FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Westville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When facing the profound impact of a spinal cord injury, it is paramount to find legal representation committed to securing the redress deserved. Carlson Bier stands as your dedicated partner, a stalwart law firm with an unrivaled track record in handling spinal cord injuries cases across Illinois. We understand that such injuries may not only cause physical distress but also emotional hardship and financial strain. Our team’s objective is beyond litigation; we help navigate these hurdles while fighting tirelessly for fair compensation.

The experience and proficiency of our attorneys anchor on extensive legal knowledge underscored by a deep familiarity with medical terminologies associated with spinal cord injuries—ensuring each case receives precise attention it deserves. At Carlson Bier, victory extends far beyond court cases—it echoes through the testimonies of clients whose lives have been significantly improved due to fair rulings from our thorough dedication.

We invite those impacted by spinal cord injuries seeking justice within Westville or wider regions in Illinois to consult us today: enjoy peace amidst tumultuous circumstances under Carlson Bier’s proficient counsel and support—a mark of unparalleled expertise managing your claims effectively. Trust Carlson Bier—the right choice when assurance means everything+

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Westville Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the debilitating nature of spinal cord injuries and the profound impact they often have on individuals’ lives. We specialize in advocating for victims of such injury, navigating the complexities of Illinois law to ensure our clients receive their rightful compensation.

Spinal Cord Injuries often result from medical malpractice, vehicle accidents or falls, causing serious bodily damage that may lead to devastating life changes. Effects can range from transient symptoms to severe conditions like paralysis requiring lifelong care. Furthermore, complications from these injuries are not limited to physical health but can extend to psychological and emotional wellbeing as well.

Depending on severity and location, spinal cord injuries generally fall into two categories—complete and incomplete. A complete injury represents total loss of function below the injury level while with an incomplete one embodies partial preservation of sensory or motor functions below injured area.

1) Complete Spinal Cord Injury: Victims lose all mobility and sensation beneath the point of trauma – quadriplegia (loss in all four limbs) or paraplegia (loss only in lower body).

2) Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury: Here there is some degree of function remaining below injury point – central cord syndrome where motor skills get affected, or anterior cord syndrome resulting in loss of thermal and pain sensations.

The repercussions ripple through every aspect of victims’ lives—their ability to work reduced or lost entirely; a dramatic shift in daily routine due to medical needs; heightened psychological stress from dependency on others—and substantially increase living costs. That’s where Carlson Bier comes into picture—we pursue fair financial restitution covering both tangible losses like income reduction/medical bills & intangible ones like suffering/pain endured by victim.

Our legal team knows how crucial timing is following a catastrophic incident—isolated information might disappear after passage of time so it is vital that investigation kicks off instantly allowing us collect all essential evidence before scenario changes which helps secure favorable outcome for case.

Recovery matters! If you or a loved one is going through hardships from spinal cord injury, we want to help. Our team at Carlson Bier brings expertise and empathy together for your benefit—we will fight passionately for your rights till end.

Federal, state laws applicable in Illinois recognize victims’ rights. This opens doors for pursuing compensation which covers costs for immediate medical care, continuing health services, loss of employment income and emotional distress inflicted by such injuries. Statute of limitations holds good only within certain time frame post-injury—another reason highlighting the urgency of legal action.

Through our commitment to relentless advocacy, we endeavor to secure optimal outcomes that truly reflect the magnitude of harm suffered due to these debilitating injuries. At Carlson Bier, it’s not just about winning cases; it’s about changing lives!

Each case is different & no lawyer can predict outcome but here at Carlson Bier our top priority is client care—we navigate legal labyrinth so that injured individual & their family focus on recovery.

Navigating life after devastating spinal trauma is challenging—not all wounds are visible—the psychological impacts; they’re just as real but often neglected aspect which deserves equal attention alongside physical healing process.

Do you feel ready? Click the button below and discover what your case could potentially be worth! It’s completely free—and with zeros strings attached—it’s quick means of finding out if effective legal representation from Carlson Bier might help get what you deserve: justice! Take first step towards understanding your situation better—and knowing how much this battle matters—with everything else left on us; Your focus stays entirely on healing journey ahead

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Westville Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Westville

Areas of Practice in Westville

Pedal Cycle Mishaps

Focused on legal assistance for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' recklessness or dangerous conditions.

Thermal Damages

Providing specialist legal support for victims of grave burn injuries caused by mishaps or misconduct.

Physician Malpractice

Ensuring experienced legal services for victims affected by healthcare malpractice, including negligent care.

Goods Fault

Handling cases involving problematic products, extending adept legal services to individuals affected by harmful products.

Geriatric Misconduct

Representing the rights of seniors who have been subjected to neglect in senior centers environments, ensuring fairness.

Stumble and Trip Accidents

Adept in tackling stumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to sufferers seeking restitution for their harm.

Infant Harms

Supplying legal assistance for loved ones affected by medical carelessness resulting in childbirth injuries.

Vehicle Crashes

Crashes: Committed to guiding patients of car accidents secure reasonable payout for hurts and losses.

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Dedicated to providing legal assistance for victims involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring fair compensation for harm.

Semi Accident

Ensuring professional legal services for clients involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing fair claims for harms.

Building Incidents

Engaged in assisting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or irresponsibility.

Cerebral Impairments

Dedicated to providing compassionate legal advice for individuals suffering from head injuries due to negligence.

Canine Attack Damages

Skilled in managing cases for victims who have suffered damages from puppy bites or creature assaults.

Jogger Collisions

Focused on legal advocacy for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering compensation.

Unwarranted Demise

Fighting for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, extending understanding and professional legal assistance to ensure redress.

Spine Trauma

Committed to defending patients with spine impairments, offering specialized legal services to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​