...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Walnut

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the aftermath of a dog bite incident, your search for experienced legal representation ends with Carlson Bier—committed to ensuring rightful justice for unanticipated Dog Bite Injuries. With proficiency in Illinois personal injury law, our attorneys offer a distinguished service that prioritizes your interests and financial recovery. Navigating these complex cases requires expertise, something we guarantee at Carlson Bier; we have substantial experience interpreting animal control regulations and local legislation applicable around Walnut. Being bitten by a dog can present physical as well as psychological trauma—and you shouldn’t navigate this alone. Our adept lawyers carefully represent your case—with empathy yet assertiveness—to secure compensation proportionate to the severity of your injuries or long-term trauma resulted due to negligent pet owners. Choosing Carlson Bier means you are opting for strategic guidance backed with years of specialized practice saving hassle during such an emotional time—from honourably litigating on behalf of victims across many locales within Illinois and helping them regain hold over their lives post harrowing incidents.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Walnut Illinois

As legal experts in personal injury cases, The Carlson Bier Group is exceptionally equipped and ready to help you navigate through the complexities of dog bite injuries. Based out of Illinois, the law firm comprehensively understands state-specific laws related to such injuries and has extensive experience handling them with precision and skill.

Dog bites can be a traumatic event; they don’t just inflict physical harm but often leave victims grappling with emotional distress as well. Many victims are not aware that they have certain rights under Illinois law which allows for compensation due to this type of injury. Here at Carlson Bier, we are dedicated to advocating on behalf of dog bite victims while ensuring their rights are upheld against negligent pet owners.

A key factor when prevailing in a dog bite case is establishing proof that the animal’s owner was negligent or lacked control over it at the time of incident. Even if a victim was partially responsible for the incident, he/she may still be entitled to some form of damages under the doctrine of comparative negligence practiced in Illinois.

Here are some critical factors which influence successful outcomes in dog bite cases:

• Verification that the defendant owned the dog.

• Evidence showing lackadaisical behavior or negligence by said owner.

• Demonstrable harm (physical/emotional) inflicted upon claimant owing to the incident.

Each point plays into building a compelling litigation strategy meant to amplify your side before judgement.

Taking you on an educational journey about your EXACT rights after suffering from a canine attack forms part of our primary objectives here at Carlson Bier Group. Our competent team will guide you meticulously through each step women taken towards securing fair representation and remuneration following a debilitating dog-bite encounter.

Our attorneys put their best foot forward when working on these claims – right from gathering evidence related to liabilities upto quantifying and documenting every shred of damage incurred during this ordeal making sure every individual gets justified attention their case deserves.

Filing claims isn’t always as straightforward as it may seem, especially when trying to handle everything yourself while recovering. Illinois has statutes of limitations that can affect your rights if you wait too long to take action. These complications and casualties are what we prevent at Carlson Bier.

Time remains of the essence in cases of dog bite injuries and our law firm ensures swift progress in filing claims and fighting for clients’ deserved compensations. Also, our attorneys account strategically for all potential damages—both immediate and future—that could cover lost wages from missed work days, medical bills (including therapy), emotional trauma, pain/suffering resulting from a canine’s attack which will boost your chances of securing complete financial recovery.

Knowing which legal procedures to navigate, collecting appropriate evidence & defending personal injury victims are areas where Carlson Bier Group attorneys expertly thrive. With us standing firmly by your side every step of the way, rest assured knowing that you will never wade through this alone.

In conclusion we invite you to reach out to us today so we can start building a strong legal case toward reclaiming control over your life after such an incident. Knowledge is empowerment; thus allow us at Carlson Bier Group – seasoned professionals that know precisely how these cases operate within Illinois jurisdictions – guide you towards winning rightful compensation amidst this difficult time.

Don’t dwell any longer on wondering what next step should be taken after being victimized by a dog bite. With an outstanding track record primarily advocating for personal injury victims throughout Illinois coupled with expansive knowledge acquired over repeated triumphs against negligent defendants responsible for causing dog-bite injuries; why not give yourself advantage having one foremost firms batting on your behalf?

Take control now! Click on the button below to find out just how much your case might be worth – it’s time those guilty paid due restitution enabling you evolve from being mere survivors into becoming victorious warriors fighting back against injustice levied by wrongful act perpetrators

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Walnut Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Walnut

Areas of Practice in Walnut

Bicycle Collisions

Expert in legal representation for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' carelessness or perilous conditions.

Flame Injuries

Extending specialist legal assistance for victims of major burn injuries caused by mishaps or carelessness.

Hospital Carelessness

Ensuring experienced legal support for patients affected by healthcare malpractice, including negligent care.

Goods Liability

Managing cases involving unsafe products, supplying specialist legal support to consumers affected by product-related injuries.

Nursing Home Mistreatment

Defending the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to mistreatment in elderly care environments, ensuring compensation.

Trip & Fall Incidents

Skilled in handling stumble accident cases, providing legal representation to sufferers seeking compensation for their harm.

Neonatal Injuries

Providing legal guidance for relatives affected by medical carelessness resulting in newborn injuries.

Auto Mishaps

Incidents: Devoted to supporting victims of car accidents secure equitable recompense for injuries and impairment.

Motorcycle Collisions

Expert in providing representation for bikers involved in bike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for traumas.

Big Rig Collision

Ensuring expert legal services for drivers involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing fair settlement for hurts.

Building Site Crashes

Concentrated on supporting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or negligence.

Brain Damages

Specializing in offering dedicated legal support for clients suffering from cerebral injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Damages

Proficient in tackling cases for people who have suffered damages from dog bites or animal attacks.

Pedestrian Accidents

Dedicated to legal support for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering damages.

Undeserved Passing

Advocating for families affected by a wrongful death, supplying understanding and adept legal guidance to ensure redress.

Backbone Trauma

Committed to supporting victims with backbone trauma, offering expert legal representation to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​