FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Trucking Accident Attorney in South Shore

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the harrowing aftermath of a trucking accident, you need experienced legal representation on your side. Enter Carlson Bier – Illinois’s trusted personal injury lawyer firm specializing in trucking accidents. Our expert attorneys have proven track records in securing deserved compensations for their clients, ensuring that those devastated by these types of incidents receive adequate recompense for medical bills, lost wages, and even emotional distress. Notable not just for our professionalism and dedication but also our strategic approach underpinned by detailed investigations and meticulous evidence gathering processes. Choose us at Carlson Bier to navigate this complex pathway towards justice backed with empathetic understanding of your hardship every step along the way as we relentlessly work to guard your rights against negligence-causing entities or insurance companies ready to play hardball tactics. Trust us; when it comes down to defending victims like you who’ve been unfairly traumatized due to another’s recklessness on the road – there’s no better consideration than Carlson Bier if pursuing uncompromised justice is what drives you forward.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Trucking Accident Lawyers in South Shore Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our expert team is dedicated to understanding the unique complexities that often surround trucking accidents. As a leading authority in the realm of personal injury law, we serve clients across Illinois and strive meticulously to ensure their rights are upheld and they are adequately compensated for their suffering.

Navigating legal waters post-trucking accident can often be an intimidating venture, with blurry lines demarcating fault or liability. Not only is it overwhelming on an emotional front, but it can also be complex and time-consuming. Amidst all the paperwork and insurance claims, as well as dealing with lost wages, physical pain, medical costs, and rehabilitation expenses— having professional support becomes crucial.

Our proficiency lies in pinpointing key issues that may arise after a trucking accident such as:

* Deciphering whether negligence played a part in the incident

* Determination of responsibility among multiple parties involved

* Ensuring optimal compensation for your medical bills

* Reflecting upon loss of earnings due to inability to work

* Evaluating compensatory damages for pain and suffering.

The uniqueness of each case mandates personalized attention- which is what we promise at Carlson Bier. Additionally, there’s more than just recognizing applicable laws; understanding how these intricate state statutes intersect with federal regulations crafted specifically towards commercial truck insurance coverage is critical for accurately assessing damage liability.

One distinguishing feature associated with trucking accidents revolves around weighty vehicles causing catastrophic injuries far more severe compared to typical car accidents—a factor that intensifies claim complexity multifold. For innocent victims ensnared within this trauma – building a robust case demands careful staging fueled by skillful evidence collation and sharp negotiation tactics honed over years— expertise that we bring to your service at Carlson Bier.

As experienced litigators accustomed to going head-to-head against formidable opponents (including big-shot insurance companies), our attorneys understand that overseeing every tiny detail makes significant impact collectively. Consequently, we dig deep, untangling the web of potential liability to leave no stone unturned – involving truck drivers, their employers, vehicle manufacturers, and even maintenance technicians.

The groundwork extends beyond allegations of driver fatigue or inebriation as well; we are well-versed with prevalent practices wherein companies skirt regular vehicle service intervals or safety checks to cut corners— thereby increasing risk quotient exponentially. Cornerstone issues such as tire pressure monitoring maintenance potentially left unchecked play an enormous role towards accident causation that could be leveraged for fortifying your claim.

Regardless of whether you’ve fallen victim to a reckless 18-wheeler collision or tragic commercial delivery van mishap – our specialized attorneys at Carlson Bier stand equipped to guide you each step of the way—for standing up against those at fault and ensuring equitable justice served is our passion blended seamlessly within professional prowess.

Knowledge is power – something that enables victims in making educated decisions about their legal paths. If you’re looking for dedicated assistance that goes beyond basic consultation session—you need a trailblazing legal partner championing your cause persistently behind courtroom walls—and outside them too! At Carlson Bier, expect nothing less than unwavering commitment underscored by seasoned competency coupled with compassionate counsel geared exclusively towards optimizing compensation outcomes.

Often it’s difficult to gauge how much your case might be worth—which is why we offer clarity at your fingertips. Click on the button below to access our efficient tool guiding you through accurate estimates—helping you take eased breaths amidst turbulent times. Trust us—when it comes to fighting your corner passionately yet professionally—we’ve got what it takes …and more! Our determination echoes loud and clear as we urge—here’s your chance—to Let Justice Prevail.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For South Shore Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Trucking Accident FAQ​

Trucking accidents are often caused by a combination of factors, including driver fatigue, mechanical failures, improper loading of cargo, speeding, and inadequate driver training. External factors like poor road conditions and bad weather can also contribute.

Safety first: move to a safe area if possible. Call emergency services for medical and police assistance. Document the scene with photos and notes, and gather contact information from witnesses and all involved parties. It’s also crucial to seek medical attention, even if you feel fine, as some injuries may not be immediately apparent.

Liability in trucking accidents can be complex. It may involve the truck driver, the trucking company, manufacturers of truck parts, or other third parties. An investigation will typically look into the driver’s actions, vehicle maintenance records, the trucking company’s compliance with regulations, and other factors to determine fault.

Victims of trucking accidents may be entitled to various forms of compensation, including medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and property damage. In some cases, punitive damages might be awarded, especially if gross negligence or intentional misconduct is involved.

Trucking accidents often involve complex legal and regulatory issues. An attorney with experience in this field can navigate federal and state trucking laws, deal with large trucking companies and their insurers, and help ensure that you receive fair compensation. They can also assist in gathering evidence and expert testimonies necessary for building a strong case.

All Attorney Services in South Shore

Areas of Practice in South Shore

Bicycle Accidents

Specializing in legal assistance for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others's lack of care or perilous conditions.

Flame Wounds

Offering skilled legal help for patients of major burn injuries caused by events or misconduct.

Physician Misconduct

Providing specialist legal advice for patients affected by physician malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Goods Responsibility

Addressing cases involving faulty products, delivering skilled legal support to consumers affected by faulty goods.

Geriatric Misconduct

Defending the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to misconduct in elderly care environments, ensuring restitution.

Slip and Fall Occurrences

Skilled in addressing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal support to victims seeking compensation for their losses.

Neonatal Harms

Extending legal aid for households affected by medical malpractice resulting in birth injuries.

Motor Accidents

Crashes: Focused on guiding victims of car accidents obtain appropriate compensation for damages and impairment.

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Expert in providing legal assistance for individuals involved in scooter accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for damages.

Semi Incident

Offering specialist legal advice for drivers involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing appropriate claims for losses.

Building Site Accidents

Concentrated on assisting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or misconduct.

Brain Damages

Focused on providing professional legal assistance for clients suffering from cognitive injuries due to incidents.

K9 Assault Damages

Specialized in dealing with cases for clients who have suffered injuries from dog bites or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Incidents

Focused on legal representation for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering compensation.

Unwarranted Fatality

Standing up for relatives affected by a wrongful death, delivering sensitive and professional legal representation to ensure restitution.

Neural Trauma

Dedicated to advocating for clients with spinal cord injuries, offering specialized legal guidance to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​