphold your rights while assuring you get maximum compensation.

At Carlson Bier, we fuse skillful litigation with ethical practices as aligned under Illinois law, creating unbeatable legal solutions specifically geared towards constructive outcomes for our clients – Pedestrian Accident survivors. Not limited by geographical boundaries, we work relentlessly regardless of which city in Illinois your case resides from providing high-quality representation.

Our depth of understanding related intricacies associated with pedestrian laws coupled with unwavering commitment sets us apart making Carlson Bier your worthy choice. We’re advocates motivated solely by client victory! Solidifying our place not just as the ‘litigation gurus’ but moreover earning us recognition as reliable encounter changers championing justice on behalf of accident victims everywhere within Illinois’s jurisdiction.

About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Prestbury Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we comprehend the magnitude of pedestrian accidents and their ensuing consequences. As a respected personal injury law firm in Illinois, our priority is to advocate for victims of these unsettling events and striving for rightful compensation on their behalf. Pedestrian accidents are often overlooked but they can result in a spectrum of injuries from minor scrapes to catastrophic trauma that may lead to lifelong implications or even death.

Understanding pedestrian accidents involves education on several key factors that contribute to this imminent public health issue. Firstly, there need be an awareness concerning the common causes which prominently include distracted drivers who are either intoxicated or using electronic devices whilst behind the wheel. Unsafe road crossings such as unmarked crosswalks or intersections without traffic signals also add to the risks significantly.

Likewise, recklessness showcased by pedestrians themselves — crossing roads at non-designated points, not observing traffic lights or signs, walking while drunk or engrossed with electronic gadgets contributes noticeably to the incidence of pedestrian accidents. With attention diverted away from their surroundings by visual-manual subtasks linked mainly with handheld devices usage; pedestrians inadvertently become contributors rather than mere victims in these unfortunate circumstances.

Moreover:

• One must remember that common injuries resulting from these types of incidents often incorporate head trauma, bone fractures, spinal cord injuries among others leading to significant medical costs.

• Liability determination depends upon careful review! It is not always solely attributed to motorists—the law assesses both parties’ actions during an accident.

• A crucial aspect post-accident is immediate investigation—eye-witness testimonials along with photographic evidence taken promptly after the incident can play a pivotal role in claim substantiation.

• Compensation varies depending upon numerous variables: severity and nature of injuries, impact on quality-of-life & earning capacity coupled with defrayal considerations against future treatment expenses form part of valuation basis.

Carlson Bier’s extensive experience dealing with courts and insurance companies facilitates us in negotiating advantageous settlements while remaining prepared simultaneously for possible litigation against those denying rightful responsibility. Our multi-faceted approach keeps your best interest at heart while ensuring the highest level of representation; our proficiency empowers us to accurately evaluate merits and substantiate your claim effectively.

Our team’s dedication goes beyond mere legal assistance—we guide you during your convalescent phase. We steadfastly endeavour to alleviate strains associated with navigating through copious medical bills, rigorous procedures along with physical and emotional stress encompassing such dire situations.

It is worthwhile to note that personal injury cases often confront one with ‘statute of limitations’ hurdles, thus having sound legal counsel promptly post-incident remains exceedingly crucial in preserving victim’s rights towards seeking damages. At Carlson Bier, our committed professionals ensure meticulous case preparation aligning within statutory deadlines prevalent under Illinois law thereby standing by victims throughout their pursuit of justice.

In bridging this critical gap between misfortune and deserved compensation, we invite you to leverage our experienced representation aiding countless past clients secure rightful recompense during these trying times. If you or a loved one have been involved in a pedestrian accident in Illinois, don’t hesitate any longer! Discover how much your case may be worth by clicking on the button below. With Carlson Bier working tirelessly for your cause; rest assured—you are never alone!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Prestbury Residents

Links
Legal Blogs
All Attorney Services in Prestbury

Areas of Practice in Prestbury

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Specializing in legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' carelessness or perilous conditions.

Burn Burns

Extending skilled legal services for patients of major burn injuries caused by mishaps or indifference.

Hospital Carelessness

Extending experienced legal support for patients affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Products Accountability

Taking on cases involving dangerous products, supplying skilled legal services to customers affected by faulty goods.

Geriatric Malpractice

Protecting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to neglect in nursing homes environments, ensuring compensation.

Trip & Stumble Occurrences

Skilled in managing stumble accident cases, providing legal services to clients seeking restitution for their losses.

Birth Injuries

Extending legal guidance for families affected by medical incompetence resulting in birth injuries.

Car Accidents

Collisions: Dedicated to helping sufferers of car accidents obtain fair remuneration for hurts and losses.

Scooter Collisions

Expert in providing legal support for riders involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for damages.

Truck Crash

Offering adept legal support for persons involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing adequate recompense for losses.

Construction Incidents

Dedicated to representing staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or negligence.

Head Traumas

Expert in delivering compassionate legal assistance for patients suffering from brain injuries due to negligence.

Dog Attack Wounds

Adept at addressing cases for persons who have suffered damages from dog bites or creature assaults.

Jogger Incidents

Expert in legal advocacy for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering restitution.

Undeserved Demise

Fighting for families affected by a wrongful death, supplying understanding and expert legal representation to ensure restitution.

Spinal Cord Trauma

Expert in representing persons with backbone trauma, offering professional legal services to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer